Literature DB >> 28329118

Comparison of surgical approach and extent of resection for Masaoka-Koga Stage I and II thymic tumours in Europe, North America and Asia: an International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group retrospective database analysis.

Wentao Fang1, Xiaopan Yao2, Alberto Antonicelli2, Zhitao Gu1, Frank Detterbeck2, Eric Vallières3, Ralph W Aye3, Alexander S Farivar3, James Huang4, Yue Shang5, Brian E Louie3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Surgeons at different institutions worldwide choose different types of operations for thymic tumours. It is not known whether these differences affect the outcomes of the patients.
METHODS: A total of 1430 patients with Masaoka-Koga pathological Stage I-II thymic tumours without myasthenia gravis or pre-treatment were identified from the International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group retrospective database. Outcomes of patients from 3 major continents (Europe, North America and Asia) were compared.
RESULTS: Patients from the 3 continents were comparable in gender and performance status. More European patients had more paraneoplastic syndromes; North American patients had the smallest tumour sizes and less adjuvant therapy; and Asian patients were younger and had more Stage I disease but higher grade tumours. Partial thymectomy was performed more often in Asian patients (31.7%) than in European (2.4%) and North American (5.4%; P  < 0.001) patients. The median approach (sternotomy/clamshell) was the major approach in Europe (75.3%) and North America (76.6%). In contrast, the median approach was applied significantly less frequently in Asia (45.6%, P  < 0.001); unilateral open (thoracotomy/hemi-clamshell, 23.3%) and minimally invasive approaches (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery/robot, 31.1%) were used more often with similar rates of complete resection. The 10-year overall survival rate was 82% for Europe, 78% for North America and 90% for Asia ( P  = 0.005), respectively. The 10-year cumulative recurrence rates were similar among the geographic groups (European 0.08, North American 0.07, and Asian 0.06, P  = 0.61). Age was the only independent predictive factor for overall survival ( P  < 0.001, HR = 1.089, 95% CI 1.056-1.123) in multivariable analysis. Types B3 and thymic carcinoma ( P  = 0.003, HR = 3.932, 95% CI 1.615-9.576) were independent risk factors for increased recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the selection of the surgical approach and the extent of resection for Stage I and II thymic tumours differ by geographic region. However, these differences seem to have little impact on outcomes.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geography; Resection extent; Surgery; Surgical approach; Thymic epithelial tumours

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28329118      PMCID: PMC6279116          DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  15 in total

1.  J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper. Role of staging in prognosis and management of thymoma.

Authors:  E W Wilkins; H C Grillo; J G Scannell; A C Moncure; D J Mathisen
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Predictors of recurrence in thymic tumors: importance of invasion, World Health Organization histology, and size.

Authors:  Cameron D Wright; John C Wain; Daniel R Wong; Dean M Donahue; Henning A Gaissert; Hermes C Grillo; Douglas J Mathisen
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  Standard outcome measures for thymic malignancies.

Authors:  James Huang; Frank C Detterbeck; Zuoheng Wang; Patrick J Loehrer
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  MYASTHENIA GRAVIS AND TUMORS OF THE THYMIC REGION: REPORT OF A CASE IN WHICH THE TUMOR WAS REMOVED.

Authors:  A Blalock; M F Mason; H J Morgan; S S Riven
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1939-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Standard terms, definitions, and policies for minimally invasive resection of thymoma.

Authors:  Alper Toker; Joshua Sonett; Marcin Zielinski; Federico Rea; Victor Tomulescu; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Matched-pair comparison of three different approaches for thymectomy in myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  J C Rückert; H K Sobel; S Göhring; K M Einhäupl; J M Müller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Determinants of Complete Resection of Thymoma by Minimally Invasive and Open Thymectomy: Analysis of an International Registry.

Authors:  Bryan M Burt; Xiaopan Yao; Joseph Shrager; Alberto Antonicelli; Sukhmani Padda; Jonathan Reiss; Heather Wakelee; Stacey Su; James Huang; Walter Scott
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Limited thymectomy for stage I or II thymomas.

Authors:  Takuya Onuki; Shigemi Ishikawa; Kesato Iguchi; Yukinobu Goto; Mitsuaki Sakai; Masaharu Inagaki; Tatsuo Yamamoto; Masataka Onizuka; Yukio Sato; Kiyoshi Ohara; Yuzuru Sakakibara
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 9.  Thymoma: current diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Ahmad Zeeshan
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Unilateral thoracoscopic subtotal thymectomy for the treatment of stage I and II thymoma.

Authors:  Makoto Odaka; Tadashi Akiba; Mitsuo Yabe; Miyako Hiramatsu; Hideki Matsudaira; Jun Hirano; Toshiaki Morikawa
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 4.191

View more
  8 in total

1.  VATS thymectomy for early stage thymoma and myasthenia gravis: combined right-sided uniportal and left-sided three-portal approach.

Authors:  Maurizio Infante; Cristiano Benato; Riccardo Giovannetti; Cinzia Bonadiman; Barbara Canneto; Giovanni Falezza; Alessandro Lonardoni; Paola Gandini
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-10-18

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery in thymic malignances: the new standard of care.

Authors:  Xuefei Zhang; Zhitao Gu; Wentao Fang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy.

Authors:  Katie E O'Sullivan; Usha S Kreaden; April E Hebert; Donna Eaton; Karen C Redmond
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-03

4.  Thoracoscopic thymectomy with partial superior vena cava resection for locally advanced thymomas.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Zhitao Gu; Chunyu Ji; Xuefei Zhang; Tangbing Chen; Wentao Fang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Optimal management of thymic malignancies: current perspectives.

Authors:  Gabrielle Drevet; Stéphane Collaud; François Tronc; Nicolas Girard; Jean-Michel Maury
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Dual-scopic robotic thymectomy for a large thymic malignant tumor.

Authors:  Masahiro Yanagiya; Noriko Hiyama; Jun Matsumoto
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-06-30

7.  [Minimally Invasive Surgery in Thymic Malignances].

Authors:  Wentao Fang; Zhitao Gu; Keneng Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2018-04-20

8.  Intermediate oncologic outcomes after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for early-stage thymoma.

Authors:  Stevan S Pupovac; Joshua Newman; Paul C Lee; Miguel Alexis; Julissa Jurado; Kevin Hyman; Lawrence Glassman; David Zeltsman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.005

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.