| Literature DB >> 28324456 |
Nidhi Pareek1,2, Sanjoy Ghosh3, R P Singh4, V Vivekanand4,5.
Abstract
Optimization of the fermentation conditions for chitin deacetylase (CDA) production by Penicillium oxalicum SAEM-51 was undertaken in the present study using central composite design (CCD) under submerged condition. CDA is widely employed for bio-catalytic conversion of chitin to chitosan. Chitosan is a biopolymer with immense commercial potential in diverse industrial sectors, viz. pharmaceutics, food, agriculture, water treatment, etc. CDA production was significantly affected by all the variables studied, viz. pH, temperature, inoculum age and size. The optimal conditions that stimulating maximal CDA production were found to be: pH, 7.9; temperature, 28 °C; inoculum age, 90 h, and 11 % inoculum size. Under these optimized conditions, the actual maximal CDA production was 623.57 ± 8.2 Ul-1, which was in good agreement with the values predicted by the quadratic model (648.24 Ul-1), confirming the validity of the model. Optimization of fermentation conditions through CCD had resulted into 1.4-fold enhancement in CDA productivity (Qp = 4.3264 Ul-1 h-1). Results of these experiments indicated that response surface methodology was proved to be a promising method for optimization of CDA production.Entities:
Keywords: Central composite design; Chitin deacetylase; Chitosan; Fermentation conditions; Penicillium oxalicum
Year: 2013 PMID: 28324456 PMCID: PMC3909569 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-013-0118-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Concentration ranges of four independent variables used in central composite design
| Variable | Component | Range studied | Levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −α | −1 | 0 | +1 | +α | |||
|
| pH | 4.00–8.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 6.00 | 7.00 | 8.00 |
|
| Temperature (°C) | 20.00–40.00 | 20.00 | 25.00 | 30.00 | 35.00 | 40.00 |
|
| Inoculum age (h) | 72.00–196.00 | 72.00 | 96.00 | 120.00 | 144.00 | 168.00 |
|
| Inoculum size (%, v/v) | 1.00–13.00 | 1.00 | 4.00 | 7.00 | 10.00 | 13.00 |
α = 2, where k = 4 represents no. of variables
Experimental design matrix for optimization of chitin deacetylase production using central composite design
| Run | Independent variables (actual values) | CDA (Ul−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | Temperature (°C) | Inoculum age (h) | Inoculum size (%) | Observed | Predicted | |
| 1 | 5.0 | 25.0 | 96.0 | 4.0 | 527.85 ± 3.2 | 520.75 |
| 2 | 5.0 | 25.0 | 96.0 | 10.0 | 543.16 ± 4.1 | 545.17 |
| 3 | 5.0 | 25.0 | 144.0 | 4.0 | 475.32 ± 2.8 | 478.63 |
| 4 | 5.0 | 25.0 | 144.0 | 10.0 | 528.73 ± 2.5 | 523.42 |
