| Literature DB >> 28324546 |
Asha Dhasayan1, Joseph Selvin2, Seghal Kiran3.
Abstract
Marine-derived biosurfactants have gained significant attention due to their structural and functional diversity. Biosurfactant production was performed using bacteria associated with Callyspongia diffusa, a marine sponge inhabiting the southern coast of India. A total of 101 sponge-associated bacteria were isolated on different media, of which 29 isolates showed positive result for biosurfactant production. Among the 29 positive isolates, four were selected based on highest emusification activity and were identified based on 16S rDNA sequence analysis. These isolates were identified as Bacillus subtilis MB-7, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MB-101, Halomonas sp. MB-30 and Alcaligenes sp. MB-I9. The 16S rDNA nucleotide sequences were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers KF493730, KJ540939, KJ414418 and KJ540940, respectively. Based on the highest oil displacement activity and effective surface tension reduction potential, the isolate B. amyloliquefaciens MB-101 was selected for further optimization and structural delineation. The production of biosurfactant by the isolate was significantly enhanced up to 6.76 g/l with optimal concentration values of 2.83 % for glycerol, 2.65 % for peptone, 20.11 mM for ferrous sulfate and 74 h of incubation by employing factorial design. The structural features of the purified biosurfactant from B. amyloliquefaciens MB-101 showed similarity with lipopeptide class of biosurfactant. In conclusion, the present study emphasizes the utilization of marine sponge-associated bacteria for the production of biosurfactant that may find various applications.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Biosurfactant; Callyspongia diffusa; Lipopeptide; Marine sponge; Sponge-associated bacteria
Year: 2014 PMID: 28324546 PMCID: PMC4522725 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-014-0242-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Biosurfactant screening of selected four bacteria isolated from marine sponge C. diffusa
| S. No | Screening test | MB-101 | MB-7 | MB-30 | MB-I9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Lipase activity (cm) | 1.3 ± 0.04 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.05 | 0.8 ± 0.2 |
| 2. | Hemolytic activity | + | + | + | − |
| 3. | Blue agar method | − | − | + | + |
| 4. | Oil displacement (mm) | 11 ± 0.2 | 9 ± 0.3 | 10 ± 0.2 | 10 ± 0.1 |
| 5. | Drop collapsing test | + | + | + | + |
| 6. | Glass tilted method | + | + | + | + |
| 7. | Surface tension (mN/m) | 28 ± 0.6 | 28.8 ± 0.5 | 29 ± 0.45 | 29 ± 0.23 |
| 8. | Hydrophobicity (%) in stationary phase culture | 63.2 ± 0.34 | 65.9 ± 0.72 | 79.2 ± 0.54 | 78.4 ± 0.37 |
+ Positive, − Negative
Fig. 1Emulsification activity of sponge isolated bacteria with different incubation time (h). The error bars denote SD values of three independent experiments
Biochemical identification of biosurfactant producing bacterial isolates from marine sponge
| Test | MB-101 | MB-7 | MB-30 | MB-I9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram staining | + | + | − | − |
| Motility | + | + | + | + |
| Cell shape | Rods | Rods | Small rods | Small rods |
| Indole | + | − | − | − |
| Methyl red | − | + | + | + |
| VP | − | + | + | + |
| Citrate | + | + | + | + |
| Oxidase | + | + | − | + |
| Catalase | + | + | + | + |
| Hydrolytic activity | ||||
| Starch | + | + | + | − |
| Casein | + | + | − | − |
| Tributyrin | + | + | + | + |
| Urea | − | − | + | − |
| Fermentation test | ||||
| Glucose | + | + | + | − |
|
| − | − | − | W |
| Mannitol | W | + | + | − |
| Sucrose | + | + | + | − |
+ Positive, − Negative, W weakly positive
Fig. 2Evolutionary relationship of sponge isolated bacteria with other related species. Numbers at nodes indicate levels of bootstrap support (%) based on a neighbor-joining analysis of 1,000 re-sampled datasets
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the central composite design optimization for the production of biosurfactant by MB-101
| Source | Sum of squares |
| Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 21.32 | 14 | 1.52 | 67.58 | <0.0001** |
| A-glycerol | 2.86 | 1 | 2.86 | 127.10 | <0.0001** |
| B-peptone | 1.11 | 1 | 1.11 | 49.43 | <0.0001** |
| C-ferrous sulfate | 0.033 | 1 | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.2449 |
| D-incubation time | 0.64 | 1 | 0.64 | 28.27 | <0.0001** |
|
| 0.014 | 1 | 0.014 | 0.61 | 0.4459 |
|
| 0.032 | 1 | 0.032 | 1.40 | 0.2554 |
|
| 0.22 | 1 | 0.22 | 9.91 | 0.0066* |
|
| 0.31 | 1 | 0.31 | 13.80 | 0.0021* |
|
| 0.44 | 1 | 0.44 | 19.48 | 0.0005** |
|
| 0.28 | 1 | 0.28 | 12.35 | 0.0031* |
|
| 11.39 | 1 | 11.39 | 505.67 | <0.0001** |
|
| 4.80 | 1 | 4.80 | 212.95 | <0.0001** |
|
| 1.51 | 1 | 1.51 | 66.94 | <0.0001** |
|
| 2.48 | 1 | 2.48 | 110.10 | <0.0001** |
| Residual | 0.34 | 15 | 0.023 | ||
| Lack of fit | 0.34 | 10 | 0.034 |
R-Squared −0.9844; Adj R-squared 0.9698
** More significant, * significant
Fig. 3a Contour plot of interactive effect of glycerol: peptone, b glycerol: ferrous sulphate, c 3D response surface graph of interactive effect of glycerol: incubation time and d peptone: incubation time on lipopeptide biosurfactant production by B. amyloliquefaciens MB-101, while other two factors were held at fixed levels
Fig. 4a TLC and b HPLC profile of biosurfactant extracted from B. amyloliquefaciens MB-101
Fig. 5a FTIR absorption spectra of biosurfactant produced by B. amyloliquefaciens MB-101 and b 1H NMR spectrum of MB-101 biosurfactant (CDCl3 at 25 °C)