Literature DB >> 2832913

Infection of cattle by airborne foot-and-mouth disease virus: minimal doses with O1 and SAT 2 strains.

A I Donaldson1, C F Gibson, R Oliver, C Hamblin, R P Kitching.   

Abstract

Equipment has been constructed and methods developed for exposing individual cattle to two strains of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus in aerosols to determine the minimal infective dose by the respiratory route. The aerosols used were produced either artificially by a spinning-top aerosol generator, in which case they were of homogeneous small particle size (less than 3 micron in diameter) or else they were derived naturally from infected pigs, in which case the particles were heterogeneous in size. Two strains of FMD virus were used: an O1 strain of UK origin and a SAT 2 strain from South Africa. The lowest doses which initiated infection were 12.5 TCID50 of O1 BFS virus and 25 TCID50 of SAT 2 virus, infectivity having been assayed in primary bovine thyroid cell cultures. Following exposure to low doses of virus (range 12 to 316 TCID50) 33 per cent of the cattle exposed to O1 BFS virus and 27 per cent exposed to SAT 2 virus were infected but did not develop detectable vesicular lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2832913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Vet Sci        ISSN: 0034-5288            Impact factor:   2.534


  17 in total

1.  The epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease in Saskatchewan, Canada, 1951-1952.

Authors:  R F Sellers; S M Daggupaty
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 2.  Methods for sampling of airborne viruses.

Authors:  Daniel Verreault; Sylvain Moineau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease in Saskatchewan, Canada, 1951-1952.

Authors:  S M Daggupaty; R F Sellers
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Optimization of a sampling system for recovery and detection of airborne porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and swine influenza virus.

Authors:  J R Hermann; S J Hoff; K J Yoon; A C Burkhardt; R B Evans; J J Zimmerman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  A review of the possible mechanisms for the persistence of foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Authors:  E L Woodbury
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Rapid selection of genetic and antigenic variants of foot-and-mouth disease virus during persistence in cattle.

Authors:  F Gebauer; J C de la Torre; I Gomes; M G Mateu; H Barahona; B Tiraboschi; I Bergmann; P A de Mello; E Domingo
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Predicting infection risk of airborne foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  David Schley; Laura Burgin; John Gloster
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  A Brief Review on Diagnosis of Foot-and-Mouth Disease of Livestock: Conventional to Molecular Tools.

Authors:  Neeta Longjam; Rajib Deb; A K Sarmah; Tilling Tayo; V B Awachat; V K Saxena
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2011-07-06

9.  Topographic determinants of foot and mouth disease transmission in the UK 2001 epidemic.

Authors:  Nicholas J Savill; Darren J Shaw; Rob Deardon; Michael J Tildesley; Matthew J Keeling; Mark E J Woolhouse; Stephen P Brooks; Bryan T Grenfell
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Concentration, Size Distribution, and Infectivity of Airborne Particles Carrying Swine Viruses.

Authors:  Carmen Alonso; Peter C Raynor; Peter R Davies; Montserrat Torremorell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.