| Literature DB >> 28324426 |
Komal Gupta1, Shashank Garg2, Joginder Singh3, Manoj Kumar4.
Abstract
Cell culture in shake flask and air-lift bioreactor was carried out to exploit the potential of Arnebia sp. for napthoquinone metabolite production. Cell suspension cultures of Arnebia were established from friable callus in liquid MS medium supplemented with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) (10 μM) and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) (5 μM). Growth kinetic studies were done by using settled cell volume and fresh/dry cell weight method. Suspension cultures were maintained by sub-culturing at 10 days interval. A two-stage culture system is employed using growth medium (GM) and modified M9 medium (production medium) for cell biomass and naphthoquinone pigment production, respectively. Results showed that cultivation of cells under dark conditions at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) enhanced the cell biomass from 100 to 625 g l-1. The pigment production was also found to be increased in dark conditions at room temperature. Alkaline pH found to have positive effect on pigment yield. In case of M9 medium constituents, absence of Na2SO4 does not affect the pigment yield. The current approaches have the cumulative effect to meet an increased level of (25.5 μg/ml) metabolite production in air-lift bioreactor.Entities:
Keywords: Air-lift bioreactor; Plant cell culture; Secondary metabolites; Shikonin
Year: 2013 PMID: 28324426 PMCID: PMC4026457 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-013-0149-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Combinations of PGRs used for studying the effect of salts on callus induction of Arnebia
| PGR | 2,4-D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 μM | 2 μM | 5 μM | 10 μM | |
| Kn | ||||
| 0 μM | 0,0 (T1) | 0,2 (T2) | 0,5 (T3) | 0,10 (T4) |
| 2 μM | 2,0 (T5) | 2,2 (T6) | 2,5 (T7) | 2,10 (T8) |
| 5 μM | 5,0 (T9) | 5,2 (T10) | 5,5 (T11) | 5,10 (T12) |
| 10 μM | 10,0 (T13) | 10,2 (T14) | 10,5 (T15) | 10,10 (T16) |
Effect of light exposure duration on shikonin production
| Replicates | Shikonin (μg/ml) | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | |
| R1 = treatment under 2 days dark + 8 days light | 11.1 | 1.249 |
| R2 = treatment under 4 days dark + 6 days light | 10.75 | 1.671 |
| R3 = treatment under 6 days dark + 4 days light | 24.95 | 2.144 |
| R4 = treatment under 8 days dark + 2 days light | 12.95 | 2.308 |
| R5 = treatment under 10 days dark | 11.90 | 1.61 |
| R6 = treatment under 10 days light | 6.00 | 0.655 |
Effect of PGRs on callus induction
| Treatment | Response | Treatment | Response | Treatment | Response | Treatment | Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T17 | T33 | T49 | ||||
| T2 | * | T18 | T34 | T50 | |||
| T3 | T19 | T35 | T51 | ||||
| T4 | T20 | T36 | T52 | ||||
| T5 | * | T21 | T37 | T53 | |||
| T6 | ** | T22 | T38 | T54 | |||
| T7 | T23 | *** | T39 | T55 | ** | ||
| T8 | T24 | T40 | T56 | ||||
| T9 | ** | T25 | T41 | T57 | |||
| T10 | **** | T26 | T42 | ** | T58 | ||
| T11 | T27 | T43 | T59 | ||||
| T12 | T28 | T44 | T60 | ||||
| T13 | T29 | T45 | T61 | ||||
| T14 | **** | T30 | T46 | *** | T62 | ||
| T15 | **** | T31 | T47 | T63 | |||
| T16 | T32 | **** | T48 | T64 |
NIL columns represent no swelling of explants and induction up to 40 days of incubation
* Swelling in all the explants after 20 days but induction was observed only in one explant after 30 days
** Swelling in all the explants after 15 days but induction was observed only in explants after 20 days
*** Swelling in all the explants after 20 days but induction was observed only in one explant after 30 days
**** Swelling in all the explants after 20 days but induction was observed only in one explant after 30 days
Effect of initial pH of medium on shikonin production
