| Literature DB >> 28330158 |
Venkidasamy Baskar1, Baniekal H Gangadhar1, Se Won Park1, Shivraj Hariram Nile2.
Abstract
The present study aims to investigate the numerous factors influencing Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis). Factors affecting transformation efficiency, such as age of explants, Agrobacterium concentration, and effect of acetosyringone, pre-cultivation, infection and co-cultivation time of Agrobacterium were examined. The pre-cultured hypocotyls from young seedlings prior to exposure to Agrobacterium showed higher shoot regeneration. The plant transformation with the modest A. tumefaciens concentrations (0.8 OD) and the 3 days co-cultivation periods increased transformation efficiency. Plant growth hormones [1-naphthyl acetic acid (NAA) and 6-benzyl amino purine (BAP)] were essential for callus and shoot formation. Root formation was effective in half strength MS medium without supplementation of root-inducing hormones. To maintain selection pressure, plant subculture was carried out every 2 weeks with selective antibiotics. The putative transgenic plants were acclimatized in the greenhouse. Polymerase chain reaction was performed to confirm the integration of T-DNA into the genome of transgenic plants. A transformation efficiency of 15 % was obtained. This protocol allows effective transformation and indirect regeneration of Brassica rapa.Entities:
Keywords: Acetosyringone; Agrobacterium tumefaciens; Brassica rapa; Cultivation; Transformation
Year: 2016 PMID: 28330158 PMCID: PMC4781812 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0402-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the T-DNA region of pANDA vector. LB left border, RB right border, NPTII neomycin phosphotransferase II, Ubq pro ubiquitin promoter, attR att sites, NOSt nopaline synthase terminator, HPT hygromycin phosphotransferase, RB right border
Effect of growth regulators on callus induction, shoot formation, and root induction of Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis
| Growth regulators (mg l−1) | Callus per hypocotyl explants (%) | No. shoots from hypocotyl calli | Root induction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| BAP + NAA + AgNO3 | |||
| 1.0 + 3.0 + 4.0 | 35.25 ± 2.10d | ||
| 2.0 + 3.0 + 4.0 | 49.00 ± 2.76 cd | ||
| 3.0 + 3.0 + 4.0 | 65.00 ± 1.15b | ||
| 4.0 + 3.0 + 4.0 | 85.51 ± 1.12a | ||
| 5.0 + 3.0 + 4.0 | 51.42 ± 2.00c | ||
| BAP + NAA + AgNO3 | |||
| 4.0 + 3.0 + 4.0 | 1.52 ± 0.50e | ||
| 4.0 + 2.0 + 4.0 | 5.55 ± 0.75d | ||
| 4.0 + 1.0 + 4.0 | 9.21 ± 0.75c | ||
| 4.0 + 0.5 + 4.0 | 15.00 ± 0.55a | ||
| MS full strength | 59.00 ± 1.15b | ||
| MS half strength | 78.00 ± 1.00a | ||
| MS + IAA 1.0 | 49.52 ± 0.95c | ||
| MS + IBA 1.0 | 41.23 ± 1.01d | ||
Data represent mean values ± standard error (SE) of three replicates; each experiment was repeated thrice. Means with common letters are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT)
Factors affecting transformation frequency of Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis
| Factors | No. of explants cultured | Transformation frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-culture days | ||
| 0 | 30 | 0.0 |
| 1 | 30 | 7.0 ± 1.10e |
| 2 | 30 | 11.5 ± 2.00bc |
| | 30 |
|
| 4 | 30 | 10.5 ± 1.10d |
| OD value | ||
| 0.2 | 30 | 0.0 |
| 0.4 | 30 | 6.5 ± 1.00ef |
| 0.6 | 30 | 10.5 ± 1.50d |
| | 30 |
|
| 1.0 | 30 | 11.0 ± 1.25c |
| Co-culture period | ||
| 0 | 30 | 0.0 |
| 1 | 30 | 6.0 ± 1.00f |
| 2 | 30 | 12.2 ± 1.00b |
| | 30 |
|
| 4 | 30 | 10.0 ± 1.20d |
| Acetosyringone (mg l−1) | ||
| 0 | 30 | 0.0 |
| 2 | 30 | 2.0 ± 1.00f |
| 4 | 30 | 12.2 ± 1.00b |
| | 30 |
|
| | 30 | 10.0 ± 1.20d |
The best combinations of different factors (pre-culture, OD value, co-culture & acetosyringone) are shown in block letters. Data represent mean values ± standard error (SE) of three replicates; each experiment was repeated thrice. Means with common letters are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT)
Fig. 2Figure showing the formation of a callus induction b shoot induction c multiple shoot formation d root induction e hardening plants from the hypocotyls of Agrobacterium-transformed Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis plants
Fig. 3Genomic DNA PCR amplification of gus linker sequences from the representative transgenic Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis plants. C control plant, P positive control, M 100 bp ladder, 1–12 putative transformed plants