Androgens are essential for the normal function of mature antral follicles but also have a role in the early stages of follicle development. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the most common cause of anovulatory infertility, is characterized by androgen excess and aberrant follicle development that includes accelerated early follicle growth. We have examined the effects of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) on development of isolated mouse preantral follicles in culture with the specific aim of investigating interaction with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), the steroidogenic pathway, and growth factors of the TGFβ superfamily that are known to have a role in early follicle development. Both testosterone and DHT stimulated follicle growth and augmented FSH-induced growth and increased the incidence of antrum formation among the granulosa cell layers of these preantral follicles after 72 hours in culture. Effects of both androgens were reversed by the androgen receptor antagonist flutamide. FSH receptor expression was increased in response to both testosterone and DHT, as was that of Star, whereas Cyp11a1 was down-regulated. The key androgen-induced changes in the TGFβ signaling pathway were down-regulation of Amh, Bmp15, and their receptors. Inhibition of Alk6 (Bmpr1b), a putative partner for Amhr2 and Bmpr2, by dorsomorphin resulted in augmentation of androgen-stimulated growth and modification of androgen-induced gene expression. Our findings point to varied effects of androgen on preantral follicle growth and function, including interaction with FSH-activated growth and steroidogenesis, and, importantly, implicate the intrafollicular TGFβ system as a key mediator of androgen action. These findings provide insight into abnormal early follicle development in PCOS.
Androgens are essential for the normal function of mature antral follicles but also have a role in the early stages of follicle development. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the most common cause of anovulatory infertility, is characterized by androgen excess and aberrant follicle development that includes accelerated early follicle growth. We have examined the effects of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) on development of isolated mouse preantral follicles in culture with the specific aim of investigating interaction with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), the steroidogenic pathway, and growth factors of the TGFβ superfamily that are known to have a role in early follicle development. Both testosterone and DHT stimulated follicle growth and augmented FSH-induced growth and increased the incidence of antrum formation among the granulosa cell layers of these preantral follicles after 72 hours in culture. Effects of both androgens were reversed by the androgen receptor antagonist flutamide. FSH receptor expression was increased in response to both testosterone and DHT, as was that of Star, whereas Cyp11a1 was down-regulated. The key androgen-induced changes in the TGFβ signaling pathway were down-regulation of Amh, Bmp15, and their receptors. Inhibition of Alk6 (Bmpr1b), a putative partner for Amhr2 and Bmpr2, by dorsomorphin resulted in augmentation of androgen-stimulated growth and modification of androgen-induced gene expression. Our findings point to varied effects of androgen on preantral follicle growth and function, including interaction with FSH-activated growth and steroidogenesis, and, importantly, implicate the intrafollicular TGFβ system as a key mediator of androgen action. These findings provide insight into abnormal early follicle development in PCOS.
It has long been recognized that androgens have a physiological role in normal ovarian
function. Androgens provide an obligatory substrate for estradiol production by maturing
antral follicles [and may enhance either basal or follicle-stimulating hormone
(FSH)–induced steroidogenesis by isolated granulosa cells (GCs)] (1–4), but there is also evidence that
androgens may be necessary for the earliest stages of ovarian follicle development. Mice
lacking a functional androgen receptor (AR) have impaired fertility (reduced litter size
and/or reduced reproductive lifespan) but also show impaired growth and enhanced atresia of
preantral follicles (5–7). Both
aromatizable and nonaromatizable androgens have been shown to stimulate growth of isolated
mouse preantral follicles (1) and effect activation
of follicle development in fragments of bovine ovarian cortex (8, 9).Exposure to excess androgen, however, is associated with ovarian dysfunction. In
experimental animals, androgens inhibit proliferation (10) and increase apoptosis (11) in GCs
from mature rat follicles. Importantly, ovarian dysfunction is a major feature of women
with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a very common endocrine disorder in which ovarian
hyperandrogenism is the key biochemical feature (12,
13). Infrequent or absent ovulation is characteristic, and this is associated
with arrest of antral follicles during the final stages of maturation (14). However, anovulation in PCOS is also associated
with aberrant development of preantral follicles, the key features of which are increased
activation of follicle growth from the primordial stage (15) and enhanced GC proliferation in small preantral follicles (16) coupled with apparent “stockpiling”
of follicles at the primary stage (17). Thus,
ovarian dysfunction in PCOS would seem to have its origins at the earliest stages of
follicle development at a point when, under physiological conditions, gonadotropin action
is not obligatory and local growth factors are likely to play an important role.
Furthermore, the abnormalities observed in preantral follicle development are characterized
by enhanced rather than impaired activation and growth, and there is evidence that
androgens may play a part.The prenatally androgenized (PA) sheep is a well-established large animal model of PCOS.
Lambs born to ewes that have been exposed during pregnancy to large doses of exogenous
testosterone or dihydrotestosterone (DHT) have both reproductive and metabolic
abnormalities that are reminiscent of PCOS (18,
19). Critically, ovarian dysfunction includes not only evidence of disrupted
neuroendocrine control of the ovulation cycle but also abnormal preantral follicle
development. In particular, the pattern of early follicle development in the ovaries of the
PA sheep mirrors that observed in ovarian tissue from women with PCOS; the proportion of
growing follicles is increased, and the primordial follicle population reciprocally
diminished in ovary cortex from PA compared with control animals (20, 21).We have previously used isolated mouse preantral follicles in culture to examine the direct
effects, on early developing follicles, of growth factors on follicle growth, GC
proliferation and gene expression (22, 23). Here
we have applied this methodology to the investigation of the effects of androgens with the
specific aims of investigating the interaction of androgens with FSH and with growth
factors of the TGFβ superfamily. These growth factors have a key
role in ovarian follicular function, and our previous studies of isolated mouse preantral
follicles have provided evidence for the involvement of both inhibitory and stimulatory
TGFβ molecules (and their endogenous inhibitors and binding
proteins) in growth and function of small preantral follicles (22, 23).
Material and Methods
Tissue collection, follicle isolation, and culture
Whole ovaries were collected from C57BL/6 female mice aged 15 to 16 and 28 days
postpartum (Harlan, Shardlow, United Kingdom). Mice were housed in accordance with
the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986 and associated Codes of Practice.