| Sr. no. | Time interval (days) | Shikonin (μg/ml) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH 3.75 | pH 5.75 | pH 7.75 | pH 9.75 | ||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.096 | 0.525 | 0.082 | 0.525 | 0.035 | 0.5 | 0.072 |
| 2 | 2 | 0.75 | 0.075 | 1.25 | 0.121 | 1.05 | 0.095 | 1.275 | 0.197 |
| 3 | 4 | 1.025 | 0.109 | 2.25 | 0.252 | 1.825 | 0.175 | 2.6 | 0.319 |
| 4 | 6 | 2.375 | 0.218 | 5.025 | 0.229 | 3.05 | 0.353 | 7.05 | 0.321 |
| 5 | 8 | 3.2 | 0.229 | 5.8 | 0.409 | 4.675 | 0.303 | 9.3 | 1.029 |
| 6 | 10 | 5.9 | 0.377 | 7.75 | 0.804 | 7.5 | 0.750 | 9.85 | 0.721 |
| 7 | 12 | 6.15 | 0.242 | 8.375 | 0.533 | 8.8 | 0.393 | 10.025 | 0.801 |
Fig. 1Leaf explants of Arnebia sp. for callusing a swelling of leaves, b initiation of callus (T14), c proliferation of callus (T15), and d control
Fig. 2Growth curve based on settled cell volume (SCV)
Fig. 3Growth curve based on fresh and dry cell weight
Fig. 4Effect of dark and light conditions on biomass production
Fig. 5Standard curve of shikonin
Fig. 6Comparison of dark and light conditions on shikonin production
Fig. 7Effect of light exposure period on shikonin production
Fig. 8Effect of initial pH of medium on biomass growth
Fig. 9Effect of initial pH of medium on shikonin production
Production of shikonin under dark and light conditions
| Sr. no. | Time interval (days) | Shikonin (μg/ml) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dark condition | Light condition | ||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.132 | 0.5 | 0.055 |
| 3 | 2 | 1.2 | 0.264 | 1.2 | 0.132 |
| 3 | 4 | 1.35 | 0.229 | 1.25 | 0.079 |
| 4 | 6 | 2.45 | 0.132 | 1.45 | 0.11 |
| 5 | 8 | 3.1 | 0.360 | 1.49 | 0.127 |
| 6 | 10 | 10.2 | 0.781 | 1.55 | 0.125 |
| 7 | 12 | 10.9 | 1.044 | 7.7 | 0.529 |
Fig. 10Effect of salts on production of shikonin
Production of shikonin in three different culture systems
| Sr. no. | Culture system | Concentration of shikonin produced (μg/ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | ||
| 1 | Shake-flask (2 L) | 9.7 | 3.522 |
| 2 | Stirred-tank bioreactor (2 L) | 21.15 | 3.050 |
| 3 | Air-lift bioreactor (2 L) | 25.5 | 5.286 |
Fig. 11Comparative histogram for produce of shikonin in 3 different culture systems
Combination of salts used for studying effect on pigment production
| Sr. no. | No. of combinations | Shikonin concentration (μg/ml) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | ||
| T1 | All salts [control] | 19.5 | 2.438 |
| T2 | All salts + KH2PO4–NaH2PO4 | 8.55 | 1.931 |
| T3 | All salts: MgSO4·7H2O | 8.25 | 1.920 |
| T4 | All salts: KNO3 | 20.5 | 2.825 |
| T5 | All salts: Ca(NO3)2·4H2O | 6.4 | 1.264 |
| T6 | All salts: KCl | 9.8 | 1.739 |
| T7 | All salts: Na2SO4 | 24.25 | 2.818 |
| T8 | All salts: KNO3 | 9.55 | 3.308 |
| T9 | All salts: NaH2PO4 | 8.4 | 1.757 |
One-way ANOVA of effect of salts combination as per Table 7
| *** | |||
| Are means significant different? ( | Yes | ||
| Number of groups | 9 | ||
|
| 24.91 | ||
| 0.9172 | |||
| ANOVA table | SS | ||
| Treatment (between columns) | 1,062 | df | MS |
| Residual (within columns) | 95.9 | 8 | 132.7 |
| Total | 1,158 | 18 | 5.328 |
| 26 | |||
One-way ANOVA of effect of light exposure duration as per Table 2
| *** | |||
| Are means significant different? ( | Yes | ||
| Number of groups | 6 | ||
|
| 42.04 | ||
| 0.946 | |||
| ANOVA table | SS | df | MS |
| Treatment (between columns) | 605 | 5 | 121 |
| Residual (within columns) | 34.54 | 12 | 2.878 |
| Total | 639.5 | 17 | |