Literature DB >> 28327804

Efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate versus N-methylglucamine antimoniate in pediatric visceral leishmaniasis: an open-label, randomized, and controlled pilot trial in Brazil.

Myrlena Mescouto Borges1,2, Maria Cristina da Silva Pranchevicius1, Elza Ferreira Noronha2, Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero2, César Omar Carranza-Tamayo2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite their high toxicity, antimonials and amphotericin B deoxycholate are commonly used for treating visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Few studies showing conflictive data about their efficacy and adverse events in pediatric population are available. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of amphotericin B deoxycholate vs. that of N-methylglucamine antimoniate in treating pediatric VL in Brazil.
METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, 2-arm and controlled pilot clinical trial. Treatment naïve children and adolescents with VL without signs of severe illness were treated with N-methylglucamine antimoniate (20mg/kg/day for 20 days) or amphotericin B deoxycholate (1 mg/kg/day for 14 days). All patients were diagnosed with positive direct examination and/or positive PCR for Leishmania spp. performed in bone marrow samples. The primary efficacy end-point was VL cure determined after 180 days of completion of treatment. The analysis was performed using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses.
RESULTS: In total, 101 volunteers were assessed. Efficacy was similar for both groups. The antimonial (n=51) and amphotericin B groups (n=50) had a cure rate of 94.1% and 100%, and 94% and 97.9% according to ITT and PP analyses, respectively. All patients reported adverse events (AE). Serious AE incidence was similar in both groups. Five individuals were excluded from the study because of severe adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: N-methylglucamine antimoniate and amphotericin B deoxycholate have similar efficacy and adverse events rate in pediatric patients with VL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28327804     DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0455-2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Soc Bras Med Trop        ISSN: 0037-8682            Impact factor:   1.581


  4 in total

Review 1.  Recent Development of Visceral Leishmaniasis Treatments: Successes, Pitfalls, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Fabiana Alves; Graeme Bilbe; Séverine Blesson; Vishal Goyal; Séverine Monnerat; Charles Mowbray; Gina Muthoni Ouattara; Bernard Pécoul; Suman Rijal; Joelle Rode; Alexandra Solomos; Nathalie Strub-Wourgaft; Monique Wasunna; Susan Wells; Eduard E Zijlstra; Byron Arana; Jorge Alvar
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Efficacy and safety of available treatments for visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil: A multicenter, randomized, open label trial.

Authors:  Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero; Dorcas Lamounier Costa; Carlos Henrique Nery Costa; Roque Pacheco de Almeida; Enaldo Viera de Melo; Sílvio Fernando Guimarães de Carvalho; Ana Rabello; Andréa Lucchesi de Carvalho; Anastácio de Queiroz Sousa; Robério Dias Leite; Simone Soares Lima; Thais Alves Amaral; Fabiana Piovesan Alves; Joelle Rode
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-06-29

3.  Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis secondary to visceral leishmaniasis in an endemic area in the north of Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Authors:  Fernando Henrique Guimarães de Carvalho; Jamille Fernandes Lula; Leandro de Freitas Teles; Antônio Prates Caldeira; Sílvio Fernando Guimarães de Carvalho
Journal:  Rev Soc Bras Med Trop       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 1.581

Review 4.  Visceral Leishmaniasis in West Africa: Clinical Characteristics, Vectors, and Reservoirs.

Authors:  Abdoulaye K Kone; Doumbo Safiatou Niaré; Martine Piarroux; Arezki Izri; Pierre Marty; Matthew B Laurens; Renaud Piarroux; Mahamadou A Thera; Ogobara K Doumbo
Journal:  J Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-09-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.