Literature DB >> 28325514

Multiparametric approach with diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a comparison study for differentiating between benign and malignant bone lesions in adults.

E Oh1, Y C Yoon2, J H Kim3, K Kim4.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of quantitative parameters derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in differentiating benign and malignant bone tumours.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients (age range, 21-82 years; mean age, 55 years) underwent pretreatment MRI. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated by DWI. The DCE-MRI data were analysed for the volume transfer constant (Ktrans), extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve), and volume rate constant (Kep), and Ktrans/ADC ratio. Each parameter's performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curv (AUC), and their AUCs were compared. ROC curves were analysed and each parameter's optimal cut-off value was determined, from which each parameter was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval for detecting malignant bone lesions after adjusting the age factor of each parameter was estimated.
RESULTS: All parameter values (except Ve) were significantly different between benign and malignant bone tumours (p<0.05). The Ktrans had a significantly greater AUC than Ve (p=0.03). The Ktrans/ADC and Kep had the best sensitivity (0.917) and specificity (0.632), respectively. The Kep and Ktrans/ADC had the best positive (0.811) and negative (0.769) predictive values, respectively. The OR was highest for Ktrans/ADC (17.38; p=0.0013).
CONCLUSION: The Ktrans, Kep, ADC, and Ktrans/ADC could help to detect malignant lesions from bone tumours and Ktrans/ADC appears to be the superior variable among them.
Copyright © 2017 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28325514     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

Review 1.  Advances in whole body MRI for musculoskeletal imaging: Diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Koeun Lee; Ho Young Park; Kyung Won Kim; Amy Junghyun Lee; Min A Yoon; Eun Jin Chae; Jeong Hyun Lee; Hye Won Chung
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-05-29

2.  Multiparametric evaluation of bone tumors utilising diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Garima Sharma; Sonal Saran; Sudhir Saxena; Tarun Goyal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging for discriminating soft tissue sarcoma from vascular anomalies.

Authors:  Gang Wu; Xuanlin Liu; Yan Xiong; Jun Ran; Xiaoming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC): A potential in vivo biological surrogate of the incidentally discovered bone lesions at 3T MRI.

Authors:  M R Nouh; Ahmed Doweidar; Abdullah Mohie-Eddin Khalil
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2021-11-25

5.  The role of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Hannah C Chen; Marc F Wuerdeman; James H Chang; Neris M Nieves-Robbins
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2018-01-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.