Ovaries were removed, and those from 28-day-old mice were fixed in 10% neutral
buffered formalin (Sigma Aldrich Company, Dorset, United Kingdom). Preantral
follicles were mechanically isolated from mice aged 15 to 16 days using acupuncture
needles, as previously described (22, 23),
and placed in Liebovitz L15 medium (Life Technologies, Paisley, United Kingdom)
supplemented with 1% (weight/volume) bovine serum albumin (Sigma). Individual
follicles were then transferred into a single well (one follicle per well) in a
96-well plate containing 100 µL Minimal Essential Medium alpha
(MEM-α, Life Technologies) supplemented with 0.1% bovine
serum albumin, 75 µg/mL penicillin (Sigma), 100 µg/mL streptomycin
sulfate (Sigma), and a cocktail of 5 µg/mL insulin, 5 µg/mL
transferrin, and 5 ng/mL sodium selenite (Sigma). Isolated follicles from each ovary
were distributed randomly (by picking up from a slightly out-of-focus drop of culture
medium) and evenly between treatments in a single 96-well plate. Up to six ovaries
(plates) were cultured per experiment. Follicles were incubated in a humidified
incubator in 5% CO2 at 37°C for up to 72 hours.
Analysis of follicle development
Follicles were photographed daily, and follicle area or diameter was measured using
ImageJ 1.45s (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) at each time point. At the end of culture
period, follicles were either snap frozen for expression studies or fixed in formalin
for immunofluorescence studies.During the course of this study, images and growth data on 1307 follicles were
acquired. These images, taken at 24-hour intervals, as well as measurements were
imported into a custom-made database (FileMaker Pro 11.v2; http://www.filemaker.com). This allowed automatic calculation of
cumulative follicle growth in terms of relative size compared with the start of
culture (time 0) for each follicle, as well as follicle diameter. The database also
facilitated inspection of follicles during development, annotation of morphological
features, and the implementation of strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Follicle
images were scored by one observer in a database layout that lacked information about
treatment. Follicles with a central spherical oocyte and intact layer of GCs were
included in the analysis [Fig. 1(a)]. Follicles
were excluded from analysis if, at the start of culture, their oocyte was misshapen
[Fig. 1(b) and 1(g)] or extruded from the follicle, if the follicle was atretic (darkened
GCs) [Fig. 1(e) and 1(f)], or if the basal lamina was damaged with the oocyte being
subsequently extruded from the follicle during culture [Fig. 1(c)]. Follicles were also excluded from analysis if they died during
culture, with oocyte extrusion or the onset of atresia [Fig. 1(d)].
Figure 1.
Morphology of manually isolated follicles that were included in the analysis
(a; 84%) or excluded from analysis because of damage or atresia at the start of
culture (b, c, e, f, and g; <15%) or onset of atresia during culture (d;
<1%). (a) Healthy follicle cultured under control conditions (72 hours)
with a central oocyte (O) and even layer of GCs. Follicle diameter shown in
each image. The white dotted line (a’’’) indicates the
basal lamina surrounding the GCs and shows the area that is measured. A
nucleolus is arrowed (white arrowhead). Note the lack of theca cells on the
basal lamina. (b) Follicle with indistinct oocyte (white arrow) that becomes
increasingly misshapen and shrunken with time. (c) Follicle with damaged basal
lamina (black arrow), resulting in extrusion of GCs (white arrow). With time in
culture, the oocyte is extruded through the breach (black arrow). (d) Follicle
that appears healthy at 0 hours but becomes atretic from 24 hours, with
rounding up and progressive darkening of the GCs and loss of the basal lamina.
(e and f) Atretic follicles at the start of culture (0 hours) with a detached
basal lamina (black arrows) and darkened GCs. (g) Follicle with collapsing,
indistinct oocyte (white arrow, 0 hours). (h) Sparse theca cells (black arrows)
on basal lamina. Scale bars = 50 µm (a–g) and 25 µm
(h).
Morphology of manually isolated follicles that were included in the analysis
(a; 84%) or excluded from analysis because of damage or atresia at the start of
culture (b, c, e, f, and g; <15%) or onset of atresia during culture (d;
<1%). (a) Healthy follicle cultured under control conditions (72 hours)
with a central oocyte (O) and even layer of GCs. Follicle diameter shown in
each image. The white dotted line (a’’’) indicates the
basal lamina surrounding the GCs and shows the area that is measured. A
nucleolus is arrowed (white arrowhead). Note the lack of theca cells on the
basal lamina. (b) Follicle with indistinct oocyte (white arrow) that becomes
increasingly misshapen and shrunken with time. (c) Follicle with damaged basal
lamina (black arrow), resulting in extrusion of GCs (white arrow). With time in
culture, the oocyte is extruded through the breach (black arrow). (d) Follicle
that appears healthy at 0 hours but becomes atretic from 24 hours, with
rounding up and progressive darkening of the GCs and loss of the basal lamina.
(e and f) Atretic follicles at the start of culture (0 hours) with a detached
basal lamina (black arrows) and darkened GCs. (g) Follicle with collapsing,
indistinct oocyte (white arrow, 0 hours). (h) Sparse theca cells (black arrows)
on basal lamina. Scale bars = 50 µm (a–g) and 25 µm
(h).The database also expedited search and export of data for follicles cultured under
the same conditions for several further investigations, providing an extended dataset
for analysis of developmental and morphological features such as antrum formation or
for comparing development of follicles of differing sizes in various treatments.
Effect of androgens on preantral follicle development
Isolated follicles were cultured in either control medium or with androgen (either 10
nM DHT or 10 nM testosterone; Sigma) in the presence and absence of 20 µM
flutamide (a competitive AR inhibitor; Sigma). DHT, testosterone, and flutamide were
dissolved in ethanol, and the final concentration of ethanol in each treatment and in
control wells was 0.1%.
Effect of initial follicle size on responsiveness to DHT
Upon completion of all the culture experiments, the database was mined for follicles
cultured under control conditions and in the presence of DHT alone. Follicles were
grouped in five bins according to initial diameter at 0 hours: <100, 100 to
109.99, 110 to 119.99, 120 to 129.99, and ≥130 µm in diameter. The
overall growth of follicles in the presence and absence of DHT was compared using
linear regression (Prism 6 for Mac OS X, version 6.0a; http://www.graphpad.com).
