| Literature DB >> 28330191 |
Bhishma P Patel1, Arvind Kumar2.
Abstract
In the present work, removal of 4-chlorophenol (4-CP) by the mixed microbial consortium was evaluated in an airlift inner loop bioreactor. During the study, the effect of various reactor parameters such as hydraulic retention time (HRT), biogenetic substrate concentration, loading rate, and initial substrate concentration on the removal efficiency of 4-CP was investigated. Bioreactor showed a maximum removal rate of 16.59 mg/L/h at the optimum conditions of 24 h HRT, 400 mg/L initial 4-CP, and 0.2 g/L peptone. The optimum HRT found was 24 h after that the washout occured, and the degradation efficiency almost dropped to 50 % at 18 h HRT. Effect of peptone showed that lower concentration of peptone improves 4-CP removal efficiency of the bioreactor. Also, the mixed consortium had utilized 4-CP as a carbon source, as evidenced by the increasing biomass concentration with 4-CP at constant peptone concentration. The presence of 5-chloro 2-hydroxymuconic semialdehyde in the reactor infers that the mixed consortium has followed the meta-cleavage pathway for 4-CP degradation.Entities:
Keywords: 4-chlorophenol; Airlift reactor; Biodegradation; Biogenic substrate; Wastewater
Year: 2016 PMID: 28330191 PMCID: PMC4909021 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0435-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Fig. 1A schematic view of an airlift inner loop bioreactor. a Feed tank, b peristaltic pump, c influent, d air outlet and pH probe, e air compressor, f air rotameter, g downcomer, h riser, i air diffuser, j drainage or effluent, k air input, l metal rod supporting inner draft tube
Fig. 2The 4-CP removal by ALR and the effect of peptone concentration. The above figure shows the change in biomass concentration in the effluent during the continuous operation
Fig. 3The 4-CP removal efficiency by ALR in the presence of 0.2 g/L peptone and effect of initial substrate concentration and HRT. The above figure shows the change in biomass concentration in the effluent during the continuous operation
Effect of peptone concentration on 4-CP removal by ALR
| Time (day) | Influent concentration (mg/L) | HRT ± 1 (h) | Loading rate (mg/L/day) | Peptone (mg/L) | Biodegradation (%) | Volumetric removal rate (mg/L/h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | 20 | 40 | 12 | 1 | 99 | 0.495 |
| 3–8 | 40 | 40 | 24 | 1 | 82 | 0.82 |
| 9–14 | 40 | 30 | 32 | 1 | 56.5 | 0.753 |
| 15–24 | 40 | 30 | 32 | 0.5 | 75.8 | 1.01 |
| 29–31 | 40 | 48 | 20 | 0.2 | 100 | 0.84 |
| 42–43 | 200 | 48 | 100 | 0.2 | 100 | 4.17 |
| 44 | 250 | 48 | 125 | 0.2 | 99 | 5.2 |
Fig. 4Effect of HRT on the volumetric removal rate of 4-CP (400 mg/L) in the ALR with 0.2 g/L of peptone
Removal of 4-CP by ALR in the presence of 0.2 g/L peptone
| Time (day) | Influent concentration (mg/L) | HRT ± 1 (h) | Loading rate (mg/L/day) | Biodegradation (%) | Volumetric removal rate (mg/L/h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45 | 300 | 48 | 150 | 99 | 6.19 |
| 46–47 | 400 | 48 | 200 | 100 | 8.34 |
| 48 | 400 | 40 | 240 | 100 | 10 |
| 49 | 400 | 30 | 320 | 99 | 13.2 |
| 50–52 | 400 | 24 | 400 | 99.5 | 16.59 |
| 53–56 | 400 | 18 | 534 | 50 | 11.13 |
Fig. 5Effect of loading rate on the volumetric removal of 4-CP in the ALR with 0.2 g/L of peptone
Biodegradation of chlorophenols using different bioreactors
| Bioreactor | Compound | Concentration (mg/L) | HRT (h) | Loading rate (mg/L/day) | Removal rate (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBR | 4-CP | 99.13 | 24.4 | 97.5 | 98.7 | Galíndez-Mayer et al. ( |
| PBR | 4-CP | 20 | 2.78 | 172 | 100 | Kim et al. ( |
| CSTR | 4-CP | 20 | 4.17 | 115 | 100 | Kim et al. ( |
| UASB | 4-CP | 40 | 12 | 80 | 88.3 | Majumder and Gupta ( |
| ASU | 4-CP | 500 | 15 | 800 | 90 | Kargi and Konya ( |
| ALR | 2,4-DCP | 7–103 | 6.25 | 26–394 | 100–88 | Quan et al. ( |
| ALR | 2,4-DCP | 28.5 | 8 | 85.5 | 97.8 | Quan et al. ( |
| PB-ALR | 2,4,6-TCP | 5.76 | 2.95 | 46.88 | 99.9 | Gomez-De Jesus et al. ( |
| ALR | 4-CP | 400 | 24 | 400 | 99.8 | This study |
Activated sludge unit consisted of an aeration tank and a sludge settling tank (ASU); fluidized bed reactor (FBR); Packed bed reactor (PBR); continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR); upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB); airlift reactor (ALR); Packed bed airlift reactor (PB-ALR)