| Literature DB >> 28324887 |
Yae-Eun Suh1, Katherine Lawler2,3, Rhonda Henley-Smith4, Lucy Pike5, Russell Leek6, Sally Barrington5, Edward W Odell4, Tony Ng3,7,8, Francesco Pezzella6, Teresa Guerrero-Urbano9, Mahvash Tavassoli1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypoxia imaging is a promising tool for targeted therapy but the links between imaging features and underlying molecular characteristics of the tumour have not been investigated. The aim of this study was to compare hypoxia biomarkers and gene expression in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) diagnostic biopsies with hypoxia imaged with 64Cu-ATSM PET/CT.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28324887 PMCID: PMC5396120 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.66
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Patient baseline characteristics and uptake values
| 1 | Female | 51 | 2 | 2b | Negative | 2.57 | 2.64 | 9.78 | 1.96 | 21 |
| 4 | Male | 60 | 3 | 0 | Positive | 3.61 | 6.07 | 29.58 | 2.45 | 18 |
| 8 | Male | 71 | 4 | 2b | Negative | 3.96 | 9.00 | 5.60 | 2.46 | 38 |
| 9 | Male | 54 | 2 | 2b | Positive | 2.67 | 3.63 | 35 | ||
| 10 | Male | 46 | 4 | 0 | Positive | 3.14 | 3.74 | 6.31 | 2.02 | 34 |
| 11 | Female | 61 | 2 | 2a | Positive | 2.99 | 3.23 | 18 | ||
| 12 | Male | 64 | 2 | 2b | Positive | 4.35 | 5.61 | 10.76 | 3.11 | 41 |
| 13 | Male | 59 | 3 | 1 | Positive | 3.83 | 5.36 | 36.89 | 2.61 | 22 |
| 14 | Male | 47 | 3 | 2b | Positive | 3.34 | 5.91 | 7.55 | 2.27 | 24 |
| 15 | Male | 44 | 2 | 2c | Negative | 4.85 | 4.71 | 21.66 | 2.94 | 45 |
| 16 | Male | 66 | 3 | 2b | Negative | 3.75 | 5.00 | 23.01 | 2.58 | 13 |
| 17 | Male | 56 | 2 | 2a | Positive | 2.34 | 2.91 | 2.15 | 1.90 | 22 |
| 18 | Male | 69 | 1 | 2b | Negative | 2.12 | 2.83 | 0.68 | 1.71 | 30 |
| 19 | Male | 64 | 2 | 1 | Positive | 4.21 | 5.10 | 7.51 | 2.68 | 18 |
| 20 | Female | 60 | 1 | 2b | Positive | 2.13 | 1.84 | 1.49 | 1.77 | 25 |
Abbreviations: HPV, human papilloma virus; SUV, standardised uptake values; TMR, tumour to mucle ratio. TMR is the ratio of SUVmax to average SUVmean of bilateral posterior neck muscle.
Hypoxic volume and SUVmean are excluded for tonsillectomy patients (Study IDs 9 and 11).
Figure 1(A–B) Example images of 64Cu-ATSM PET (left) and fused PET/CT (right) scans. (A) Patient with T2N2b left base of tongue SCC, with Cu-ATSM uptake in the primary but no uptake in left level II neck node. (B) Patient with T3N1 left tonsil SCC with high uptake in primary. (C) Immunohistochemistry staining of hypoxia biomarker CA9 vs each image feature. ‘High' is defined as values greater than the median value. (D) Scatterplots of 64Cu-ATSM imaging parameters vs the previously reported Sorensen2015 hypoxia classifier. Hypoxic volume, TMR and SUVmax plotted against the 15-gene hypoxia classifier. A significant positive correlation is observed between the hypoxia score and hypoxic volume but not TMR or SUVmax. Red points indicate samples with low hypoxia score but high SUVmax. Samples from patients who had diagnostic tonsillectomies (Study IDs 9 and 11) were excluded as a hypoxic volume could not be determined.
Figure 2HVS associated with hypoxic volume.(A) The heatmap displays the HVS, comprising 16 genes positively and 5 genes negatively associated with hypoxic volume. Samples are ordered by increasing hypoxic volume (base mean >200; adjusted P<0.05 or (italicised) adjusted P<0.1). Two genes that overlapped with the 15-gene hypoxia classifier gene list are LOX and PFKFB3. Yellow and blue colour bar shows the hypoxia 15-gene classifier score by rank within samples, for comparison (Sorensen2015). (B) CA9 IHC is shown compared with ‘low' or ‘high' HVS signature scores for all samples (n=15). ‘High' is defined as HVS scores greater than the median of HVS scores.