Effect of DHT on AR expression
Mechanically isolated follicles cultured for 24 or 72 hours in the presence or
absence of 10 nM DHT were formalin fixed and set in 2% (weight/volume)
low-melting-point agarose (Sigma) before being dehydrated through an alcohol series,
embedded in wax, and serially sectioned (5 µm) onto Superfrost charged slides
(VWR, Lutterworth, United Kingdom). Immunofluoresence detection of AR was carried out
as described later, and one central section of each follicle was selected for
analysis. Confocal images of individual follicles were imported into ImageJ and split
into red-green-blue channels. Blue 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI)–labeled nuclei were thresholded (same threshold value for all
follicles) to produce a binary image (white DAPI, positive; black DAPI, negative) and
define the nuclei. Nuclei were outlined using the “Analyze Particles”
command. In the green channel, AR labeling was thresholded (with the same threshold
maintained for all follicles), the nuclear outlines were overlaid, and the area of
labeling exceeding the threshold was measured within the nuclear outlines, and for
the GC layer as a whole. The proportion of nuclear area or GC area that exceeded the
threshold (i.e., the proportion of the nuclei, or GC layer, that was
AR positive) was compared for control and DHT-treated follicles at 24 and 72
hours.
Antrum formation
The database was further used for investigating antrum formation in the presence and
absence of DHT and under other treatment conditions. An antrum was clearly visible as
a translucent area with a clear margin in the GCs. Images were inspected and
annotated for appearance of an early antrum by 72 hours of culture.
Effect of androgen and FSH on preantral follicle growth
Follicles were treated with control medium (including 0.1% ethanol vehicle) or with
10 nM DHT and/or 10 ng/mL FSH (recombinant human FSH; National Hormone and Peptide
Program, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Dr. A.F.
Parlow, Torrance, CA). Follicles were maintained in culture for 24, 48, or 72 hours
before being frozen for gene expression studies as previously described. Images of
each individually cultured follicle were taken at 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours, as
appropriate.
Effect of inhibiting Alk6 on DHT action
Dorsomorphin (DSM; Sigma) was used as an inhibitor of the type I
TGFβ receptors ALK2, ALK3, and ALK6 (24). Follicles were cultured with vehicle alone, 10 nM DHT alone,
DHT and 1 µM DSM (23), and DSM alone
for 72 hours. Follicle growth was assessed as described previously. At the end of
culture, follicles were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for gene expression studies,
as described later.
Expression studies
At the end of each appropriate culture period, approximately five follicles per
treatment group were pooled into one tube and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Samples
were then processed for RNA extraction using RNeasy microcolumns as per
manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Manchester, United Kingdom). The
resulting RNA was concentrated using vacuum centrifugation to provide a final volume
of approximately 5 µL and converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) using
SuperScript III reverse transcription and random hexamers, according to
manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies). cDNA products were used for
quantitative polymerase chain reaction as previously described (23). Briefly, primers were designed using Primer3 plus v2.3.6
software (Table 1). cDNA or water (control)
was added to a reaction mix that included 500 nM of appropriate primers (ROX, KAPA
SYBR FAST; KAPA Biosystems Limited, London, United Kingdom) and nuclease-free water.
Each sample or control mix was plated in duplicate, and amplification was carried out
using an Applied Biosystems 7900HT Fast instrument. A melt curve analysis was carried
out on each sample. Atp5b (Primer Design, Southampton, United
Kingdom) was determined to be an appropriate internal reference gene and therefore
used in this series of studies. Expression levels were normalized to the internal
reference gene and calculated as fold changes relative to the untreated control
group, using the 2-delta-delta-cycle threshold method (25).
Table 1.
Primers Used for Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays
Gene Symbol
Primer Sequence
(5′-3′)
GenBank Accession
Product Size (bp)
Amh
Fwd: ggggcacacagaacctct
NM_007445.2
124
Rev:
gcaccttctctgcttggttg
Bmp15
Fwd: gagaaccgcacgattggag
NM_009757.4
134
Rev:
agttcgtatgctacctggtttg
Gdf9
Fwd: tcacctctacaataccgtccgg
NM_008110.2
139
Rev:
gagcaagtgttccatggcagtc
Fshr
Fwd: acaactgtgcattcaacggaac
NM_013523.3
187
Rev:
gacctggccctcaacttctt
Ar
Fwd: attctggatgggactgatg
NM_013476.4
246
Rev:
gcccatccactggaataatg
Star
Fwd: aagaacaacccttgagcacct
NM_011485.4
267
Rev:
ctccctgctggatgtaggac
Cyp11a1
Fwd: ctgggcactttggagtcagt
NM_019779.3
185
Rev:
aggacgattcggtctttcttc
Amhr2
Fwd: acagcatgaccatatcgttcg
NM_144547.2
122
Rev:
gagtcaagtagtggcataaggag
Bmpr2
Fwd: actgggaggtgtttatgaggtg
NM_007561.4
150
Rev:
ggaacttgggtctctgcttct
Alk3 (Bmpr1a)
Fwd: tgactttagcaccagaggatacc
NM_009758.4
177
Rev:
cagagccttcatacttcatacacc
Alk4 (Acvr1b)
Fwd: caacatgaagcactttgactcc
NM_007395.3
177
Rev:
tcacatacaacctttcgcatct
Alk5 (Tgfbr1)
Fwd: attgctccaaaccacagagtag
NM_009370.3
157
Rev:
caccaatagaacagcgtcgag
Alk6 (Bmpr1b)
Fwd: aggaggatggagagagtacagc
NM_007560.4
166
Rev:
ccagaggtgacaacaggcatt
Primers Used for Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction AssaysAntibody TableAbbreviation: RRID, Research Resource Identifier.
Immunofluorescence studies
Whole formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovaries were serially sectioned (5 µm)
to examine AR protein expression. For examination of the effect of treatment on AR
protein expression, cell proliferation, and apoptosis, formalin-fixed, cultured
follicles were set in 2% (weight/volume) low-melting-point agarose (Sigma) before
being dehydrated through an alcohol series, embedded in wax, and serially sectioned
(5 µm) onto Superfrost charged slides (VWR, Lutterworth, United Kingdom).
