Jennifer H Suor1, Melissa L Sturge-Apple1, Patrick T Davies1, Dante Cicchetti2,3. 1. Department of Clinical and Social Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. 2. Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 3. Mt. Hope Family Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Harsh environments are known to predict deficits in children's cognitive abilities. Life history theory approaches challenge this interpretation, proposing stressed children's cognition becomes specialized to solve problems in fitness-enhancing ways. The goal of this study was to examine associations between early environmental harshness and children's problem-solving outcomes across tasks varying in ecological relevance. In addition, we utilize an evolutionary model of temperament toward further specifying whether hawk temperament traits moderate these associations. METHODS: Two hundred and one mother-child dyads participated in a prospective multimethod study when children were 2 and 4 years old. At age 2, environmental harshness was assessed via maternal report of earned income and observations of maternal disengagement during a parent-child interaction task. Children's hawk temperament traits were assessed from a series of unfamiliar episodes. At age 4, children's reward-oriented and visual problem-solving were measured. RESULTS: Path analyses revealed early environmental harshness and children's hawk temperament traits predicted worse visual problem-solving. Results showed a significant two-way interaction between children's hawk temperament traits and environmental harshness on reward-oriented problem-solving. Simple slope analyses revealed the effect of environmental harshness on reward-oriented problem-solving was specific to children with higher levels of hawk traits. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest early experiences of environmental harshness and child hawk temperament traits shape children's trajectories of problem-solving in an environment-fitting manner.
BACKGROUND: Harsh environments are known to predict deficits in children's cognitive abilities. Life history theory approaches challenge this interpretation, proposing stressed children's cognition becomes specialized to solve problems in fitness-enhancing ways. The goal of this study was to examine associations between early environmental harshness and children's problem-solving outcomes across tasks varying in ecological relevance. In addition, we utilize an evolutionary model of temperament toward further specifying whether hawk temperament traits moderate these associations. METHODS: Two hundred and one mother-child dyads participated in a prospective multimethod study when children were 2 and 4 years old. At age 2, environmental harshness was assessed via maternal report of earned income and observations of maternal disengagement during a parent-child interaction task. Children's hawk temperament traits were assessed from a series of unfamiliar episodes. At age 4, children's reward-oriented and visual problem-solving were measured. RESULTS: Path analyses revealed early environmental harshness and children's hawk temperament traits predicted worse visual problem-solving. Results showed a significant two-way interaction between children's hawk temperament traits and environmental harshness on reward-oriented problem-solving. Simple slope analyses revealed the effect of environmental harshness on reward-oriented problem-solving was specific to children with higher levels of hawk traits. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest early experiences of environmental harshness and child hawk temperament traits shape children's trajectories of problem-solving in an environment-fitting manner.
Authors: Martha J Farah; David M Shera; Jessica H Savage; Laura Betancourt; Joan M Giannetta; Nancy L Brodsky; Elsa K Malmud; Hallam Hurt Journal: Brain Res Date: 2006-08-01 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Melissa L Sturge-Apple; Jennifer H Suor; Patrick T Davies; Dante Cicchetti; Michael A Skibo; Fred A Rogosch Journal: Psychol Sci Date: 2016-04-26
Authors: Jesús de la Fuente; José Manuel Martínez-Vicente; Mónica Pachón-Basallo; Francisco Javier Peralta-Sánchez; Manuel Mariano Vera-Martínez; Magdalena P Andrés-Romero Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-06-22
Authors: Marta C Antonelli; Martin G Frasch; Mercedes Rumi; Ritika Sharma; Peter Zimmermann; Maria S Molinet; Silvia M Lobmaier Journal: Curr Neuropharmacol Date: 2022 Impact factor: 7.708
Authors: Marlen Z Gonzalez; Kelly L Wroblewski; Joseph P Allen; James A Coan; Jessica J Connelly Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 3.038