J Bradley Layton1, Yoonsang Kim2, G Caleb Alexander3, Sherry L Emery2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2. NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland4Departments of Epidemiology and Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
Importance: Testosterone initiation increased substantially in the United States from 2000 to 2013, especially among men without clear indications. Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) also increased during this time. Objective: To investigate associations between televised DTCA and testosterone testing and initiation in the United States. Design, Setting, and Population: Ecologic study conducted in designated market areas (DMAs) in the United States. Monthly testosterone advertising ratings were linked to DMA-level testosterone use data from 2009-2013 derived from commercial insurance claims. Associations between DTCA and testosterone testing, initiation, and initiation without recent baseline tests were estimated using Poisson generalized estimating equations. Exposures: Monthly Nielsen ratings for testosterone DTCA in the 75 largest DMAs. Main Outcomes and Measures: (1) Rates of new serum testosterone testing; (2) rates of testosterone initiation (in-office injection, surgical implant, or pharmacy dispensing) for all testosterone products combined and for specific brands; and (3) rates of testosterone initiation without recent serum testosterone testing. Results: Of 17 228 599 commercially insured men in the 75 DMAs, 1 007 990 (mean age, 49.6 [SD, 11.5] years) had new serum testosterone tests and 283 317 (mean age, 51.8 [SD, 11.3] years) initiated testosterone treatment. Advertising intensity varied by geographic region and time, with the highest intensity seen in the southeastern United States and with months ranging from no ad exposures to a mean of 13.6 exposures per household. Nonbranded advertisements were common prior to 2012, with branded advertisements becoming more common during and after 2012. Each household advertisement exposure was associated with a monthly increase in rates of new testosterone testing (rate ratio [RR], 1.006; 95% CI, 1.004-1.008), initiation (RR, 1.007; 95% CI, 1.004-1.010), and initiation without a recent test (RR, 1.008; 95% CI, 1.002-1.013). Mean absolute rate increases were 0.14 tests (95% CI, 0.09-0.19), 0.05 new initiations (95% CI, 0.03-0.08), and 0.02 initiations without a recent test (95% CI, 0.01-0.03) per 10 000 men for each monthly ad exposure over the entire period. Conclusions and Relevance: Among US men residing in the 75 designated market areas, regional exposure to televised direct-to-consumer advertising was associated with greater testosterone testing, new initiation, and initiation without recent testing.
Importance: Testosterone initiation increased substantially in the United States from 2000 to 2013, especially among men without clear indications. Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) also increased during this time. Objective: To investigate associations between televised DTCA and testosterone testing and initiation in the United States. Design, Setting, and Population: Ecologic study conducted in designated market areas (DMAs) in the United States. Monthly testosterone advertising ratings were linked to DMA-level testosterone use data from 2009-2013 derived from commercial insurance claims. Associations between DTCA and testosterone testing, initiation, and initiation without recent baseline tests were estimated using Poisson generalized estimating equations. Exposures: Monthly Nielsen ratings for testosterone DTCA in the 75 largest DMAs. Main Outcomes and Measures: (1) Rates of new serum testosterone testing; (2) rates of testosterone initiation (in-office injection, surgical implant, or pharmacy dispensing) for all testosterone products combined and for specific brands; and (3) rates of testosterone initiation without recent serum testosterone testing. Results: Of 17 228 599 commercially insured men in the 75 DMAs, 1 007 990 (mean age, 49.6 [SD, 11.5] years) had new serum testosterone tests and 283 317 (mean age, 51.8 [SD, 11.3] years) initiated testosterone treatment. Advertising intensity varied by geographic region and time, with the highest intensity seen in the southeastern United States and with months ranging from no ad exposures to a mean of 13.6 exposures per household. Nonbranded advertisements were common prior to 2012, with branded advertisements becoming more common during and after 2012. Each household advertisement exposure was associated with a monthly increase in rates of new testosterone testing (rate ratio [RR], 1.006; 95% CI, 1.004-1.008), initiation (RR, 1.007; 95% CI, 1.004-1.010), and initiation without a recent test (RR, 1.008; 95% CI, 1.002-1.013). Mean absolute rate increases were 0.14 tests (95% CI, 0.09-0.19), 0.05 new initiations (95% CI, 0.03-0.08), and 0.02 initiations without a recent test (95% CI, 0.01-0.03) per 10 000 men for each monthly ad exposure over the entire period. Conclusions and Relevance: Among US men residing in the 75 designated market areas, regional exposure to televised direct-to-consumer advertising was associated with greater testosterone testing, new initiation, and initiation without recent testing.
Authors: Christina Wang; Glenn Cunningham; Adrian Dobs; Ali Iranmanesh; Alvin M Matsumoto; Peter J Snyder; Thomas Weber; Nancy Berman; Laura Hull; Ronald S Swerdloff Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Rachel Kornfield; G Caleb Alexander; Dima M Qato; Yoonsang Kim; Jan D Hirsch; Sherry L Emery Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Rebecca Vigen; Colin I O'Donnell; Anna E Barón; Gary K Grunwald; Thomas M Maddox; Steven M Bradley; Al Barqawi; Glenn Woning; Margaret E Wierman; Mary E Plomondon; John S Rumsfeld; P Michael Ho Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: William D Finkle; Sander Greenland; Gregory K Ridgeway; John L Adams; Melissa A Frasco; Michael B Cook; Joseph F Fraumeni; Robert N Hoover Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cindy Ke Zhou; Shailesh Advani; Matthew Chaloux; James Todd Gibson; Mandi Yu; Marie Bradley; Robert N Hoover; Michael B Cook Journal: J Urol Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michael B Cook; Daniel C Beachler; Lauren E Parlett; Philip T Cochetti; William D Finkle; Stephan Lanes; Robert N Hoover Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Adithya Balasubramanian; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Ashwin Srivatsav; Justin Yu; Larry I Lipshultz; Alexander W Pastuszak Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: J Bradley Layton; Dongmei Li; Christoph R Meier; Julie L Sharpless; Til Stürmer; M Alan Brookhart Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Isabelle V Carter; Michael J Callegari; Tarun K Jella; Amr Mahran; Thomas B Cwalina; Wade Muncey; Aram Loeb; Nannan Thirumavalavan Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 2.896
Authors: Guneet K Jasuja; Shalender Bhasin; Adam J Rose; Joel I Reisman; Joseph T Hanlon; Donald R Miller; Anthony P Morreale; Leonard M Pogach; Francesca E Cunningham; Angela Park; Renda S Wiener; Allen L Gifford; Dan R Berlowitz Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 6.134