Literature DB >> 28329330

Three-port (one incision plus two-port) endoscopic mitral valve surgery without robotic assistance.

Toshiaki Ito, Atsuo Maekawa, Satoshi Hoshino, Yasunari Hayashi, Sadanari Sawaki, Junji Yanagisawa, Masayoshi Tokoro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Totally endoscopic minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is technically demanding and often performed with robotic assistance. We hypothesized that three-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) would facilitate endoscopic MIMVS and evaluated its feasibility and safety.
METHODS: From October 2010 to June 2016, we performed first-time MIMVS in 250 consecutive patients (122 male), with median age of 65 years (54-73 years, 25-75 percentile). The thoracic access ports comprised one small (3-5 cm) thoracotomy without a rib spreader plus two trocars (one for the endoscope and one for left-handed instruments), thus establishing triangular three-port VATS. Cannulas, an aortic clamp, and a left atrial retractor were inserted through the thoracotomy, and right-handed instruments were inserted through the remaining space. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established through a groin incision.
RESULTS: The etiology of the mitral valve lesion was myxomatous degeneration in 70% of patients, rheumatic disease in 9%, infectious endocarditis in 6%, and other conditions in 15%. Mitral valve repair was performed in 233 patients and replacement in 27. Two patients underwent conversion to replacement after attempted repair. Forty-nine patients underwent tricuspid annuloplasty, and 45 underwent the Maze procedure. One in-hospital death occurred within 30 days. Two patients developed stroke, three underwent re-exploration for bleeding, one developed low output syndrome, and one required new haemodialysis. The aortic clamp, bypass, and total operation times were 119 (94-149), 166 (134-200) and 237 (204-285) min, respectively, median (25-75%). The 5-year survival and reoperation-free rates were 98.3% ± 0.9% and 96.9% ± 1.2%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-port endoscopic MIMVS appears reproducible and safe.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscope; Minimally invasive surgery; Mitral valve

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28329330     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  5 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Japan: history and current status.

Authors:  Kazuma Okamoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-07-17

2.  Three-port totally endoscopic repair vs conventional median sternotomy for atrial septal defect.

Authors:  Junji Yanagisawa; Atsuo Maekawa; Sadanari Sawaki; Masayoshi Tokoro; Takahiro Ozeki; Mamoru Orii; Toshiyuki Saiga; Toshiaki Ito
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  [Comparison of quality of life and long-term outcomes following mitral valve replacement through robotically assisted versus median sternotomy approach].

Authors:  Haizhi Zhao; Huajun Zhang; Ming Yang; Cangsong Xiao; Yao Wang; Changqing Gao; Rong Wang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2020-11-30

4.  Minimally Invasive Video-assisted Mitral Valve Replacement with a Right Chest Small Incision in Patients Aged Over 65 Years.

Authors:  Qiang Chen; Ling-Li Yu; Qi-Liang Zhang; Hua Cao; Liang-Wan Chen; Zhong-Yao Huang
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-08-27

5.  Robotic mitral valve replacements with bioprosthetic valves in 52 patients: experience from a tertiary referral hospital.

Authors:  Chia-Cheng Kuo; Hsiao-Huang Chang; Chung-Hsi Hsing; Hiong-Ping Hii; Nan-Chun Wu; Chin-Ming Hsu; Chun-I Chen; Bor-Chih Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.