Ovary and follicle sections were dewaxed and rehydrated prior to boiling in citrate
buffer (10 mM citric acid, pH 6.0) and blocking of nonspecific binding within 20%
normal goat serum (Sigma). After this, with no washing step, sections were incubated
in rabbit anti-mouse AR antibody NR-20 (sc-816, 1:200 dilution; Santa Cruz, Dallas,
TX), rabbit anti-mouse D3B5 Ki67 (1:200; New England Biolabs, Hitchin, United
Kingdom), or rabbit anti-mouse cleaved caspase-3 (1:200; 9664, Cell Signaling)
diluted in 2% normal goat serum (Table 2). The
latter were subsequently exposed to a 1:9 ratio of terminal
deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) enzyme:label
(Roche) for 60 minutes at 37°C after phosphate-buffered saline washes. The
negative control for AR immunofluorescence was rabbit immunoglobulin G (Sigma i8140)
at the same concentration as that used for the primary antibody (0.5 µg/mL).
The primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C and then detected using
an appropriate goat anti-rabbit Alexafluor secondary antibody (1:500; Life
Technologies). All unstained nuclei were then visualized by incubation with DAPI
(1:1000; Life Technologies) before sections were mounted under coverslips using
Prolong Gold mounting medium containing DAPI (Life Technologies). Sections were
visualized (×63 objective) and captured using a Leica inverted SP5 confocal
laser-scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems, Cambridge, United Kingdom).
Table 2.
Antibody Table
Peptide/Protein Target
Antigen Sequence
Name of Antibody
Manufacturer, Catalog No., RRID
No.
Species Raised in Monoclonal or
Polyclonal
Dilution Used
RRID
Androgen receptor
Epitope mapping at N terminus
AR (N-20)
Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-816
Rabbit, polyclonal
1 in 200
AB_1563391
Ki67
Recombinant protein specific to the amino
terminus of Ki-67 protein
Large fragment (17/19 kDa) resulting from
cleavage adjacent to Asp175
Cleaved caspase-3 (Asp175; 5A1E)
Cell Signaling Technology, 9664
Rabbit, monoclonal
1 in 200
AB_2070042
Abbreviation: RRID, Research Resource Identifier.
Ki67-positive, caspase-positive, TUNEL-positive, and unlabeled DAPI-stained cells or
nuclei were counted using the ImageJ plugin “cell counter.jar”
(https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/plugins/cell-counter.html) within ImageJ
(1.45s). DAPI-labeled (blue), Ki67-positive (green), and TUNEL-positive (green)
nuclei or caspase-positive (red) cells were counted in a single midsection of the
follicle, and the proportion of Ki67-positive, caspase-positive, or TUNEL-positive
nuclei/cells was calculated.
Statistics
The relative area of follicles in different treatments (area at timex/area
at time0, where timex = 24, 48, or 72) was compared at each
time point using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the appropriate
post hoc test for multiple comparisons (Prism 6). Gene expression
values were log2 transformed, and the difference between treatments was
analyzed using a t test. In all cases, a P value
less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Follicle culture
In this study, a total of 1307 follicles from 45 ovaries were cultured in various
conditions. On average, 29 ± 0.68 follicles (mean and standard error of the
mean [SEM]; range 22 to 40) per ovary were cultured and evenly distributed between
treatments. Overall, less than 15% of follicles placed in culture were found, upon
closer high-power inspection, to be either atretic or damaged at the outset (Fig. 1) and were therefore excluded from further
analysis. A very small number of follicles (12) died during culture: four controls, three cultured in DHT alone and five
in DHT plus FSH.
Effect of androgens on preantral follicle growth
DHT at doses of between 1 and 100 nM resulted in an increase in follicle growth
compared with vehicle alone at 24, 48, and 72 hours in culture [Fig. 2(a)]. Although the largest response was achieved with a dose
of 100 nM, there was little difference between the effects of the different doses. A
similar dose-response range was found for the effects of testosterone on follicle
growth (data not shown). In all subsequent studies, a dose of 10 nM DHT or
testosterone (approximating to physiological serum concentrations of testosterone)
was therefore used.
Figure 2.
Follicle growth in vitro in response to DHT and testosterone.
(a) Response of individual follicles to increasing concentrations of DHT. The
relative area of follicles in different treatments (area at
timex/area at time0, where timex = 24, 48, or
72) was compared at each time point using one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s
multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 0.0001. Values
are mean and 95% confidence interval. Numbers in parentheses are numbers of
follicles. (b) Response of follicles to DHT (10 nM) in the presence of
increasing doses of the AR inhibitor flutamide (Flut). Values are mean and 95%
confidence interval. Statistical analysis as in a. *P
< 0.05, **P < 0.01,
****P < 00001. (c)
Response of follicles to DHT (10 nM) or testosterone (10 nM) in the absence and
presence of flutamide (20 μM). DHT- and T-stimulated follicle growth was
reversed by flutamide. Values are mean and 95% confidence interval. Statistical
analysis as in a. *P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 00001. (d)
Effect of DHT on in vitro growth of follicles of different
initial sizes. Values are means and standard deviation, and lines are
regression slopes. Slopes were compared using linear regression. Follicles
larger than 130 µm in diameter at the start of culture did not grow more
in the presence of DHT. Con, control.
Follicle growth in vitro in response to DHT and testosterone.
