| Literature DB >> 28330079 |
S Abinandan1, S Shanthakumar2.
Abstract
Bicarbonate species in the aqueous phase is the primary source for CO2 for the growth of microalgae. The potential of carbon dioxide (CO2) fixation by Chlorella pyrenoidosa in enriched bicarbonate medium was evaluated. In the present study, effects of parameters such as pH, sodium bicarbonate concentration and inoculum size were assessed for the removal of CO2 by C. pyrenoidosa under mixotrophic condition. Central composite design tool from response surface methodology was used to validate statistical methods in order to study the influence of these parameters. The obtained results reveal that the maximum removal of CO2 was attained at pH 8 with sodium bicarbonate concentration of 3.33 g/l, and inoculum size of 30 %. The experimental results were statistically significant with R 2 value of 0.9527 and 0.960 for CO2 removal and accumulation of chlorophyll content, respectively. Among the various interactions, interactive effects between the parameters pH and inoculum size was statistically significant (P < 0.05) for CO2 removal and chlorophyll accumulation. Based on the studies, the application of C. pyrenoidosa as a potential source for carbon dioxide removal at alkaline pH from bicarbonate source is highlighted.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon concentrating mechanism; Chlorella pyrenoidosa; Dissolved inorganic carbon; Mixotrophic condition; Response surface methodology
Year: 2016 PMID: 28330079 PMCID: PMC4701708 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-015-0314-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Experimental range and levels of independent variables
| Independent variables | Design variables | Range and levels | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| pH |
| 4 | 6 | 8 |
| NaHCO3 (g/l) |
| 3.33 | 6.66 | 10 |
| Inoculum size (%) |
| 10 | 20 | 30 |
Central composite design matrix with coded and uncoded variables
| Run |
|
|
| pH | NaHCO3 (g/l) | Inoculum size (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 4.0 | 3.33 | 10 |
| 2 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 8.0 | 3.33 | 10 |
| 3 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 4.0 | 10 | 10 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 8.0 | 10 | 10 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 4.0 | 3.33 | 30 |
| 6 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 8.0 | 3.33 | 30 |
| 7 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 4.0 | 10 | 30 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8.0 | 10 | 30 |
| 9 | −1.68179 | 0 | 0 | 2.6 | 6.66 | 20 |
| 10 | 1.68179 | 0 | 0 | 9.4 | 6.66 | 20 |
| 11 | 0 | −1.68179 | 0 | 6.0 | 1.06 | 20 |
| 12 | 0 | 1.68179 | 0 | 6.0 | 12.27 | 20 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | −1.68179 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 3.18 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 1.68179 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 36.81 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 |
Fig. 1Flow chart representation of response surface methodology
Fig. 2Growth profile of microalgae under optimized condition [pH 8, NaHCO3 3.33 (g/l), inoculum size −30 (%)] and experimental condition
Central composite design matrix and the output responses for CO2 removal and chlorophyll
