| Literature DB >> 28324344 |
Kriti Kumari Dubey1, M H Fulekar2.
Abstract
Rhizoremediation is the use of plant-microbe interaction for the enhanced degradation of contaminants. Rhizosphere bioremediation of pyrethroid pesticides will offer an attractive and potentially inexpensive approach for remediation of contaminated soil. The present study was done with the aim of establishment of highly effective remediation method using plant with degradative rhizosphere and isolation of naturally occurring rhizosphere associated potential degrader providing the possibility of both environmental and insitu detoxification of cypermethrin contamination. The remediation efficacy of Pennisetum pedicellatum was investigated using green house pot culture experiments in cypermethrin amended potting soil mix (10, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg/kg) for periodic evaluation of changes in concentration. Total proportion of cypermethrin degraders was found to be higher in rhizosphere soil compared to bulk soil. The cypermethrin degrading strain associated with rhizosphere capable of surviving at higher concentrations of cypermethrin was designated as potential degrader. On the basis of morphological characteristics, biochemical tests and 16S rDNA analysis, isolate was identified as Stenotrophomonas maltophilia MHF ENV 22. Bioremediation data of cypermethrin by strain MHF ENV22 examined by HPLC and mass spectroscopy, indicated 100, 50 and 58 % degradation within the time period of 72, 24 and 192 h at concentrations 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg, respectively. This is the first report of effective degradation of cypermethrin by Stenotrophomonas spp. isolated from rhizosphere of Pennisetum pedicellatum. Rhizoremediation strategy will be of immense importance in remediation of cypermethrin residues to a level permissible for technogenic and natural environment.Entities:
Keywords: Cypermethrin; Rhizoremediation; Soil; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia MHF ENV 22
Year: 2012 PMID: 28324344 PMCID: PMC3563741 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-012-0067-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Fig. 1First order reaction kinetics of rhizospheric dissipation of cypermethrin
Degradation kinetics data of cypermethrin in soil
| Dose (mg/kg) | Mean extraction | 7 days | 15 days | 30 days | 45 days | 60 days | T1/2 days | Regression equation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 92.60 | 88.50 | 76.40 | 54.70 | 52.80 | 35.0 | 43.31 | 4.557 − 0.016 |
| 75 | 68.90 | 53.50 | 39.0 | 28.0 | 23.31 | 19.80 | 34.65 | 4.085 − 0.020 |
| 50 | 45.0 | 34.50 | 24.32 | 17.23 | 12.0 | 7.2 | 23.89 | 3.734 − 0.029 |
| 25 | 22.10 | 14.48 | 9.0 | NDL | NDL | NDL | 11.55 | 3.09 − 0.06 |
| 10 | 8.10 | NDL | NDL | NDL | NDL | NDL | – | – |
NDL non detection limit
Fig. 2Percentage degradation of cypermethrin during rhizoremediation by P. pedicellatum
Microbial numbers in rhizoremediated bulk and rhizospheric soils (mean values ± SD) at different doses of cypermethrin
| Concentration of cypermethrin in mg/kg | Log CFU#/g soil | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total microbial numbers | Cypermethrin degrading microbial numbers | |||
| Bulk | Rhizosphere | Bulk | Rhizosphere | |
| Control | 5.43 ± 1.08 | 6.95 ± 1.37 | ND* | ND |
| 10 | 5.75 ± 1.38 | 6.83 ± 2.25 | 1.20 ± 1.21 | 1.82 ± 1.10 |
| 25 | 5.11 ± 1.73 | 6.23 ± 2.52 | 1.61 ± 0.98 | 2.16 ± 1.89 |
| 50 | 4.89 ± 1.73 | 6.02 ± 2.64 | 2.62 ± 0.70 | 3.02 ± 0.29 |
| 75 | 4.45 ± 2.24 | 5.98 ± 1.22 | 3.72 ± 1.92 | 4.21 ± 0.98 |
| 100 | 4.26 ± 2.11 | 5.23 ± 0.74 | 4.53 ± 1.72 | 5.98 ± 1.34 |
CFU colony forming unit
ND* not detected
Fig. 3Phylogenetic tree of potential degrader isolated from rhizoremediated soil (based on 16S rDNA sequence analysis). Unknown refers to S. maltophilia MHF ENV 22, the current strain reported in this study
Fig. 4Concentration of cypermethrin during bioremediation by S. maltophilia MHF ENV 22
Fig. 5Measurement of optical density (OD) at 600 nm during cypermethrin bioremediation by S. maltophilia MHF ENV 22
Fig. 6Biological oxygen demand (BOD) variations during cypermethrin bioremediation by S. maltophilia MHF ENV 22
Fig. 7Chemical oxygen demand (COD) variations during cypermethrin bioremediation by S. maltophilia MHF ENV 22
Chromatographic properties of cypermethrin metabolites during bioremediation
| Code | Compounds | |
|---|---|---|
| A | 109 | Catechol |
| B | 95 | Phenol |
| C | 141 | 2-Hydroxy-muconic- semialdehyde |