| Literature DB >> 28324478 |
S Swetha1, Ajit Varma2, T Padmavathi3.
Abstract
Piriformospora indica, a member of basidiomycota is an axenically cultivable endophytic fungus which exerts plant growth promoting effects on its host plant. P. indica is known to produce α-amylase and protease. Since the organism exhibits beneficial role in plant growth promotion, achieving high biomass is immensely essential. Hence to enable the commercial production, screening of medium components is a necessary step. The present paper investigates the screening of medium components using Plackett-Burman experimental design wherein the parameters such as α-amylase, protease and biomass have been examined. The parameters α-amylase, protease and biomass was found to vary from 0.25 to 0.45 mg-1 ml-1 min-1, 0.1 to 0.15 mg-1 ml-1 h-1 and 0.8 to 22.6 g l-1, respectively, in 16 runs which demonstrates the strong influence of the medium components.Entities:
Keywords: Piriformospora indica; Plackett–Burman experimental design; Protease; Submerged fermentation; α-Amylase
Year: 2013 PMID: 28324478 PMCID: PMC4145629 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-013-0168-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Plackett–Burman experimental design for the evaluation of 12 variables for α-amylase, protease and biomass
| Run | Soluble starch | Maltose | Sucrose | Glycerol | Carboxy methyl cellulose | Sodium nitrate | Ammonium chloride | Malt extract | Peptone | Yeast extract | TE solution | 20× salt solution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | + | + | − | + | − | + | + | − | + | − | + | + |
| 2 | + | + | + | − | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | − |
| 3 | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | − | + | + | − | − |
| 4 | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | − |
| 5 | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | + | + |
| 6 | + | + | + | − | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | + |
| 7 | − | + | − | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | + |
| 8 | + | − | − | + | + | + | − | + | − | + | − | + |
| 9 | + | − | − | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | − |
| 10 | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | + |
| 11 | − | − | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | + | − |
| 12 | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | + | + |
| 13 | − | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | + |
| 14 | − | + | − | − | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| 15 | − | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | + | − | − |
| 16 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
+ higher level (0.1 g), − lower level (0.05 g)
Fig. 1Pareto plots depicting the main effect of the variables on a α-amylase activity, b protease activity and c biomass
Regression coefficient results from the data of central composite designed experiments for α-amylase activity and protease activity
| Sl. no. | Components | α-Amylase activity | Protease activity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Constant | 4.1280 | 0.0258 | 8.3769 | 0.0036 |
| 2 | Soluble starch | 4.9329 | 0.0160 | −1.6904 | 0.1895 |
| 3 | Sodium nitrate | −1.7097 | 0.1859 | −3.4698 | 0.0404 |
| 4 | Maltose | 1.8143 | 0.1673 | 4.0036 | 0.0279 |
| 5 | Ammonium chloride | −4.1014 | 0.0262 | −3.2919 | 0.0460 |
| 6 | Malt extract | −1.8143 | 0.1673 | 2.2242 | 0.1126 |
| 7 | Peptone | −0.7736 | 0.4956 | −2.2242 | 0.1126 |
| 8 | Sucrose | 0.6745 | 0.5483 | −0.9787 | 0.3999 |
| 9 | TE solution | 4.3088 | 0.0230 | 0.8007 | 0.4818 |
| 10 | Glycerol | 3.1596 | 0.0509 | 2.4022 | 0.0957 |
| 11 | Yeast extract | −0.2635 | 0.8093 | 1.3345 | 0.2743 |
| 12 | CMC | −0.1532 | 0.8880 | −0.9787 | 0.3999 |
| 13 | Salt solution | −2.2273 | 0.1123 | 2.7581 | 0.0703 |
p value <0.05 is significant
Fig. 23D response plots showing the effects of independent variables on α-amylase and protease activity