Literature DB >> 28326693

Measuring consumer outcomes: Development and testing of the Australian Community Care Outcomes Measure.

Beatriz Cardona1, Michael Fine1, Adam Stebbing1, Cathy Duncan2, Peter Samsa2, Kathy Eagar2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In the increasingly competitive environment of aged care in Australasia, how can providers and consumers be sure that the care support delivered is efficient and makes a positive difference? Monitoring outcomes has long been emphasised for ensuring quality service delivery, yet there is currently no consistently applied approach available.
METHODS: This paper considers the importance of measuring outcomes in community care and reports on the development and field trial of the Australian Community Care Outcomes Measure (ACCOM). The ACCOM combines data already collected by services on the capabilities and care needs of individual consumers and their demographic characteristics with a short questionnaire on quality of life based on the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT). It is completed by consumers and staff.
RESULTS: In the first round of a field test of the ACCOM (2016), baseline data were successfully collected for over 200 individual aged care clients, each receiving consumer-directed care (CDC) packages at home. Results show the measure to be practical and easy to use. A second round to measure change and enable the calculation of outcomes for each consumer was successfully completed 6 months later.
CONCLUSION: Field testing of the ACCOM shows promising results. More extensive trials of the measure are planned across Australia.
© 2017 AJA Inc.

Keywords:  Australia; community health services; health services for the aged; outcomes; quality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28326693     DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas J Ageing        ISSN: 1440-6381            Impact factor:   2.111


  5 in total

1.  Measuring outcomes of community aged care programs: challenges, opportunities and the Australian Community Outcomes Measurement ACCOM tool.

Authors:  Beatriz Cardona
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.186

2.  Systematic review of 29 self-report instruments for assessing quality of life in older adults receiving aged care services.

Authors:  Joyce Siette; Gilbert Thomas Knaggs; Yvonne Zurynski; Julie Ratcliffe; Laura Dodds; Johanna Westbrook
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The Smarter Safer Homes Solution to Support Older People Living in Their Own Homes Through Enhanced Care Models: Protocol for a Stratified Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Marlien Varnfield; Liesel Higgins; Vanessa Smallbon; Julia Bomke; John O'Dwyer; Joshua M Byrnes; Melissa Sum; Jennifer Hewitt; Wei Lu; Mohanraj Karunanithi
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-01-24

4.  Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long-term care at home programmes.

Authors:  Lyn Phillipson; Ann-Marie Towers; James Caiels; Louisa Smith
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 5.  Quality indicators for home- and community-based aged care: A critical literature review to inform policy directions.

Authors:  Hui Yuan Foong; Joyce Siette; Mikaela Jorgensen
Journal:  Australas J Ageing       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 1.876

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.