| Literature DB >> 28330500 |
Anjali Rawani1, Anushree Singha Ray2, Anupam Ghosh3, Mary Sakar4, Goutam Chandra5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vector control is facing a menace due to the appearance of resistance to synthetic insecticides. Insecticides of plant origin may provide appropriate substitute biocontrol techniques in the future. The present study was carried out to investigate the bio control potentiality of active ingredient isolated from chloroform: methanol (1:1 v/v) extract of mature leaves of Solanum nigrum L. (Solanaceae) against early 3rd instar larvae of Culex vishnui group (comprising of Cx. vishnui Theobald, Cx. pseudovishnui Colless and Cx. tritaeniorhynchus Giles) and Anopheles subpictus Grassi. S. nigrum is a common plant distributed in many parts of India with medicinal properties.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles subpictus; Culex vishnui group; Mosquito control; Phytosteroid; Solanum nigrum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28330500 PMCID: PMC5363031 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-2460-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Mean larval mortality of early 3rd instar larvae of Culex vishnui group and Anopheles subpictus to different concentrations of bioactive compound isolated from mature leaves of Solanum nigrum
| Mosquito species | Concentration (mg/L) | Per cent larval mortality (Mean ± SE) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | ||
|
| 25 | 62.68 ± 0.67 | 68.00 ± 0.58 | 84.00 ± 0.58 |
| 45 | 76.00 ± 1.15 | 80.00 ± 1.15 | 85.32 ± 1.45 | |
| 60 | 80.00 ± 1.15 | 92.00 ± 0.58 | 97.32 ± 0.33 | |
| Control | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | |
|
| 25 | 68.00 ± 0.58 | 85.32 ± 1.20 | 90.68 ± 0.88 |
| 45 | 81.32 ± 1.20 | 88.00 ± 1.15 | 97.32 ± 0.33 | |
| 60 | 86.68 ± 1.20 | 94.68 ± 0.88 | 100 ± 0.00 | |
| Control | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | |
Probit and regression analyses of mortality rates of early 3rd instar larvae of Culex vishnui group and Anopheles subpictus to different concentrations of bioactive compound isolated from mature leaves of Solanum nigrum
| Mosquito type | Time of exposure (h) | LC50 (mg/L) | LC50 (mg/L) LCL–UCL | LC90 (mg/L) | Regression equation | R value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 24 | 14.48 | 0.28–23.79 | 121.09 | Y = 0.12x + 12.75 | 0.77 |
| 48 | 15.89 | 5.37–22.48 | 61.40 | Y = 0.17x + 12.62 | 0.90 | |
| 72 | 5.64 | 0.00–14.68 | 44.33 | Y = 0.08x + 18.55 | 0.63 | |
|
| 24 | 13.21 | 1.15–21.36 | 76.27 | Y = 0.13x + 13.81 | 0.79 |
| 48 | 9.93 | 0.25–53.38 | 41.81 | Y = 0.06x + 19.52 | 0.51 | |
| 72 | 3.68 | 0.56–16.46 | 24.74 | Y = 0.26x + 84.30 | 0.98 |
LC lethal concentration, LCL lower confidence limit, UCL upper confidence limit, R regression coefficient value
Three way ANOVA of mortality rates of different mosquito species, different hours of exposure and concentration as variables
| Source of variation | Sum of squares |
| Mean square | F value | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mosquito species (MS) | 46.29 | 1 | 46.29 | 18.12 | 0.001* |
| Concentration (C) | 132.48 | 2 | 66.24 | 25.92 | 0.002* |
| Hours (H) | 156.48 | 2 | 78.24 | 30.62 | 0.003* |
| MS × C | 5.15 | 2 | 2.57 | 1.00 | 0.375 (NS) |
