| Literature DB >> 28324459 |
Remya Krishnan1, V S Anil Kumar1, K Murugan2.
Abstract
Bryophytes are the second largest group in the plant kingdom, but studies conducted to better understand their chemical composition are limited and scattered. Axenically grown bryophytes expressed potential in biotechnological processes. The present study was designed to investigate the in vitro cell growth, culture parameters and their effect on flavonoid synthesis. Chlorophyll-containing callus cells of Marchantia linearis Lehm & Lindenb. is able to grow under low light in the presence of organic carbon source and retain the ability to produce flavonoids. Highest flavonoid production was achieved using 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid as growth hormone. Inoculum size, light intensity, organic carbon source and cations are the culture parameters affecting flavonoid productivity. Maximum flavonoid productivity is observed under low light intensity, with a photon flux density ca. 20 μmol/m2/s. Optimal inoculum size and glucose concentration for flavonoid production are 10-14 and 2-3 %, respectively. Cations like ferrous trigger flavonoid synthesis by increasing its intracellular concentrations. Flavonoid production in the cell culture is shown to be significantly growth related. Osmotic stress is ineffective in triggering flavonoid synthesis. Methyl jasmonate and 2-(2-fluoro-6-nitrobenzylsulfanyl) pyridine-4-carbothioamide elicitors showed positive effect on intracellular flavonoid content in cultured cells. Using the standard plot of quercetin (y = 0.0148x, R2 = 0.975), the flavonoid contents of in vitro samples were found ranging from 4.0 to 17.7 mg quercetin equivalent/g tissue. Flavonoids are fractionated by HPLC-PAD revealed the presence of quercetin (182.5 μg/g), luteolin (464.5 μg/g) and apigenin (297.5 μg/g). Further studies are warranted to analyze the therapeutic potentiality of the flavonoids in the liverwort.Entities:
Keywords: Cell suspension; Culture parameters; Flavonoids; Marchantia linearis
Year: 2013 PMID: 28324459 PMCID: PMC3909577 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-013-0123-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Fig. 1HPLC-PAD chromatogram of flavonoids of standards cospurged with M. linearis extract: (A) Q; (B) L; (C) A. Column: HIQ SIL C18V. Mobile phase: methanol–acetonitrile–acetic acid–phosphoric acid–water (200:100:10:10:200, v/v/v). Flow rate: 1 mL/min. Photodiode array detector at 254.5 nm for (A), 345 nm for (B) (dark straight line Standard, light straight lineM. linearis extract)
Effect of cell growth and flavonoid productivity in cell suspension culture
| Culturing time (days) | Biomass (g−1) | SCV (%) | Flavonoid (mg/L/day) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 1.2 ± 0.01 | 5 ± 0.1 | 2.0 ± 1.2 |
| 4 | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 6 ± 0.3 | 2.2 ± 1.7 |
| 6 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 10 ± 0.12 | 6.0 ± 1 |
| 8 | 11.2 ± 0.25 | 12 ± 0.22 | 7.85 ± 2 |
| 10 | 12.6 ± 0.4 | 13 ± 0.2 | 9.49 ± 2.4 |
| 12 | 12.6 ± 0.3 | 14 ± 0.12 | 9.76 ± 1.8 |
| 14 | 12.6 ± 0.1 | 15 ± 0.7 | 10.7 ± 1.4 |
| 16 | 12.8 ± 0.2 | 15 ± 0.7 | 11.2 ± 0.2 |
Data are the mean ± SD of three independent measurements
Significant at P < 0.01. F-ratio = 0.82**, CD(0.05) = 1.429
Fig. 2Culture of M. linearis—a callus, b cell suspension, and c cells enlarged
Effect of carbon source on productivity of biomass and flavonoid content
| Carbon source (2 % W/V) | Productivity (mg/L/day) | |
|---|---|---|
| Biomass (g−1) | Flavonoid | |
| Galactose | 598.4 ± 0.89 | 8.4 ± 0.1 |
| Fructose | 610.6 ± 1.2 | 9.5 ± 0.7 |
| Glucose | 864 ± 6.8 | 12.4 ± 1 |
| Glucose/cinnamatea | – | – |
| Phenylalanine | 386.4 ± 2.7 | 4.9 ± 0.2 |
| Lactose | 20.5 ± 0.01 | 0.78 ± 0.01 |
| Maltose | 330 ± 5.2 | 1.8 ± 0.4 |
| Mannitol | 10.6 ± 0.02 | 0.5 ± 0.01 |
| Glucose/coumaratea | – | – |
| Sucrose | 700.2 ± 6.9 | 7.3 ± 0.5 |
Data are the mean ± SD of three independent measurements
Significant at P < 0.01. F-ratio = 3.569**, CD(0.05) = 2.76
aCells are found dead on 3rd day
Effect of glucose concentration on productivity of biomass and flavonoid content