(a) Response of individual follicles to increasing concentrations of DHT. The
relative area of follicles in different treatments (area at
timex/area at time0, where timex = 24, 48, or
72) was compared at each time point using one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s
multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 0.0001. Values
are mean and 95% confidence interval. Numbers in parentheses are numbers of
follicles. (b) Response of follicles to DHT (10 nM) in the presence of
increasing doses of the AR inhibitor flutamide (Flut). Values are mean and 95%
confidence interval. Statistical analysis as in a. *P
< 0.05, **P < 0.01,
****P < 00001. (c)
Response of follicles to DHT (10 nM) or testosterone (10 nM) in the absence and
presence of flutamide (20 μM). DHT- and T-stimulated follicle growth was
reversed by flutamide. Values are mean and 95% confidence interval. Statistical
analysis as in a. *P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 00001. (d)
Effect of DHT on in vitro growth of follicles of different
initial sizes. Values are means and standard deviation, and lines are
regression slopes. Slopes were compared using linear regression. Follicles
larger than 130 µm in diameter at the start of culture did not grow more
in the presence of DHT. Con, control.Flutamide inhibited DHT-induced follicle growth in a dose-dependent manner [Fig. 2(b)], but as the effect was significant only
at a flutamide concentration of 20 μM, this dose was used in further
studiesThe effects of DHT (a nonaromatizable androgen) and testosterone (an aromatizable
androgen) were compared. Both androgens significantly increased follicle growth over
72 hours in culture [Fig. 2(c)]. At all time
points, DHT and testosterone did not significantly differ in their stimulatory effect
on follicle growth. The addition of flutamide to androgen-treated follicles inhibited
the effect of both androgens and brought follicle growth back in line with
controls.We were interested in whether the responsiveness of preantral follicles to DHT
changed with follicle size. Taking an overview of all the data that we collated in
the database during these studies, we explored how DHT affected the growth of
follicles of different sizes. Isolated follicles placed in culture ranged in size
from 75 to 150 µm in diameter. Intriguingly, although smaller follicles grew
significantly more in the presence of DHT, there was no significant increase in the
growth of larger follicles (>130 µm) with DHT. This suggests that these
follicles have become less androgen responsive [Fig.
2(d)].
Expression of AR in whole mouse ovary and in cultured follicles
Immunofluorescence for AR showed expression in follicles from the primordial stage
onwards in day 17 ovary [Fig. 3(a)]. In
primordial and transitional follicles, AR appeared to be expressed in the ooplasm
more strongly than at later stages, and even in very early follicles, AR was clearly
present in GCs [Fig. 3(c)].
Figure 3.
AR is present in oocytes, GCs, and theca cells of preantral follicles, and
overall expression and nuclear localization of AR increases in the presence of
DHT. (a) AR expression (green) in mouse prepubertal mouse ovary on day 17
postpartum. DAPI-labeled nuclei are blue. Scale bar = 50 µm. White
dotted lines indicate basal lamina surrounding follicles. (b) Rabbit
immunoglobulin G control. Scale bar = 25 µm. (c) Strong labeling of
ooplasm (white arrow) and GC cytoplasm (white arrowhead) in primordial and
transitional follicles. Scale bar is 25 µm. (d–m) Quantification
of AR in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of follicles cultured in
the absence (d–h) and presence (i–m) of DHT. (d and i) Confocal
image of follicle showing expression of AR (green) and DAPI-labeled nuclei
(blue). Scale bars = 25 µm. White dotted box defines enlarged images
(e–h and j–m). Images were imported into ImageJ and split into
red-green-blue channels. Blue DAPI-labeled nuclei (e and j) were thresholded (f
and k; where white is DAPI positive and black DAPI negative), and nuclei were
outlined using the “Analyze Particles” command (f and k). In the
green channel, AR labeling (g and l) was thresholded (with the same threshold
maintained for all follicles), the nuclear outlines were overlaid, and the area
of labeling exceeding the threshold was measured within the nuclear outlines (h
and m), and for the GC layer as a whole. Yellow arrows (h) indicate nuclei with
little nuclear AR, and yellow arrowheads (m) indicate nuclei with strong
nuclear AR. White arrowheads (l and m) show strong AR expression in theca cell
nuclei. Values were plotted and compared between treatments using a
Mann-Whitney test. Overall AR protein expression in the GC layer was
significantly increased after 24 hours (n) and 72 hours (p) culture in the
presence of DHT. Nuclear localization of AR was also significantly increased in
the presence of DHT at 24 hours (o) and 72 hours (q). 1°+, primary stage
with second layer of GCs appearing; 2°, secondary stage; e1°,
early primary; ose, ovarian surface epithelium; p, primordial; T, theca; t,
transitional.
AR is present in oocytes, GCs, and theca cells of preantral follicles, and
overall expression and nuclear localization of AR increases in the presence of
DHT. (a) AR expression (green) in mouse prepubertal mouse ovary on day 17
postpartum. DAPI-labeled nuclei are blue. Scale bar = 50 µm. White
dotted lines indicate basal lamina surrounding follicles. (b) Rabbit
immunoglobulin G control. Scale bar = 25 µm. (c) Strong labeling of
ooplasm (white arrow) and GC cytoplasm (white arrowhead) in primordial and
transitional follicles. Scale bar is 25 µm. (d–m) Quantification
of AR in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of follicles cultured in
the absence (d–h) and presence (i–m) of DHT. (d and i) Confocal
image of follicle showing expression of AR (green) and DAPI-labeled nuclei
(blue). Scale bars = 25 µm. White dotted box defines enlarged images
(e–h and j–m). Images were imported into ImageJ and split into
red-green-blue channels. Blue DAPI-labeled nuclei (e and j) were thresholded (f
and k; where white is DAPI positive and black DAPI negative), and nuclei were
outlined using the “Analyze Particles” command (f and k). In the
green channel, AR labeling (g and l) was thresholded (with the same threshold
maintained for all follicles), the nuclear outlines were overlaid, and the area
of labeling exceeding the threshold was measured within the nuclear outlines (h
and m), and for the GC layer as a whole. Yellow arrows (h) indicate nuclei with
little nuclear AR, and yellow arrowheads (m) indicate nuclei with strong
nuclear AR. White arrowheads (l and m) show strong AR expression in theca cell
nuclei. Values were plotted and compared between treatments using a
Mann-Whitney test. Overall AR protein expression in the GC layer was
significantly increased after 24 hours (n) and 72 hours (p) culture in the
presence of DHT. Nuclear localization of AR was also significantly increased in
the presence of DHT at 24 hours (o) and 72 hours (q). 1°+, primary stage
with second layer of GCs appearing; 2°, secondary stage; e1°,
early primary; ose, ovarian surface epithelium; p, primordial; T, theca; t,
transitional.Immunofluorescence labeling of AR in follicles cultured in the presence and absence
of DHT for 24 and 72 hours was quantified in the GC layer, as well as specifically in
the nuclei [Fig. 3(d–m)]. DHT treatment
resulted in significantly increased expression of AR in the GCs following 24 hours
[Fig. 3(n)] and 72 hours [Fig. 3(p)] of culture. Furthermore, translocation
of AR to the nucleus was minimal in control follicles [Fig. 3(h)] but was significantly increased in follicles exposed to DHT at
both time points [Fig. 3(m), 3(o), and 3(q)]. Strong labeling of theca cell nuclei for AR was also observed
following DHT treatment [Fig. 3(l) and 3(m), white arrows].
