| Literature DB >> 28324308 |
Madhuri Girdhar1, Neeta Raj Sharma1, Hasibur Rehman2, Anupam Kumar1, Anand Mohan3.
Abstract
The composition and the organization of soil are changing rapidly by the diverged mankind activities, leading to the contamination of environment. Several methods are employed to clean up the environment from these kinds of contaminants, but most of them are costly and ineffective to yield optimum results. Phytoremediation is a natural green technology, which is eco-friendly for the removal of toxic metals from the polluted environment. Phytoremediation is a cost-effective technique through which the cleanup of contaminated soil laced with heavy metals is performed by wild weeds and small herbal plants. The phytoremediation technique provides a promising tool for hyperaccumulation of heavy metals; arsenic, lead, mercury, copper, chromium, and nickel, etc., by the wild weeds and that has been discussed here in detail in case of Cannabissativa, Solanum nigrum and Rorippa globosa. In general, weeds that have the intrinsic capacity to accumulate metals into their shoots and roots, have the ability to form phytochelates and formation of stable compound with ions. This behavior of accumulation along with chelate and stable compound formation is utilized as a tool for phytoremediation activity.Entities:
Keywords: Cannabis sativa; Hyperaccumulation; Intrinsic capacity; Optimum; Phytochelates; Phytoremediation; Rorippa globosa; Solanum nigrum
Year: 2014 PMID: 28324308 PMCID: PMC4235884 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-014-0194-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Fig. 1Different types of phytoremediation processes adapted from Singh et al. (2003), Suresh and Ravishankar (2004)
Few natural plant metal-hyperaccumulator species and their bioaccumulation potential
| Metals | Plant species | Amount [gm/kg (d.m.)] | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cd |
| >1 | Sun et al. ( |
| Se |
| 2.0 | Orser et al. ( |
| Cr |
| 2.9 | Gardea-Torresday et al. ( |
| Pb |
| 0.13–8.2 | Reeves and Brooks ( |
| Cd |
| 10.0 | Lombi et al. ( |
| Ni |
| >10.0 | Morrison et al. ( |
| Co |
| 10.2 | Brooks ( |
| Cu |
| 12.3 | Baker and Walker ( |
| Mn |
| 19.3 | Xue et al. ( |
| As |
| 22.6 | Ma et al. ( |
| Zn |
| 30.0 | Baker and Walker ( |
| Zn | 33.5 | Malik et al. ( | |
| Pb | >43.0 | Malik et al. ( | |
| Cu | 59.3 | Malik et al. ( |
Fig. 2Graphical representation of accumulation of toxic heavy metals by Cannabis sativa (Malik et al. 2010)
Hyperaccumulatory nature of Cannabis sativa is shown by the accumulation of various metals (mg/kg) (d.m.) in industrial areas (Malik et al. 2010)
| Concentration of metal (mg/kg) | Root | Shoot |
|---|---|---|
| Lead | 29 mg/kg | 30 mg/kg |
| Copper | 29 mg/kg | 18.2 mg/kg |
| Zinc | 27 mg/kg | 43.9 kg/kg |
| Nickel | 13.6 kg/mg | 11.3 mg/kg |
| Cobalt | 24.7 mg/kg | 14.8 mg/kg |
| Chromium | 29.7 mg/kg | 14.5 mg/kg |
Fig. 3Graphical representation of accumulation of toxic heavy metals by Solanum nigrum (Malik et al. 2010)
Hyperaccumulatory nature of S. nigrum shown by the accumulation of various metals (mg/kg) (d.m.) in industrial areas (Malik et al. 2010)
| Concentration of metal (mg/kg) | Root | Shoot |
|---|---|---|
| Lead | 20 mg/kg | 11 mg/kg |
| Copper | 13.13 mg/kg | 22.2 mg/kg |
| Zinc | 134.4 mg/kg | 50.6 kg/kg |
| Nickel | 7.8 kg/mg | 8 mg/kg |
| Cobalt | 18.5 mg/kg | 15.8 mg/kg |
| Chromium | 81.2 mg/kg | 8.9 mg/kg |
Representation of the antagonistic effect caused by the Cd and As on the bioaccumulation potential of Cd hyperaccumulator R. globosa (Sun et al. 2007)
| Concentration of Cd and As (mg/kg) | Accumulation of Cd (mg/kg) in root | Accumulation of Cd (mg/kg) in shoot |
|---|---|---|
| Ck (control) | 0 | 0 |
| Cd10 + As50 | 0.002 | 0.09 |
| Cd10 + As250 | 0 | 0.025 |
| Cd25 + As50 | 0.015 | 0.2 |
| Cd25 + As250 | 0.01 | 0.1 |
| Cd50 + As50 | 0.022 | 0.25 |
| Cd50 + As250 | 0 | 0.12 |
Fig. 4Graphical representation of antagonistic effect by Cd and As on the bioaccumulation potential of Cd hyperaccumulator R. globosa (Sun et al. 2007)