| Literature DB >> 28324369 |
Digar Singh1, Anita Sharma2, Gurvinder Kaur Saini3.
Abstract
Seven endophytic bacterial isolates were finally recovered from native sugarcane varieties at hilly areas namely Berinag, Champawat and Didihat of Uttarakhand state in northern Himalayan region. New isolates and two standard cultures-Azospirillum brasilense and Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus, were evaluated for their morphological, biochemical and molecular characteristics. Morphologically all were rod shaped, Gram-negative bacteria. Their plant growth promotory properties were also assessed which proved isolates RtBn and StBn as IAA producing. Except isolate StBn, all were phosphate solubilising and except RtBn all produced siderophores. Molecular characterisation of the isolates was performed using amplified 16S r-DNA restriction analysis. Similarity index in unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean programme clustered the isolates according to their geographical distribution. Native isolates showed insignificant similarity with South American strains used as standards. nifH amplification was observed with all the isolates used in the study which again establish them as potential N-fixers.Entities:
Keywords: Biochemical; Endophytes; Gluconacetobacter; Isolation; Molecular characterisation
Year: 2012 PMID: 28324369 PMCID: PMC3646109 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-012-0084-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Characteristic features of the different isolates
| Characteristics | StBn | RtBn | StDd | RtDd | RtChI | RtChII | StCh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Place of isolation | Berinag | Berinag | Didihat | Didihat | Champawat | Champawat | Champawat |
| Plant portion | Stem | Root | Stem | Root | Root | Root | Stem |
| Colony morphology | |||||||
| Configuration | Round | Round | Oval | Oval | Round | Round | Round |
| Margins | Wavy | Wavy | Smooth | Smooth | Smooth | Smooth | Smooth |
| Elevation | Convex | Convex | Convex | Convex | Convex | Convex | Convex |
| Shape | Circular | Circular | Circular | Circular | Circular | Circular | Circular |
| Pigmentation | White | Creamy | Light creamy | Creamy | Creamy | Creamy | Creamy |
| Cell morphology | |||||||
| Gram’s reaction | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Shape | Long rods | Long rods | Short rods | Short rods | Short rods | Long rods | Long rods |
| Arrangement | Single | Single | Single | Single | Single | Paired | Single |
| PGPR properties | |||||||
| Phosphorous–solubilisation | – | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Siderophore–production | + | – | + | + | + | + | + |
| IAA-production | +(7.2 μg/ml) | +(8.92 μg/ml) | – | – | – | – | – |
| Biochemical characteristics | |||||||
| H2S production | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Gelatin hydrolysis | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Casein hydrolysis | – | – | – | – | – | + | – |
| Starch hydrolysis | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Catalase activity | + | + | + | – | – | + | + |
| Denitrification test | – | – | – | + | + | + | – |
| Cellulase activity | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
(Positive test +, Negative test −)
Carbohydrate utilisation pattern of endophytic bacterial isolates
| Carbohydrate | StBn | RtChII | StDd |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lactose | – | + | + | – |
| Xylose | – | + | + | + |
| Maltose | – | + | – | – |
| Fructose | – | + | – | – |
| Dextrose | – | + | + | + |
| Galactose | – | + | + | + |
| Raffinose | – | + | – | – |
| Trehalose | – | + | – | – |
| Melibiose | – | + | – | – |
| Sucrose | – | + | – | – |
| – | + | + | + | |
| Mannose | + | + | + | + |
| Inulin | – | – | – | – |
| Sodium gluconate | – | – | – | – |
| Glycerol | – | – | – | – |
| Salicin | – | – | – | – |
| Glucosamine | – | + | + | + |
| Dulcitol | – | + | + | + |
| Inositol | – | + | + | + |
| Sorbitol | – | – | – | – |
| Mannitol | – | + | – | – |
| Adonitol | – | + | – | – |
| α-Methyl- | – | – | – | – |
| Ribose | – | – | + | + |
| Rhamnose | – | + | – | – |
| Cellobiose | – | – | – | – |
| Melezitose | – | – | – | – |
| α-Methyl- | – | – | – | – |
| Xylitol | + | + | + | + |
| ONPG (O-nitrophenyl-β- | – | + | + | + |
| Esculin | – | + | + | + |
| – | + | + | + | |
| Citrate | – | + | + | + |
| Malonate | – | + | + | + |
| Sorbose | – | – | – | – |
(Positive test +, Negative test −)
Similarity matrix for the endophytic bacterial isolates and their Jaccard coefficient values based upon the dendrogram generated for the carbon source utilisation profiling for the selected strains and the standard used
| Similarity matrix computed with Jaccard coefficient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| StBn | RtChII | StDd |
| |
| StBn | 1 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| RtChII | 1 | 0.60 | 0.56 | |
| StDd | 1 | 0.93 | ||
|
| 1 | |||
Fig. 1a Dendrogram on the basis of carbohydrate utilisation pattern of endophytic bacterial isolates. b Combined phylogenetic tree based on ARDRA analysis using four restriction enzymes namely Alu I, Msp I, Hae III and Mnl II
Fig. 2Restriction digestion of the 16S rDNA amplicon, using enzymes. aAlu I, bMsp I, cMnl II, dHae III, enifH amplification of the isolates and standards
Similarity matrix for the endophytic bacterial isolates and their Jaccard coefficient values based upon the dendrogram generated for the combined phylogenetic (ARDRA analysis) using four restriction enzymes namely Alu I, Msp I, Hae III and Mnl II
| Similarity matrix computed with Jaccard coefficient | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St.Bn. | Rt.Dd. | St.Dd. | Rt.Ch.II. | Rt.Ch.I | St.Ch. | Rt.Bn. |
|
| |
| St.Bn. | 1 | 0.50 | 0.53 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.33 |
| Rt.Dd. | 1 | 0.90 | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.45 | 0.41 | |
| St.Dd. | 1 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.50 | 0.33 | ||
| Rt.Ch.II. | 1 | 1 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.33 | 0.54 | |||
| Rt.Ch.I | 1 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.33 | 0.54 | ||||
| St.Ch. | 1 | 1 | 0.28 | 0.11 | |||||
| Rt.Bn. | 1 | 0.28 | 0.11 | ||||||
|
| 1 | 0.10 | |||||||
|
| 1 | ||||||||