DHT and antrum formation
Examination of 219 follicles cultured under control conditions and 216 follicles
cultured with DHT alone that were identified from the database showed that
significantly (P < 0.0001) more follicles cultured in DHT
developed an antrum during 72 hours of culture [Fig.
4(a–g)]. We expected that this would be due to the increased
follicle growth observed in the presence of DHT and that antra would be seen in the
largest follicles. Surprisingly, we found that there was no significant difference in
diameter between follicles with and without an antrum in the presence of DHT [Fig. 4(h)], suggesting that this developmental
change is not due to accelerated growth but to another, as yet unknown,
mechanism.
Figure 4.
Follicles cultured in the presence of DHT had a 10-fold increased incidence of
early antrum formation. (a) The number of follicles in the absence and presence
of DHT that formed an antrum by 72 hours of culture. Numbers above the bars are
the percentage of follicles that formed an antrum (P <
0.0001; two-sided Fisher’s exact test. (b–f) Examples of
preantral follicles with an antrum (arrowed, translucent area within the GCs)
cultured in DHT. (g) Confocal image of DHT-treated follicle exposed to DHT
in vitro with oocyte (ooc) and antrum arrowed. (h) Diameter
of follicles at 48 hours (i.e., at the onset of possible
antrum formation) that did, or did not, have an antrum at 72 hours. Four
statistical comparisons were made (to compare diameter of follicles with and
without antra within a treatment; and of follicles with, or without, antra
between treatments) using one-way ANOVA with a Sidak’s multiple
comparison test. ***P < 0.001. ns,
not significant.
Follicles cultured in the presence of DHT had a 10-fold increased incidence of
early antrum formation. (a) The number of follicles in the absence and presence
of DHT that formed an antrum by 72 hours of culture. Numbers above the bars are
the percentage of follicles that formed an antrum (P <
0.0001; two-sided Fisher’s exact test. (b–f) Examples of
preantral follicles with an antrum (arrowed, translucent area within the GCs)
cultured in DHT. (g) Confocal image of DHT-treated follicle exposed to DHT
in vitro with oocyte (ooc) and antrum arrowed. (h) Diameter
of follicles at 48 hours (i.e., at the onset of possible
antrum formation) that did, or did not, have an antrum at 72 hours. Four
statistical comparisons were made (to compare diameter of follicles with and
without antra within a treatment; and of follicles with, or without, antra
between treatments) using one-way ANOVA with a Sidak’s multiple
comparison test. ***P < 0.001. ns,
not significant.The stimulatory action of DHT on follicle growth was accompanied by increased protein
expression of the proliferation marker Ki67 in GCs of preantral follicles following
both 24 and 72 hours of culture [Fig.
5(a–d)]. Follicles were assessed after 24 and 72 hours of culture
for evidence of apoptosis using dual labeling for TUNEL [Fig. 5(e) and 5(f)] and
active caspase-3 [Fig. 5(g) and 5(h)]. There was no significant difference between
control and DHT-treated follicles in the incidence of these apoptotic markers.
Generally, apoptosis was observed in a small proportion of GCs at 24 hours [Fig. 5(i) and 5(j)] and 72 hours [Fig. 5(m) and
5(n)], with the exception of a few follicles
showing more widespread TUNEL labeling [Fig.
5(k) and 5(l)].
Figure 5.
Follicles cultured in the presence of DHT had a greater proportion of
Ki67-positive (green) nuclei than in control conditions after 24 hours (a) and
72 hours (b) of culture. Bars are means and 95% confidence interval; treatments
were compared using an unpaired t test.
**P < 0.01. (c and d) Confocal images
of Ki-67–positive nuclei (green); scale bars = 50 µm.
(e–h) There was no significant effect of treatment on TUNEL (e and f,
green) and caspase (g and h, red) expression in control and DHT-treated
follicles at 24 and 72 hours. Bars are medians; treatments were compared using
a Mann-Whitney test. (i–g) Confocal images of TUNEL-labeled (green) and
active caspase-positive GCs (red) in follicles at 24 hours (i and j) and 72
hours (k–n) cultured in the absence (i, k, and m) and presence (j, l,
and n) of DHT. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars = 25
µm (i–n).
Follicles cultured in the presence of DHT had a greater proportion of
Ki67-positive (green) nuclei than in control conditions after 24 hours (a) and
72 hours (b) of culture. Bars are means and 95% confidence interval; treatments
were compared using an unpaired t test.
**P < 0.01. (c and d) Confocal images
of Ki-67–positive nuclei (green); scale bars = 50 µm.
(e–h) There was no significant effect of treatment on TUNEL (e and f,
green) and caspase (g and h, red) expression in control and DHT-treated
follicles at 24 and 72 hours. Bars are medians; treatments were compared using
a Mann-Whitney test. (i–g) Confocal images of TUNEL-labeled (green) and
active caspase-positive GCs (red) in follicles at 24 hours (i and j) and 72
hours (k–n) cultured in the absence (i, k, and m) and presence (j, l,
and n) of DHT. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bars = 25
µm (i–n).
Interaction of DHT with FSH
FSH (10 ng/mL) significantly increased the proportionate growth of cultured preantral
follicles compared with control. When DHT was added to the cultures, the combination
of DHT and FSH increased follicle growth in comparison with either individual
treatment alone after 24 hours and, particularly, after 48 and 72 hours in culture
[Fig. 6(a)]. Interestingly, we observed that,
after 72 hours in culture with the combined treatment of DHT and FSH (but not with
the individual treatments alone), the basal lamina surrounding the GC layers in some
follicles was disrupted, allowing extrusion of some GCs vertically as well as
horizontally, and thereby possibly decreasing the precision of follicle
measurement.
