Lesley A Ross1, Sara A Freed1, Jerri D Edwards2, Christine B Phillips1, Karlene Ball3. 1. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. 2. School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Abstract
Purpose of the Study: Driving is important for older adults' health and well-being, yet little research has examined interventions to maintain driving mobility. As fluid cognitive abilities are strongly linked to driving, targeted cognitive training interventions may impact driving mobility longitudinally. This study assessed the effects of three different cognitive training programs (reasoning, speed of processing, and memory) on driving cessation in older adults across 10 years (n = 2,390). Design and Methods: Cox regression analyses evaluated the impact of each program relative to a no-contact control group with intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses. The effects of randomization to additional booster sessions were also examined. Subsample analyses repeated these models in participants who were at-risk for driving mobility declines. Results: There were no training (n = 2,390) or booster training (n = 1,540) effects on driving cessation with ITT analyses. Individuals at-risk for future mobility declines were 49% (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.94; n = 336) less likely to cease driving after speed of processing training and 55% (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.86; n = 324) less likely to quit driving subsequent to reasoning training. Additional booster sessions for speed of processing training resulted in a 70% reduction of driving cessation (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.82; n = 252) in the subsample analyses. There were no significant effects of memory training. Implications: Some cognitive interventions transfer to maintained driving among those at-risk for mobility declines due to cognitive impairment. Future research should identify moderators and mediators of training and transfer effects.
RCT Entities:
Purpose of the Study: Driving is important for older adults' health and well-being, yet little research has examined interventions to maintain driving mobility. As fluid cognitive abilities are strongly linked to driving, targeted cognitive training interventions may impact driving mobility longitudinally. This study assessed the effects of three different cognitive training programs (reasoning, speed of processing, and memory) on driving cessation in older adults across 10 years (n = 2,390). Design and Methods:Cox regression analyses evaluated the impact of each program relative to a no-contact control group with intent-to-treat (ITT) analyses. The effects of randomization to additional booster sessions were also examined. Subsample analyses repeated these models in participants who were at-risk for driving mobility declines. Results: There were no training (n = 2,390) or booster training (n = 1,540) effects on driving cessation with ITT analyses. Individuals at-risk for future mobility declines were 49% (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28, 0.94; n = 336) less likely to cease driving after speed of processing training and 55% (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.86; n = 324) less likely to quit driving subsequent to reasoning training. Additional booster sessions for speed of processing training resulted in a 70% reduction of driving cessation (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.82; n = 252) in the subsample analyses. There were no significant effects of memory training. Implications: Some cognitive interventions transfer to maintained driving among those at-risk for mobility declines due to cognitive impairment. Future research should identify moderators and mediators of training and transfer effects.
Authors: Jerri D Edwards; Lesley A Ross; Michelle L Ackerman; Brent J Small; Karlene K Ball; Stacy Bradley; Joan E Dodson Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Fredric D Wolinsky; Frederick W Unverzagt; David M Smith; Richard Jones; Anne Stoddard; Sharon L Tennstedt Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jerri D Edwards; Martinique Perkins; Lesley A Ross; Sandra L Reynolds Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Lesley A Ross; Christina E Webb; Christine Whitaker; Jarrod M Hicks; Erica L Schmidt; Shaadee Samimy; Nancy A Dennis; Kristina M Visscher Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2019-09-15 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Briana N Sprague; Sara A Freed; Christina E Webb; Christine B Phillips; Jinshil Hyun; Lesley A Ross Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Claudia C von Bastian; Alice Reinhartz; Robert C Udale; Stéphanie Grégoire; Mehdi Essounni; Sylvie Belleville; Tilo Strobach Journal: BMC Psychol Date: 2022-07-08