| MS × H | 1.82 | 2 | 0.91 | 0.36 | 0.703 (NS) |
| C × H | 10.08 | 4 | 2.52 | 0.98 | 0.427 (NS) |
| MS × C × H | 9.41 | 4 | 2.35 | 0.92 | 0.462 (NS) |
| Residual | 92 | 36 | 2.56 | ||
| Total | 453.7 | 53 |
* Significant at P < 0.05
NS not significant
Comparison of mean percentage mortality, standard error and their upper and lower bound at 95% confidence level By Tukey’s and Duncan test
| Mosquito species | Concentration (mg/L) | Time of exposure | Mean of mortality | SE | 95% Confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||||
|
| 25 | 24 | 62.68 | 0.92 | 55.16 | 70.16 |
| 48 | 68.00 | 0.92 | 60.52 | 75.48 | ||
| 72 | 84.00 | 0.92 | 76.52 | 91.48 | ||
| 45 | 24 | 76.00 | 0.92 | 68.52 | 83.48 | |
| 48 | 80.00 | 0.92 | 72.52 | 87.48 | ||
| 72 | 85.32 | 0.92 | 77.84 | 92.84 | ||
| 60 | 24 | 80.00 | 0.92 | 72.52 | 87.48 | |
| 48 | 92.00 | 0.92 | 84.52 | 99.48 | ||
| 72 | 97.32 | 0.92 | 89.84 | 104.8 | ||
|
| 25 | 24 | 68.00 | 0.92 | 60.52 | 75.48 |
| 48 | 85.32 | 0.92 | 77.84 | 92.84 | ||
| 72 | 90.68 | 0.92 | 83.16 | 98.16 | ||
| 45 | 24 | 81.32 | 0.92 | 73.84 | 88.84 | |
| 48 | 88.00 | 0.92 | 80.52 | 95.48 | ||
| 72 | 97.32 | 0.92 | 89.84 | 104.84 | ||
| 60 | 24 | 86.68 | 0.92 | 79.16 | 94.16 | |
| 48 | 94.68 | 0.92 | 87.16 | 102.16 | ||
| 72 | 100.00 | 0.92 | 92.52 | 107.48 | ||
List of 18 compounds which were present in chloroform: methanol (1:1 v/v) extract of mature leaves of Solanum nigrum
| Peak | Retention time | Area | Area (%) | Name of the compounds |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.107 | 2,301,900 | 29.215 | Triethyl phosphate |
| 2 | 11.786 | 201,861 | 2.562 | 4-Trifluoroacetoxytetradecane |
| 3 | 15.408 | 315,269 | 4.001 | 1-Hexadecanol |
| 4 | 15.558 | 55,573 | 0.705 | Methoxyacetic acid |
| 5 | 15.991 | 150,057 | 6.52 | Dodecanoic acid |
| 6 | 19.746 | 423,197 | 5.371 | 1-Nonadecene |
| 7 | 19.896 | 44,224 | 0.561 | Nonadecane |
| 8 | 20.804 | 68,193 | 0.865 | 3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexad |
| 9 | 21.544 | 94,848 | 1.204 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid |
| 10 | 21.771 | 33,263 | 0.422 | 3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2 hexadec |
| 11 | 23.664 | 357,961 | 4.543 | Dibutyl phthalate |
| 12 | 24.268 | 739,637 | 9.387 | 1-Nonadecene |
| 13 | 28.143 | 79,026 | 1.003 | 7-Hexadecenal |
| 14 | 28.652 | 432,164 | 5.485 | 1-Docosene |
| 15 | 32.780 | 214,734 | 2.725 | 1-Docosene |
| 16 | 33.110 | 154,885 | 1.966 | Pregn-16-en-20-one |
| 17 | 35.803 | 154,885 | 16.801 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid |
| 18 | 43.686 | 888,498 | 11.277 | Sarsasapogenin 3-tosylate |
Fig. 1Gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy analysis of bioactive compounds isolated from chloroform: methanol (1:1 v/v) extract of mature leaves of S. nigrum
Effect of bioactive compound on few non-target organisms at laboratory condition
| Non target organisms | Exposures (hrs) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 48 | 72 | |
|
| 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 2.00 ± 0.58 |
| Control | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
|
| 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| Control | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
M mortality, SE standard error