Bhakti Hansoti1,2, Peter Hodkinson2, Lee Wallis2. 1. From the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 2. Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Childhood mortality remains unacceptably high. In low-resource settings, children with critical illness often present for care. Current triage strategies are time consuming and require trained health care workers. To address this limitation, our team developed a simple subjective tool, SCREEN (Sick Children Require Emergency Evaluation Now), which is easy to administer, to identify critically ill children. This article presents the development of the SCREEN program and evaluates its performance when compared with other commonly implemented triage tools in low-resource settings. METHODS: We measured the sensitivity and specificity of SCREEN, to identify critically ill children, compared with 4 other previously validated triage tools: the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses, the Pediatric Early Warning, the Pediatric South African Triage Scale, and the World Health Organization Emergency Triage Treatment Tool. FINDINGS: SCREEN has high sensitivity (100%-98.73%; P < 0.001) and specificity (64.41%-50.71%; P < 0.001) when compared with other validated triage tools. CONCLUSIONS: The SCREEN tool may offer a simple and effective method to identify critically ill children in low-resource environments.
OBJECTIVE: Childhood mortality remains unacceptably high. In low-resource settings, children with critical illness often present for care. Current triage strategies are time consuming and require trained health care workers. To address this limitation, our team developed a simple subjective tool, SCREEN (Sick Children Require Emergency Evaluation Now), which is easy to administer, to identify critically ill children. This article presents the development of the SCREEN program and evaluates its performance when compared with other commonly implemented triage tools in low-resource settings. METHODS: We measured the sensitivity and specificity of SCREEN, to identify critically ill children, compared with 4 other previously validated triage tools: the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses, the Pediatric Early Warning, the Pediatric South African Triage Scale, and the World Health Organization Emergency Triage Treatment Tool. FINDINGS: SCREEN has high sensitivity (100%-98.73%; P < 0.001) and specificity (64.41%-50.71%; P < 0.001) when compared with other validated triage tools. CONCLUSIONS: The SCREEN tool may offer a simple and effective method to identify critically ill children in low-resource environments.
Authors: Bhakti Hansoti; Alexander Jenson; Antony G Kironji; Joanne Katz; Scott Levin; Richard Rothman; Gabor D Kelen; Lee A Wallis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Johanna Dekker-Boersema; Jonas Hector; Laura Frances Jefferys; Clemência Binamo; Deavis Camilo; Gerard Muganga; Mussa Manuel Aly; Ernesto Belario Rafael Langa; Penelope Vounatsou; Michael André Hobbins Journal: Afr J Emerg Med Date: 2019-07-02