Literature DB >> 28330389

Radiation Doses and Associated Risk From the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.

Tetsuo Ishikawa1.   

Abstract

The magnitude of dose due to the Fukushima Daiichi Accident was estimated by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) 2013 report published in April 2014. Following this, the UNSCEAR white paper, which comprises a digest of new information for the 2013 Fukushima report, was published in October 2015. Another comprehensive report on radiation dose due to the accident is the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) report on the Fukushima Daiichi Accident published in August 2015. Although the UNSCEAR and IAEA publications well summarize doses received by residents, they review only literature published before the end of December 2014 and the end of March 2015, respectively. However, some studies on dose estimation have been published since then. In addition, the UNSCEAR 2013 report states it was likely that some overestimation had been introduced generally by the methodology used by the Committee. For example, effects of decontamination were not considered in the lifetime external dose estimated. Decontamination is in progress for most living areas in Fukushima Prefecture, which could reduce long-term external dose to residents. This article mainly reviews recent English language articles that may add new information to the UNSCEAR and IAEA publications. Generally, recent articles suggest lower doses than those presented by the UNSCEAR 2013 report.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fukushima; UNSCEAR report; accident; effective dose; thyroid dose

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28330389     DOI: 10.1177/1010539516675703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Public Health        ISSN: 1010-5395            Impact factor:   1.399


  6 in total

1.  Effect of Radiological Countermeasures on Subjective Well-Being and Radiation Anxiety after the 2011 Disaster: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Authors:  Michio Murakami; Yoshitake Takebayashi; Yoshihito Takeda; Akiko Sato; Yasumasa Igarashi; Kazumi Sano; Tetsuo Yasutaka; Wataru Naito; Sumire Hirota; Aya Goto; Tetsuya Ohira; Seiji Yasumura; Koichi Tanigawa
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Importance of risk comparison for individual and societal decision-making after the Fukushima disaster.

Authors:  Michio Murakami
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Congenital Heart Disease After the Fukushima Nuclear Accident: The Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database Study.

Authors:  Yasutaka Hirata; Hideyuki Shimizu; Hiraku Kumamaru; Shinichi Takamoto; Noboru Motomura; Hiroaki Miyata; Yutaka Okita
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Trends in Suicide Mortality in 10 Years around the Great East Japan Earthquake: Analysis of Evacuation and Non-Evacuation Areas in Fukushima Prefecture.

Authors:  Yujiro Kuroda; Masatsugu Orui; Arinobu Hori
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Risk Perception and Anxiety Regarding Radiation after the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident: A Systematic Qualitative Review.

Authors:  Yoshitake Takebayashi; Yuliya Lyamzina; Yuriko Suzuki; Michio Murakami
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  CURRENT STATUS OF THE FUKUSHIMA HEALTH MANAGEMENT SURVEY.

Authors:  Atsushi Kumagai; Koichi Tanigawa
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 0.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.