Figure 6.
(a) FSH further stimulates DHT-stimulated follicle growth after 48 hours of
culture. Relative area of follicles in different treatments was compared at
each time point using one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparisons
test. *P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 00001. Values
are mean and 95% confidence interval. Numbers in parentheses are numbers of
follicles. (b) Growth trajectory over time of follicles cultured in the absence
and presence of DHT and/or FSH. A combination of DHT and FSH stimulates a
greater rate of growth than DHT alone (P < 0.0001), FSH
alone (P < 0.0001), or control (P
< 0.0001). FSH or DHT alone stimulates a greater rate of growth than
control (FSH, P < 0.0001; DHT, P
< 0.002). The rate of growth in FSH alone is significantly greater than
that in DHT alone (P < 0.0004). Values are means and
SEM, and lines are regression slopes. Slopes were compared using linear
regression. Numbers in parentheses are numbers of follicles. (c) Follicles
cultured in the presence of DHT and increasing doses of FSH showed significant
growth enhancement in the presence of 1 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL FSH, but not in the
lowest dose of FSH (0.1 ng/mL). Statistical comparisons as in a. (d) Change in
expression of Fshr and Star in four samples
of five follicles, each cultured for 24 hours in the presence of DHT alone, FSH
alone, or DHT and FSH in combination. Data have been log2
transformed, and treatments were compared with control (0) and between
treatments using an unpaired t test. Fold change indicated in
right-hand y axis. Asterisks by error bars indicate a significant difference in
expression from control; differences between treatments are indicated by
asterisks on horizontal lines. P values as in a. Values are
mean and SEM.
(a) FSH further stimulates DHT-stimulated follicle growth after 48 hours of
culture. Relative area of follicles in different treatments was compared at
each time point using one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparisons
test. *P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 00001. Values
are mean and 95% confidence interval. Numbers in parentheses are numbers of
follicles. (b) Growth trajectory over time of follicles cultured in the absence
and presence of DHT and/or FSH. A combination of DHT and FSH stimulates a
greater rate of growth than DHT alone (P < 0.0001), FSH
alone (P < 0.0001), or control (P
< 0.0001). FSH or DHT alone stimulates a greater rate of growth than
control (FSH, P < 0.0001; DHT, P
< 0.002). The rate of growth in FSH alone is significantly greater than
that in DHT alone (P < 0.0004). Values are means and
SEM, and lines are regression slopes. Slopes were compared using linear
regression. Numbers in parentheses are numbers of follicles. (c) Follicles
cultured in the presence of DHT and increasing doses of FSH showed significant
growth enhancement in the presence of 1 ng/mL and 10 ng/mL FSH, but not in the
lowest dose of FSH (0.1 ng/mL). Statistical comparisons as in a. (d) Change in
expression of Fshr and Star in four samples
of five follicles, each cultured for 24 hours in the presence of DHT alone, FSH
alone, or DHT and FSH in combination. Data have been log2
transformed, and treatments were compared with control (0) and between
treatments using an unpaired t test. Fold change indicated in
right-hand y axis. Asterisks by error bars indicate a significant difference in
expression from control; differences between treatments are indicated by
asterisks on horizontal lines. P values as in a. Values are
mean and SEM.Overall, the rate of growth of follicles in the presence of both DHT and FSH was
significantly greater than that in either treatment alone. Furthermore, follicles in
treatments alone or in combination grew at a significantly faster rate than control
follicles [Fig. 6(b)]. The dose of FSH used here
was the lowest dose that elicited a maximal response in a previous study (26). We were interested to explore whether the
presence of DHT would allow a lower dose of FSH to stimulate the same maximal
response. This was not the case; lower doses of FSH resulted in minimal growth [Fig. 6(c)].
Effects of androgens and FSH on gene expression
FSH receptor, steroid synthesis, and action
FSH receptor (Fshr) expression was significantly increased in
follicles cultured in DHT compared with vehicle-treated controls after 24 hours in
culture, whereas FSH treatment reduced expression of Fshr. This
effect was partially reversed during cotreatment with DHT [Fig. 6(d)]. DHT alone had a small and insignificant effect on
expression of Star but further enhanced FSH-stimulated
Star expression.We examined the time course of gene expression of androgen receptor
(Ar), Fshr, Star,
Cyp11a1, Cyp17, and Cyp19
during 72 hours of culture in presence of DHT (Fig.
7). AR expression was consistently suppressed by DHT, whereas that of
Fshr was increased at each time point. Expression of
Star was significantly up-regulated after 72 hours in culture,
whereas that of Cyp11a1 was significantly reduced after 48 hours
in culture and further reduced at 72 hours (Fig.
7). Cyp19 expression was undetectable, as was that of
Cyp17.
Figure 7.
Time course of hormone receptor and steroidogenic enzyme gene expression in
isolated follicles during 72 hours of culture in the presence of DHT. Change
in expression of Ar, Fshr1,
Star, and Cyp11a1 in four to six
samples of five follicles, each cultured for 24, 48, and 72 hours in the
presence of 10 nM DHT. Data have been log2 transformed, and DHT
treatment was compared with time-matched control samples (0) and between
time points using an unpaired t test. Fold change is
indicated in right-hand y axis. Asterisks by error bars indicate significant
difference in expression from control, and differences between time points
are indicated by asterisks on horizontal lines. *P
< 0.05, **P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 00001. Values
are mean and SEM.
Time course of hormone receptor and steroidogenic enzyme gene expression in
isolated follicles during 72 hours of culture in the presence of DHT. Change
in expression of Ar, Fshr1,
Star, and Cyp11a1 in four to six
samples of five follicles, each cultured for 24, 48, and 72 hours in the
presence of 10 nM DHT. Data have been log2 transformed, and DHT
treatment was compared with time-matched control samples (0) and between
time points using an unpaired t test. Fold change is
indicated in right-hand y axis. Asterisks by error bars indicate significant
difference in expression from control, and differences between time points
are indicated by asterisks on horizontal lines. *P
< 0.05, **P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 00001. Values
are mean and SEM.