| Run | pH | NaHCO3 (g/l) | Inoculum size (%) | CO2 removal (%)(experimental) | CO2 removal (%)(predicted) | Chlorophyll (mg/l)(experimental) | Chlorophyll (mg/l)(predicted) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.0 | 3.33 | 10 | 53.07 | 51.49 | 1.016 | 1.415 |
| 2 | 8.0 | 3.33 | 10 | 80.00 | 75.52 | 5.240 | 5.083 |
| 3 | 4.0 | 10.00 | 10 | 33.95 | 33.39 | 3.499 | 3.095 |
| 4 | 8.0 | 10.00 | 10 | 74.37 | 69.20 | 5.064 | 5.457 |
| 5 | 4.0 | 3.33 | 30 | 78.07 | 79.73 | 5.263 | 4.947 |
| 6 | 8.0 | 3.33 | 30 | 86.32 | 83.38 | 4.614 | 5.095 |
| 7 | 4.0 | 10.00 | 30 | 57.93 | 58.90 | 3.484 | 3.717 |
| 8 | 8.0 | 10.00 | 30 | 76.25 | 74.33 | 2.880 | 2.558 |
| 9 | 2.6 | 6.66 | 20 | 53.07 | 51.11 | 1.461 | 1.550 |
| 10 | 9.4 | 6.66 | 20 | 77.37 | 84.29 | 3.858 | 3.661 |
| 11 | 6.0 | 1.06 | 20 | 75.42 | 78.07 | 4.475 | 4.270 |
| 12 | 6.0 | 12.27 | 20 | 52.98 | 55.25 | 3.452 | 3.549 |
| 13 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 3.18 | 43.75 | 49.07 | 4.906 | 4.806 |
| 14 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 36.81 | 77.50 | 77.13 | 5.347 | 5.339 |
| 15 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 | 67.10 | 66.96 | 2.895 | 2.898 |
| 16 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 | 67.10 | 66.96 | 2.895 | 2.898 |
| 17 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 | 67.10 | 66.96 | 2.895 | 2.898 |
| 18 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 | 67.10 | 66.96 | 2.895 | 2.898 |
| 19 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 | 67.10 | 66.96 | 2.895 | 2.898 |
| 20 | 6.0 | 6.66 | 20 | 67.10 | 66.96 | 2.895 | 2.898 |
ANOVA for fit of CO2 removal (%) from central composite design
| Sources of variation | Sum of squares | Degree of freedom | Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | 3266.42 | 9 | 358.49 | 22.37 | 0.0000 |
| Residuals | 159.50 | 10 | 16.02 | ||
| Total | 3386.65 |
R (pred.)2 = 95.27 %; R (adj.)2 = 91.01 %
ANOVA for fit of chlorophyll estimation from central composite design
| Sources of variation | Sum of squares | Degrees of freedom | Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | 27.8792 | 9 | 3.09769 | 28.24 | 0.000 |
| Residuals | 1.0999 | 10 | 0.10999 | ||
| Total | 28.9791 |
R (pred.)2 = 96.20 %; R (adj.)2 = 92.79 %
Estimated regression coefficients for CO2 removal (%)
| Term | Coefficient | Standard error |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 67.6120 | 1.6323 | 41.415 | 0.000 |
|
| 9.8638 | 1.083 | 9.107 | 0.000 |
|
| −6.7875 | 1.083 | −6.266 | 0.000 |
|
| 8.3419 | 1.083 | 7.701 | 0.000 |
|
| 0.0318 | 1.054 | 0.030 | 0.977 |
|
| −0.3245 | 1.054 | −0.308 | 0.765 |
|
| −1.5856 | 1.054 | −1.504 | 0.164 |
|
| 2.9458 | 1.415 | 2.081 | 0.064 |
|
| −5.0963 | 1.415 | −3.601 | 0.005 |
|
| −0.6830 | 1.415 | −0.483 | 0.640 |
Estimated regression coefficients for chlorophyll
| Term | Coefficient | Standard error |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.9031 | 0.13526 | 21.463 | 0.000 |
|
| 0.6274 | 0.08974 | 6.991 | 0.000 |
|
| −0.2143 | 0.08974 | −2.388 | 0.038 |
|
| 0.1584 | 0.08974 | 1.765 | 0.108 |
|
| −0.1050 | 0.08736 | −1.202 | 0.257 |
|
| 0.3559 | 0.08736 | 4.074 | 0.002 |
|
| 0.7672 | 0.08736 | 8.781 | 0.000 |
|
| −0.3266 | 0.11726 | −2.786 | 0.019 |
|
| −0.8803 | 0.11726 | −7.513 | 0.000 |
|
| −0.7276 | 0.11726 | −6.210 | 0.000 |
Fig. 3Surface plot for CO2 removal (%). a Conc. of NaHCO3 (g/l), pH. b Inoculum size (%), pH. c Inoculum size (%), Conc. of NaHCO3 (g/l)
Fig. 4Surface plot for chlorophyll (mg/l). a Conc. of NaHCO3 (g/l), pH. b Inoculum size (%), pH. c Inoculum size (%), Conc. of NaHCO3 (g/l)