| 5 | 5.0 | 35.0 | 96.0 | 4.0 | 559.26 ± 3.4 | 550.96 |
| 6 | 5.0 | 35.0 | 96.0 | 10.0 | 558.14 ± 2.1 | 552.75 |
| 7 | 5.0 | 35.0 | 144.0 | 4.0 | 490.25 ± 3.1 | 491.08 |
| 8 | 5.0 | 35.0 | 144.0 | 10.0 | 516.35 ± 2.7 | 513.13 |
| 9 | 7.0 | 25.0 | 96.0 | 4.0 | 539.03 ± 1.8 | 545.96 |
| 10 | 7.0 | 25.0 | 96.0 | 10.0 | 568.34 ± 2.3 | 568.75 |
| 11 | 7.0 | 25.0 | 144.0 | 4.0 | 513.23 ± 3.4 | 520.08 |
| 12 | 7.0 | 25.0 | 144.0 | 10.0 | 551.76 ± 2.9 | 563.13 |
| 13 | 7.0 | 35.0 | 96.0 | 4.0 | 581.28 ± 3.3 | 587.42 |
| 14 | 7.0 | 35.0 | 96.0 | 10.0 | 587.87 ± 4.1 | 587.46 |
| 15 | 7.0 | 35.0 | 144.0 | 4.0 | 542.84 ± 3.8 | 545.17 |
| 16 | 7.0 | 35.0 | 144.0 | 10.0 | 556.54 ± 3.4 | 564.08 |
| 17 | 8.0 | 30.0 | 120.0 | 7.0 | 629.74 ± 2.7 | 610.13 |
| 18 | 4.0 | 30.0 | 120.0 | 7.0 | 521.71 ± 2.5 | 533.96 |
| 19 | 6.0 | 40.0 | 120.0 | 7.0 | 540.65 ± 2.4 | 542.13 |
| 20 | 6.0 | 20.0 | 120.0 | 7.0 | 519.85 ± 3.2 | 510.96 |
| 21 | 6.0 | 30.0 | 168.0 | 7.0 | 472.16 ± 1.7 | 461.79 |
| 22 | 6.0 | 30.0 | 72.0 | 7.0 | 523.37 ± 2.4 | 527.29 |
| 23 | 6.0 | 30.0 | 120.0 | 13.0 | 596.39 ± 3.5 | 593.46 |
| 24 | 6.0 | 30.0 | 120.0 | 1.0 | 552.75 ± 2.6 | 548.63 |
| 25 | 6.0 | 30.0 | 120.0 | 7.0 | 546.24 ± 2.3 | 545.17 |
| 26 | 6.0 | 30.0 | 120.0 | 7.0 | 542.08 ± 3.1 | 545.17 |
| 27 | 6.0 | 30.0 | 120.0 | 7.0 | 543.61 ± 1.6 | 545.17 |
| 28 | 6.0 | 30.0 | 120.0 | 7.0 | 545.29 ± 3.5 | 545.17 |
| 29 | 6.0 | 30.0 | 120.0 | 7.0 | 547.66 ± 2.4 | 545.17 |
| 30 | 6.0 | 30.0 | 120.0 | 7.0 | 548.15 ± 2.6 | 545.17 |
ANOVA for quadratic model
| Source | SS | DF | MS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 29,794.55 | 14 | 2,128.18 | 24.61 | <0.0001 |
| Residual | 1,296.92 | 15 | 86.46 | – | – |
| Lack of fit | 1,270.08 | 10 | 127.01 | 23.67 | 0.0014 |
| Pure error | 26.83 | 5 | 5.37 | – | – |
| Total | 31,091.47 | 29 | – | – | – |
R: 0.9583; Adj R: 0.9194; C.V.: 1.72 %; Adeq. precision: 22.560
Model coefficient estimated by regression analyses
| Variables | ||
|---|---|---|
| Intercept | – | – |
|
| 100.65 | <0.0001 |
|
| 16.85 | 0.0009 |
|
| 74.43 | <0.0001 |
|
| 34.87 | <0.0001 |
|
| 14.32 | 0.0018 |
|
| 6.88 | 0.0192 |
|
| 50.82 | <0.0001 |
|
| 13.27 | 0.0024 |
|
| 1.46 | 0.2450 |
|
| 3.05 | 0.1010 |
|
| 0.035 | 0.8532 |
|
| 3.64 | 0.0756 |
|
| 5.99 | 0.0272 |
|
| 4.74 | 0.0458 |
Fig. 1Contour plot of CDA activity as a function of temperature and inoculum size
Fig. 2Contour plot of CDA activity as a function of inoculum age and inoculum size
Fig. 3Contour plot of CDA activity as a function of temperature and inoculum age
Fig. 4Profile of chitin deacetylase production by mutant Penicillium oxalicum SAEM-51 under submerged fermentation (circle basal conditions; triangle optimized conditions)