| Glucose concentration (% W/V) | Productivity (mg/L/day) | |
|---|---|---|
| Biomass (g−1) | Flavonoid | |
| 0 | 60.4 ± 1.9 | 0.8 ± 0.01 |
| 1 | 798 ± 10.2 | 6.7 ± 0.5 |
| 2 | 1080 ± 8.9 | 9.4 ± 0.3 |
| 3 | 1260 ± 7.8 | 11.9 ± 1.2 |
| 4 | 1092 ± 6.5 | 8.2 ± 0.1 |
| 5 | 918.5 ± 1.7 | 5.3 ± 0.1 |
Data are the mean ± SD of three independent measurements
Significant at P < 0.01. F-ratio = 11.54**, CD(0.05) = 2.433
Effect of growth regulators on productivity of biomass and flavonoid content
| Growth regulator | Productivity (mg/L/day) | |
|---|---|---|
| Biomass (g−1) | Flavonoid | |
| Control | 614.5 ± 3.9 | 2.4 ± 0.2 |
| BAP (1 mg/L) | 362.8 ± 2.4 | 3.6 ± 0.3 |
| Kin (0.5 mg/L) | 510.4 ± 0.9 | 5 ± 0.2 |
| 2,4-D (0.5 mg/L) | 1036.5 ± 1.7 | 12.8 ± 0.3 |
| 2,4-D (0.5 mg/L) + BAP (1 mg/L) | 1100 ± 3.5 | 10.5 ± 0.2 |
| 2,4-D (0.5 mg/L) + Kin (0.5 mg/L) | 498 ± 0.1 | 4 ± 0.3 |
| NAA (0.5 mg/L) | 684 ± 9.2 | 5.7 ± 1 |
| NAA (0.5 mg/L) + BAP (1 mg/L) | 1200.5 ± 1.4 | 6.7 ± 0.32 |
| NAA (0.5 mg/L) + Kin (0.5 mg/L) | 1090 ± 7.3 | 8.3 ± 0.6 |
Data are the mean ± SD of three independent measurements
Significant at P < 0.01. F-ratio = 0.597**, CD(0.05) = 3.554
Effect of photodensity on productivity of biomass and flavonoid content
| Productivity (mg/L/day) | Photon flux density (μmol/m2/s) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 9 | 20 | 32 | |
| Biomass | 1010 ± 1.4 | 960 ± 7.4 | 951 ± 1.7 | 950 ± 2.8 |
| Flavonoid | 7.5 ± 0.2 | 9.8 ± 0.5 | 12 ± 0.2 | 10.4 ± 0.9 |
Data are the mean ± SD of three independent measurements
Significant at P < 0.01. F-ratio = 10.88**, CD(0.05) = 4.845
Effect of inoculums size on productivity of biomass and flavonoid content
| Inoculums (%) | Productivity (mg/L/day) | |
|---|---|---|
| Biomass (g−1) | Flavonoid | |
| 2 | 440 ± 4.3 | 4 ± 0.5 |
| 4 | 816 ± 7.2 | 5.2 ± 0.4 |
| 8 | 922 ± 1.3 | 7.3 ± 0.4 |
| 6 | 1100 ± 2.4 | 9.5 ± 0.4 |
| 8 | 1117 ± 2.4 | 10 ± 0.4 |
| 10 | 1142 ± 1.3 | 10.9 ± 0.3 |
| 12 | 1176 ± 2.1 | 12.8 ± 0.4 |
| 14 | 1182 ± 1.2 | 12.0 ± 0.9 |
Data are the mean ± SD of three independent measurements
Significant at P < 0.01. F-ratio = 5.16**, CD(0.05) = 11.05
Effect of cations on productivity of biomass and flavonoid content
| Cations (30 % increase) | Productivity (mg/L/day) | |
|---|---|---|
| Biomass (g−1) | Flavonoid | |
| Control | 1160 ± 3.1 | 2.6 ± 0.2 |
| Mg2+ | 1147 ± 2.3 | 5.8 ± 0.2 |
| Mn2+ | 1032 ± 1.4 | 7.4 ± 0.4 |
| Cu2+ | 1155 ± 1.6 | 8 ± 0.5 |
| Fe2+ | 1200 ± 1.3 | 12 ± 1.2 |
| Ca2+ | 1156 ± 0.4 | 9 ± 0.42 |
Data are the mean ± SD of three independent measurements
Significant at P < 0.01. F-ratio = 5.89**, CD(0.05) = 2.417
Effect of osmolarity on productivity of biomass and flavonoid content
| Osmolarity | Productivity (mg/L/day) | |
|---|---|---|
| Biomass (g−1) | Flavonoid | |
| NaCl (%) | ||
| 0 | 560 ± 1.4 | 4.5 ± 0.2 |
| 0.1 | 647 ± 1.5 | 7.8 ± 0.3 |
| 0.2 | 422 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.01 |
| 0.5 | 200 ± 0.21 | 1.5 ± 0.05 |
| Sucrose (%) | ||
| 0 | 1060 ± 1.2 | 3.8 ± 0.9 |
| 2 | 800 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.4 |
| 4 | 510 ± 1.2 | 5.3 ± 0.1 |
| 6 | 260 ± 0.5 | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
Data are the mean ± SD of three independent measurements
Significant at P < 0. 01. F-ratio = 12.07**, CD(0.05) = 22.65
Effect of methyl jasmonate and 2-(2-fluoro-6-nitrobenzylsulfanyl) pyridine-4-carbothioamide on productivity of biomass and flavonoid content
| Elicitors | Productivity (mg/L/day) | |
|---|---|---|
| Biomass (g−1) | Flavonoid | |
| Methyl jasmonate | ||
| Control | 1012 ± 0.2 | 6.7 ± 0.44 |
| 100 μM | 1240 ± 0.6 | 13.5 ± 0.27 |
| 200 μM | 1308 ± 0.2 | 16.4 ± 0.08 |
| 2-(2-fluoro-6-nitrobenzylsulfanyl) pyridine-4-carbothioamide | ||
| 0 | 1011 ± 0.4 | 5.8 ± 0.6 |
| 1 μmol/L | 1297 ± 0.6 | 15.4 ± 0.3 |
| 10 μmol/L | 1370 ± 0.8 | 17.7 ± 0.2 |
Data are the mean ± SD of three independent measurements
Significant at P < 0.01. F-ratio = 0.458**, CD(0.05) = 13.09
Fig. 3Comparison of DO value in cell suspension culture of M. linearis under illumination or in dark. Photon of intensity was 610 μmol/m/s. Cells are tested in a vessel of i.d. 2.6 cm