| Literature DB >> 28324482 |
Pallavi Singh1, Padmanabh Dwivedi2.
Abstract
Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, member of Asteraceae family, has bio-active compounds stevioside and rebaudioside which taste about 300 times sweeter than sucrose. It regulates blood sugar, prevents hypertension and tooth decay as well as used in treatment of skin disorders having high medicinal values, and hence there is a need for generating the plant on large scale. We have developed an efficient micropropagation protocol on half strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) media, using two-stage culture procedures. Varying concentrations of cytokinins, i.e., benzylaminopurine, kinetin and thidiazuron (TDZ) were supplemented in the nutrient media to observe their effects on shoot development. All the cytokinins promoted shoot formation, however, best response was observed in the TDZ (0.5 mg/l). The shoots from selected induction medium were sub-cultured on the multiplication media. The media containing 0.01 mg/l TDZ produced maximum number of shoot (11.00 ± 0.40) with longer shoots (7.17 ± 0.16) and highest number of leaves (61.00 ± 1.29). Rooting response was best observed in one-fourth strength on MS media supplemented with indole-3-butyric acid (1.0 mg/l) and activated charcoal (50 mg/l) with (11.00 ± 0.40) number of roots. The plantlets thus obtained were hardened and transferred to the pots with soil and sand mixture, where the survival rate was 80 % after 2 months. Quantitative analysis of stevioside content in leaves of in vivo mother plant and in vitro plantlets was carried out by high performance liquid chromatography. A remarkable increase in stevioside content was noticed in the in vitro-raised plants as compared to in vivo grown plants. The protocol reported here might be useful in genetic improvement and high stevioside production.Entities:
Keywords: Micropropagation; Murashige and Skoog medium; Stevia rebaudiana; Stevioside; Thidiazuron
Year: 2013 PMID: 28324482 PMCID: PMC4145626 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-013-0172-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Effect of various cytokinins on in vitro shoot induction in Stevia rebaudiana
| Plant growth regulator (mg/l) | Number of shoots | Shoot length (cm) | Number of leaves | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | Kinetin | TDZ | ||||
| A | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.50 ± 0.28a | 1.75 ± 0.14bcd | 14.50 ± 1.50bc |
| B | 0.2 | – | – | 2.25 ± 0.25a | 1.20 ± 0.27abc | 15.75 ± 1.84bc |
| C | 0.5 | – | – | 1.75 ± 0.25a | 0.80 ± 0.08ab | 15.25 ± 1.79bc |
| D | 1.0 | – | – | 2.00 ± 0.00a | 0.45 ± 0.09a | 12.00 ± 1.63ab |
| E | – | 0.2 | – | 2.00 ± 0.00a | 1.95 ± 0.35cde | 12.25 ± 0.25ab |
| F | – | 0.5 | – | 1.50 ± 0.28a | 1.00 ± 0.08ab | 20.00 ± 0.81de |
| G | – | 1.0 | – | 1.75 ± 0.25a | 1.15 ± 0.05abc | 17.50 ± 0.50cd |
| H | 0.2 | 0.2 | – | 2.00 ± 0.00a | 3.10 ± 0.96f | 11.50 ± 0.50ab |
| I | 0.5 | 0.5 | – | 2.25 ± 0.25a | 0.82 ± 0.19ab | 9.50 ± 0.95a |
| J | 1.0 | 1.0 | – | 1.75 ± 0.25a | 0.95 ± 0.12ab | 8.00 ± 1.63a |
| K | – | – | 0.01 | 2.00 ± 0.00a | 2.82 ± 0.11ef | 22.75 ± 0.94ef |
| L | – | – | 0.03 | 2.00 ± 0.00a | 2.60 ± 0.21def | 23.50 ± 1.25ef |
| M | – | – | 0.05 | 2.00 ± 0.00a | 2.77 ± 0.13ef | 24.25 ± 0.47f |
| N | – | – | 0.1 | 2.00 ± 0.00a | 2.65 ± 0.12def | 24.75 ± 0.94fg |
