Literature DB >> 28327900

Awake Craniotomy vs Craniotomy Under General Anesthesia for Perirolandic Gliomas: Evaluating Perioperative Complications and Extent of Resection.

Chikezie I Eseonu1, Jordina Rincon-Torroella1, Karim ReFaey1, Young M Lee1, Jasvinder Nangiana1, Tito Vivas-Buitrago1, Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A craniotomy with direct cortical/subcortical stimulation either awake or under general anesthesia (GA) present 2 approaches for removing eloquent region tumors. With a reported higher prevalence of intraoperative seizures occurring during awake resections of perirolandic lesions, oftentimes, surgery under GA is chosen for these lesions.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a single-surgeon's experience with awake craniotomies (AC) vs surgery under GA for resecting perirolandic, eloquent, motor-region gliomas.
METHODS: Between 2005 and 2015, a retrospective analysis of 27 patients with perirolandic, eloquent, motor-area gliomas that underwent an AC were case-control matched with 31 patients who underwent surgery under GA for gliomas in the same location. All patients underwent direct brain stimulation with neuromonitoring and perioperative risk factors, extent of resection, complications, and discharge status were assessed.
RESULTS: The postoperative Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was significantly lower for the GA patients at 81.1 compared to the AC patients at 93.3 ( P = .040). The extent of resection for GA patients was 79.6% while the AC patients had an 86.3% resection ( P = .136). There were significantly more 100% total resections in the AC patients 25.9% compared to the GA group (6.5%; P = .041). Patients in the GA group had a longer mean length of hospitalization of 7.9 days compared to the AC group at 4.2 days ( P = .049).
CONCLUSION: We show that AC can be performed with more frequent total resections, better postoperative KPS, shorter hospitalizations, as well as similar perioperative complication rates compared to surgery under GA for perirolandic, eloquent motor-region glioma.
Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Awake craniotomy; Cortical stimulation mapping; Glioblastoma; Glioma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28327900     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  29 in total

1.  Potential differences between monolingual and bilingual patients in approach and outcome after awake brain surgery.

Authors:  Karim ReFaey; Shashwat Tripathi; Adip G Bhargav; Sanjeet S Grewal; Erik H Middlebrooks; David S Sabsevitz; Mark Jentoft; Peter Brunner; Adela Wu; William O Tatum; Anthony Ritaccio; Kaisorn L Chaichana; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  High-frequency oscillations in awake patients undergoing brain tumor-related epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Anteneh M Feyissa; Gregory A Worrell; William O Tatum; Deependra Mahato; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Steven S Rosenfeld; Karim ReFaey; Perry S Bechtle; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Comparative volumetric analysis of the extent of resection of molecularly and histologically distinct low grade gliomas and its role on survival.

Authors:  Chikezie I Eseonu; Francisco Eguia; Karim ReFaey; Oscar Garcia; Fausto J Rodriguez; Kaisorn Chaichana; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  What effects does awake craniotomy have on functional and survival outcomes for glioblastoma patients?

Authors:  Anne Clavreul; Ghislaine Aubin; Matthieu Delion; Jean-Michel Lemée; Aram Ter Minassian; Philippe Menei
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Tumor location-based classification of surgery-related language impairments in patients with glioma.

Authors:  Shengyu Fang; Yuchao Liang; Lianwang Li; Lei Wang; Xing Fan; Yinyan Wang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  How Intraoperative Tools and Techniques Have Changed the Approach to Brain Tumor Surgery.

Authors:  Parastou Fatemi; Michael Zhang; Kai J Miller; Pierre Robe; Gordon Li
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Comparative Cost Analysis of Endoscopic versus Microscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenomas.

Authors:  Chikezie Ikechukwu Eseonu; Karim ReFaey; Oscar Garcia; Roberto Salvatori; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-08-08

8.  Intraoperative Seizure Detection During Active Resection of Glioblastoma Through a Novel Hollow Circular Electrocorticography Array.

Authors:  Ricardo A Domingo; Tito Vivas-Buitrago; Gaetano De Biase; Erik H Middlebrooks; Perry S Bechtle; David S Sabsevitz; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; William O Tatum
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.703

9.  Impact of awake mapping on overall survival and extent of resection in patients with adult diffuse gliomas within or near eloquent areas: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis of awake craniotomy vs. general anesthesia.

Authors:  Atsushi Fukui; Yoshihiro Muragaki; Taiichi Saito; Masayuki Nitta; Shunsuke Tsuzuki; Hidetsugu Asano; Takakazu Kawamata
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Feasibility, Safety and Impact on Overall Survival of Awake Resection for Newly Diagnosed Supratentorial IDH-Wildtype Glioblastomas in Adults.

Authors:  Alessandro Moiraghi; Alexandre Roux; Sophie Peeters; Jean-Baptiste Pelletier; Marwan Baroud; Bénédicte Trancart; Catherine Oppenheim; Emmanuèle Lechapt; Chiara Benevello; Eduardo Parraga; Pascale Varlet; Fabrice Chrétien; Edouard Dezamis; Marc Zanello; Johan Pallud
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.