| Literature DB >> 28324294 |
Jigisha Anand1, Bhagwati Upadhyaya2, Pramod Rawat1, Nishant Rai3.
Abstract
Green tea (GT) is derived from the leaves of Camellia sinensis implicated in a wide range of health attributes. In the present comprehensive study, methanolic, acetone and aqueous extract of leaves of C. sinensis var. sinensis [Kashmir (KW), Uttarakhand (IP & PN)] and C. sinensis var. assamica (Assam, AT) were explored for their phytoconstituents. Solvent extracts of GT cultivars showed rich presence of phytoconstituents in comparison with aqueous extracts. The methanolic extract of AT and acetone extract of KW showed highest total phenol content (18.32 ± 0.357 mg of GAE equivalent/g of sample) and total flavonoid content (29.25 ± 0.015 mg of catechin equivalent/g of sample), respectively. All the cultivars revealed higher free radical scavenging activity in the range of 73.80 ± 0.152 to 82.40 ± 0.004 % confirming antioxidant potentials. The HPLC analysis of purified residue procured from solvent partitioning depicted AT with highest concentration of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg) i.e., 154.7 ± 4.949 mg/g followed by Kashmir and Uttarakhand GT cultivars. The present study revealed that Assam GT could be a potent herbal candidate with multiple nutraceutical applications. However, significant investigation of the cultivars is to be done to further explore the EGCg-dependent activity of GT for herbal drug development.Entities:
Keywords: Camellia sinensis; Flavonoid; GT; HPLC; Phytoconstituents
Year: 2014 PMID: 28324294 PMCID: PMC4434414 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-014-0230-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Fig. 1Structures of different catechins present in green tea
Fig. 2Flow diagram showing phytochemical and pharmacognostic study of GT cultivars
The nature and color of crude extracts of green tea cultivars and their yield
| Type of extract | Solvent | Green tea cultivars | Nature and color of extract | % yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | Methanolic | AT | Powdered, dark brown | 4.00 |
| KW | Coal tar form, black | 7.33 | ||
| PN | Lustrous thick, black | 12 | ||
| IP | Lustrous thick, dark green | 14.6 | ||
| Crude | Acetone | AT | Thick, viscous, dark brown | 26.8 |
| KW | Particulate, dark green | 5.06 | ||
| PN | Particulate, dark green | 9.00 | ||
| IP | Oily particulate, dark green | 3.83 | ||
| Crude extract | Aqueous | AT | Liquid, dark brown | 3.07 |
| KW | Liquid, dark brown | 7.33 | ||
| PN | Liquid, dark brown | 12.00 | ||
| IP | Liquid, dark brown | 14.6 |
Percentage yield = Weight of the sample extract obtained (g) × 100/Weight of the powdered sampled used (g)
Qualitative estimation of phytochemicals in aqueous and solvent extracts of different green tea cultivars
| Phytochemicals | Methanolic extract | Acetone extract | Aqueous extract | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT | KW | IP | PN | AT | KW | IP | PN | AT | KW | IP | PN | |
| Phytosterol | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | + |
| Carbohydrates | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | + | + | − | – |
| Saponin | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Catecholic Tannins | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | – | – | – | – |
| Alkaloids | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Flavonoids | +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | + | + | + | + |
| Anthocyanins | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Proteins | + | + | + | + | +++ | +++ | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Terpenoids | – | – | – | – | +++ | ++ | ++ | – | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ |
| Glycosides | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | + | + | + | + |
AT Assam green tea, KW Kashmir green tea, IP and PN Uttarakhand green tea
+++>++>+ indicates the intensity of color formation (difference in specific component conc. and – indicates no color (absence of specific component)
Fig. 3a Standard curve of catechin hydrate as a reference for total flavonoid content. b Standard curve of gallic acid as a reference for total phenolic content. c Standard curve for DPPH free radical scavenging activity
Quantitative estimation of total flavonoids in aqueous and solvent extracts of different green tea cultivars
| Extracts | Total flavonoids in green tea cultivars (mg of catechin equivalent/g of sample) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT | KW | IP | PN | |
| Methanolic | 16.25 ± 0.030 | 8.5 ± 0.003 | 17.4 ± 0.003 | 12.35 ± 0.013 |
| Acetone | 28.75 ± 0.010 | 29.25 ± 0.015 | 14.35 ± 0.019 | 22.15 ± 0.005 |
| Aqueous | 17.05 ± 0.007 | 26.0 ± 0.077 | 17.3 ± 0.0007 | 23.6 ± 0.017 |
AT Assam green tea, KW Kashmir green tea, IP and PN Uttarakhand green tea
Fig. 4a Comparative analysis total flavonoids in mg of catechin equivalent/g of sample among different extracts of green tea cultivars. b Comparative analysis total phenolic content in mg of Gallic equivalent/g of sample among different extracts of green tea cultivars. c Comparative analysis of DPPH free radical scavenging activity among different extracts of green tea cultivars
Quantitative estimation of total phenols in aqueous and solvent extracts of different green tea cultivars
| Extracts | Total phenols in green tea cultivars (mg of gallic acid equivalent/g of sample) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT | KW | IP | PN | |
| Methanolic | 18.32 ± 0.357 | 7.68 ± 0.165 | 3.02 ± 0.007 | 2.81 ± 0.142 |
| Acetone | 0.79 ± 0.020 | 1.4 ± 0.061 | 2.86 ± 0.074 | 2.84 ± 0.028 |
| Aqueous | 2.62 ± 0.101 | 8.41 ± 0.208 | 1.68 ± 0.0499 | 2.34 ± 0.038 |
AT Assam green tea, KW Kashmir green tea, IP and PN Uttarakhand green tea
Quantitative estimation of free radical scavenging activity by DPPH assay in aqueous and solvent extracts of different green tea cultivars
| Extracts | Free radical scavenging activity in Green tea cultivars (% inhibition of DDPH radical) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT | KW | IP | PN | |
| Methanolic | 75.30 ± 0.011 | 81.50 ± 0.002 | 77.90 ± 0.002 | 82.10 ± 0.016 |
| Acetone | 75.00 ± 0.053 | 82.10 ± 0.001 | 82.30 ± 0.0005 | 82.40 ± 0.004 |
| Aqueous | 80.10 ± 0.003 | 79.10 ± 0.003 | 81.50 ± 0.005 | 73.80 ± 0.152 |
AT Assam green tea, KW Kashmir green tea, IP and PN Uttarakhand green tea
Fig. 5a HPLC chromatogram of standard EGCg. b HPLC chromatogram of purified residues of AT, KW, PN and IP extract
Fig. 6Standard calibration curve of Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg)
Fig. 7Concentration and absorbance (280 nm) of EGCG among GT cultivars