Literature DB >> 28327449

Integrated local binary pattern texture features for classification of breast tissue imaged by optical coherence microscopy.

Sunhua Wan1, Hsiang-Chieh Lee2, Xiaolei Huang3, Ting Xu1, Tao Xu4, Xianxu Zeng5, Zhan Zhang6, Yuri Sheikine7, James L Connolly7, James G Fujimoto2, Chao Zhou8.   

Abstract

This paper proposes a texture analysis technique that can effectively classify different types of human breast tissue imaged by Optical Coherence Microscopy (OCM). OCM is an emerging imaging modality for rapid tissue screening and has the potential to provide high resolution microscopic images that approach those of histology. OCM images, acquired without tissue staining, however, pose unique challenges to image analysis and pattern classification. We examined multiple types of texture features and found Local Binary Pattern (LBP) features to perform better in classifying tissues imaged by OCM. In order to improve classification accuracy, we propose novel variants of LBP features, namely average LBP (ALBP) and block based LBP (BLBP). Compared with the classic LBP feature, ALBP and BLBP features provide an enhanced encoding of the texture structure in a local neighborhood by looking at intensity differences among neighboring pixels and among certain blocks of pixels in the neighborhood. Fourty-six freshly excised human breast tissue samples, including 27 benign (e.g. fibroadenoma, fibrocystic disease and usual ductal hyperplasia) and 19 breast carcinoma (e.g. invasive ductal carcinoma, ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ) were imaged with large field OCM with an imaging area of 10 × 10 mm2 (10, 000 × 10, 000 pixels) for each sample. Corresponding H&E histology was obtained for each sample and used to provide ground truth diagnosis. 4310 small OCM image blocks (500 × 500 pixels) each paired with corresponding H&E histology was extracted from large-field OCM images and labeled with one of the five different classes: adipose tissue (n = 347), fibrous stroma (n = 2,065), breast lobules (n = 199), carcinomas (pooled from all sub-types, n = 1,127), and background (regions outside of the specimens, n = 572). Our experiments show that by integrating a selected set of LBP and the two new variant (ALBP and BLBP) features at multiple scales, the classification accuracy increased from 81.7% (using LBP features alone) to 93.8% using a neural network classifier. The integrated feature was also used to classify large-field OCM images for tumor detection. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was obtained with an area under the curve value of 0.959. A sensitivity level of 100% and specificity level of 85.2% was achieved to differentiate benign from malignant samples. Several other experiments also demonstrate the complementary nature of LBP and the two variants (ALBP and BLBP features) and the significance of integrating these texture features for classification. Using features from multiple scales and performing feature selection are also effective mechanisms to improve accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Local binary patterns; Optical coherence microscopy; Texture features; Tissue classification

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28327449      PMCID: PMC5479412          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2017.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  49 in total

Review 1.  Optical coherence tomography: feasibility for basic research and image-guided surgery of breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen A Boppart; Wei Luo; Daniel L Marks; Keith W Singletary
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Applications of optical coherence tomography in dermatology.

Authors:  Thilo Gambichler; Georg Moussa; Michael Sand; Daniel Sand; Peter Altmeyer; Klaus Hoffmann
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 4.563

3.  A sparse texture representation using local affine regions.

Authors:  Svetlana Lazebnik; Cordelia Schmid; Jean Ponce
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Computational methods for analysis of human breast tumor tissue in optical coherence tomography images.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Optical biopsy in human urologic tissue using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  G J Tearney; M E Brezinski; J F Southern; B E Bouma; S A Boppart; J G Fujimoto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Cellular resolution ex vivo imaging of gastrointestinal tissues with optical coherence microscopy.

Authors:  Aaron D Aguirre; Yu Chen; Bradley Bryan; Hiroshi Mashimo; Qin Huang; James L Connolly; James G Fujimoto
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Real-time Imaging of the Resection Bed Using a Handheld Probe to Reduce Incidence of Microscopic Positive Margins in Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Sarah J Erickson-Bhatt; Ryan M Nolan; Nathan D Shemonski; Steven G Adie; Jeffrey Putney; Donald Darga; Daniel T McCormick; Andrew J Cittadine; Adam M Zysk; Marina Marjanovic; Eric J Chaney; Guillermo L Monroy; Fredrick A South; Kimberly A Cradock; Z George Liu; Magesh Sundaram; Partha S Ray; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Intraoperative Assessment of Final Margins with a Handheld Optical Imaging Probe During Breast-Conserving Surgery May Reduce the Reoperation Rate: Results of a Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Kai Chen; Edward Gabrielson; Lorraine Tafra; Evelyn A May Gonzalez; Joseph K Canner; Eric B Schneider; Andrew J Cittadine; P Scott Carney; Stephen A Boppart; Kimiko Tsuchiya; Kristen Sawyer; Lisa K Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Integrated optical coherence tomography and optical coherence microscopy imaging of ex vivo human renal tissues.

Authors:  Hsiang-Chieh Lee; Chao Zhou; David W Cohen; Amy E Mondelblatt; Yihong Wang; Aaron D Aguirre; Dejun Shen; Yuri Sheikine; James G Fujimoto; James L Connolly
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Deep Filter Banks for Texture Recognition, Description, and Segmentation.

Authors:  Mircea Cimpoi; Subhransu Maji; Iasonas Kokkinos; Andrea Vedaldi
Journal:  Int J Comput Vis       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 7.410

View more
  6 in total

1.  Automated assessment of breast margins in deep ultraviolet fluorescence images using texture analysis.

Authors:  Tongtong Lu; Julie M Jorns; Dong Hye Ye; Mollie Patton; Renee Fisher; Amanda Emmrich; Taly Gilat Schmidt; Tina Yen; Bing Yu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  Features extraction using encoded local binary pattern for detection and grading diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Mohamed A Berbar
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2022-06-29

3.  Optical coherence tomography and computer-aided diagnosis of a murine model of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Bohan Wang; Hsing-Wen Wang; Hengchang Guo; Erik Anderson; Qinggong Tang; Tongtong Wu; Reuben Falola; Tikina Smith; Peter M Andrews; Yu Chen
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 4.  Involvement of Machine Learning for Breast Cancer Image Classification: A Survey.

Authors:  Abdullah-Al Nahid; Yinan Kong
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-12-31       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  An Automatic Classification Method on Chronic Venous Insufficiency Images.

Authors:  Qiang Shi; Weiya Chen; Ye Pan; Shan Yin; Yan Fu; Jiacai Mei; Zhidong Xue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Classification of oral salivary gland tumors based on texture features in optical coherence tomography images.

Authors:  Zihan Yang; Jianwei Shang; Chenlu Liu; Jun Zhang; Yanmei Liang
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.161

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.