| O | – | – | 0.2 | 2.00 ± 0.00a | 2.30 ± 0.13def | 28.50 ± 1.25g |
| P | – | – | 0.5 | 3.00 ± 0.57b | 2.20 ± 0.11def | 33.00 ± 2.88h |
Parameters have been recorded after 3 weeks of culture. Data are in the form of mean ± SEM, and means followed by the same letter within the columns are not significantly different (P = 0.05) using Duncan’s multiple range test
Effect of cytokinins on shoot multiplication of Stevia rebaudiana
| Induction medium | Multiplication medium | Number of shoots | Shoot length (cm) | Number of leaves |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP (0.2 mg/l) | B | 5.75 ± 0.25bc | 4.32 ± 0.48a | 46.25 ± 0.62cd |
| ½ MS | 3.25 ± 0.62a | 4.20 ± 0.16a | 37.50 ± 1.70b | |
| ½ MS + TDZ (0.01) | 9.25 ± 0.25d | 6.67 ± 0.26d | 50.50 ± 0.95ef | |
| Kn (0.2 mg/l) | E | 4.75 ± 0.25b | 5.05 ± 0.09b | 44.75 ± 0.48c |
| ½ MS | 2.50 ± 0.28a | 4.82 ± 0.16ab | 30.50 ± 0.95a | |
| ½ MS + TDZ (0.01) | 8.50 ± 0.28d | 6.95 ± 0.95d | 50.00 ± 0.81ef | |
| BAP and Kn (0.2 mg/l each) | H | 5.25 ± 0.25bc | 5.20 ± 0.14b | 40.75 ± 0.75b |
| ½ MS | 3.00 ± 0.40a | 5.90 ± 0.12c | 30.50 ± 1.70a | |
| ½ MS + TDZ (0.01) | 8.75 ± 0.25d | 8.05 ± 0.22e | 49.00 ± 1.29de | |
| TDZ (0.5 mg/l) | P | 6.00 ± 0.40c | 4.85 ± 0.12ab | 52.50 ± 1.25f |
| ½ MS | 4.75 ± 0.25b | 5.02 ± 0.16b | 40.00 ± 0.81b | |
| ½ MS + TDZ (0.01) | 11.00 ± 0.40e | 7.17 ± 0.16d | 61.00 ± 1.29g |
Parameters have been recorded after 4 weeks of transfer in multiplication media. Data are in the form of mean ± SEM, and means followed by the same letter within the columns are not significantly different (P = 0.05) using Duncan’s multiple range test
Effect of MS salt concentration and IBA on in vitro root induction
| Rooting media | IBA (mg/l) | Number of roots | Root length (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ½ MS media | 0.2 | 1.75 ± 0.25a | 1.85 ± 0.09a |
| 0.5 | 3.25 ± 0.25b | 1.87 ± 0.11a | |
| 1.0 | 6.00 ± 0.40c | 2.20 ± 0.18a | |
| ¼ MS media | 0.2 | 2.75 ± 0.25ab | 2.12 ± 0.11a |
| 0.5 | 6.25 ± 0.85c | 2.80 ± 0.18b | |
| 1.0 | 11.00 ± 0.40d | 4.62 ± 0.19c |
Parameters have been recorded after 4 weeks of transfer in rooting media. Data are in the form of mean ± SEM, and means followed by the same letter within the columns are not significantly different (P = 0.05) using Duncan’s multiple range test
Fig. 1In vitro shoot multiplication and rooting of Stevia rebaudiana.a Shoot formation in ½ MS supplemented with 0.01 mg/l TDZ. b Cultures in induction media TDZ (0.5 mg/l) transferred to ½ MS multiplication media without hormone. c Cultures in induction media TDZ (0.5 mg/l) transferred to ½ MS multiplication media supplemented with TDZ (0.01 mg/l). d In vitro rooting in ¼ MS supplemented with IBA. e Hardened plants in perlite. f In vitro-raised Stevia rebaudiana in garden soil and sand mixture
Stevioside content in in vivo and in vitro leaf samples
| S. no. | Samples | Medium | Retention time (mm:ss) | Peak area (mAs) | Stevioside content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Standard | – | 2:22 | 596.1 | – |
| 2 | In vivo plants | – | 2:21 | 8,421.6 | 7.017 ± 0.058 |
| 3 | In vitro plants (3-week-old) | Half strength MS | 2:24 | 11,040.7 | 9.236 ± 0.046 |
| 4 | In vitro-raised plants (8-week-old) | Half strength MS | 2:24 | 11,040.7 | 9.236 ± 0.046 |
Two replicates of each sample were used for HPLC analysis (mean value calculated)