Effect of DHT and testosterone on TGFβ ligands and
receptors
In this series of studies, we examined the effects of either DHT or testosterone
on gene expression after 24 hours in culture (Fig.
8). Expression of Ar was reduced and that of
Fshr increased by DHT, as shown previously; similar changes
were seen in response to testosterone.
Figure 8.
Effect of DHT (a) and testosterone (b) on gene expression of hormone
receptors and members of the TGFβ superfamily
(ligands and receptors). Isolated follicles were cultured in the presence
and absence of DHT or testosterone for 24 hours. Data have been
log2 transformed, and DHT or testosterone treatment was
compared with control samples (0) using an unpaired t test.
Fold change is indicated on right-hand y axis. Asterisks by error bars
indicate significant difference in expression from control.
*P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001. Values are
mean and SEM.
Effect of DHT (a) and testosterone (b) on gene expression of hormone
receptors and members of the TGFβ superfamily
(ligands and receptors). Isolated follicles were cultured in the presence
and absence of DHT or testosterone for 24 hours. Data have been
log2 transformed, and DHT or testosterone treatment was
compared with control samples (0) using an unpaired t test.
Fold change is indicated on right-hand y axis. Asterisks by error bars
indicate significant difference in expression from control.
*P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001. Values are
mean and SEM.We observed a significant interaction of androgens with ligands and receptors of
the TGFβ superfamily in these studies (Fig. 8). Exposure to androgens during culture
resulted in reduction of expression of Amh and
Bmp15 by both DHT and testosterone. A similar trend was
observed for Gdf9, but the change was not significant in response
to DHT. Testosterone, but not DHT, reduced expression of Amhr2,
and both androgens reduced Bmpr2 expression. Expression of the
type 1 receptors Alk3, Alk4, and
Alk5 were similarly reduced by both androgens, but, again,
only the actions of testosterone were significant. However, both DHT and
testosterone stimulated expression of Alk6. All androgen-induced
changes in gene expression were negated by coincubation with flutamide (data not
shown).To explore the functional significance of androgen-induced changes in gene
expression of TGFβ ligands and their receptors, we
examined the effects of the Alk2/3/6 inhibitor DSM (24) [Fig. 9(a)] on
follicle growth and gene expression in the presence and absence of DHT. As shown
in our previous study (23), DSM alone
stimulated follicle growth at 24 hours (P < 0.05), but
here we show that the response to DHT was significantly enhanced by the addition
of DSM [Fig. 9(b)]. DSM did not, however,
influence DHT-dependent antrum formation.
Figure 9.
Effect of DSM (an inhibitor of Alk2, 3, and 6) on DHT-stimulated follicle
growth in vitro for 72 hours. (a)
TGFβ receptor inhibition by DSM. (b) Isolated
follicle growth in the presence and absence of DHT and/or DSM. Relative area
of follicles in different treatments was compared at each time point using
one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
*P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 00001. Values
are mean and 95% confidence interval. Numbers in parentheses are numbers of
follicles. (c–f) Effect of DHT alone, DSM alone, and DHT in
combination with DSM on gene expression following 72 hours of culture. Data
have been log2 transformed, and DHT, DSM, or DHT plus DSM
treatment was compared with control samples (0) using an unpaired
t test. Fold change is indicated in right-hand y axis.
Asterisks by error bars indicate significant difference in expression from
control, and differences between treatments are indicated by asterisks on
horizontal lines. *P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 00001. Values
are mean and SEM. (c) TGFβ ligands. (d) Hormone
receptors. (e) TGFβ receptors. (f) Steroidogenic
enzymes.
Effect of DSM (an inhibitor of Alk2, 3, and 6) on DHT-stimulated follicle
growth in vitro for 72 hours. (a)
TGFβ receptor inhibition by DSM. (b) Isolated
follicle growth in the presence and absence of DHT and/or DSM. Relative area
of follicles in different treatments was compared at each time point using
one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
*P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 00001. Values
are mean and 95% confidence interval. Numbers in parentheses are numbers of
follicles. (c–f) Effect of DHT alone, DSM alone, and DHT in
combination with DSM on gene expression following 72 hours of culture. Data
have been log2 transformed, and DHT, DSM, or DHT plus DSM
treatment was compared with control samples (0) using an unpaired
t test. Fold change is indicated in right-hand y axis.
Asterisks by error bars indicate significant difference in expression from
control, and differences between treatments are indicated by asterisks on
horizontal lines. *P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01,
***P < 0.001,
****P < 00001. Values
are mean and SEM. (c) TGFβ ligands. (d) Hormone
receptors. (e) TGFβ receptors. (f) Steroidogenic
enzymes.DSM alone resulted in reduction in expression of Amh after 72
hours in culture but with no significant effect on Gdf9 [Fig. 9(c)]. However, DSM further enhanced the
inhibitory effect of DHT on Amh without influencing DHT-induced
Gdf9 expression. Neither DSM alone nor DSM with DHT had an
effect on expression of Bmp15. DSM alone had no effect on
Amhr2 but led to increased expression of Alk5
and, as anticipated, reduction in Alk6 [Fig. 9(e)]. The addition of DHT resulted in greater production
of Amhr2 than either DSM or DHT alone and reversed the effects of
DSM on Alk5 and Alk6 [Fig. 9(e)].There was no significant effect of DSM alone on Ar or
Fshr, and DSM did not affect the response to DHT [Fig. 9(d)]. However, DSM alone enhanced
expression of Star and further increased DHT-stimulated
expression [Fig. 9(f)]. Interestingly, DSM
alone led to an increase in Cyp11a1 and reversed the inhibitory
response to DHT [Fig. 9(f)].
Discussion
The purpose of these studies was to examine the role of androgens in preantral follicle
development to provide insight into the mechanism of aberrant early follicle development
in human PCOS. Exposure to excess androgen has been postulated to underpin the probable
developmental origin of PCOS and its adult manifestations of reproductive and metabolic
dysfunction (14, 27, 28). Using a mouse
model of preantral follicle development that has been well validated in our laboratory,
we have shown that exposure to both DHT and testosterone have a plethora of effects on
both follicle growth and gene expression of key molecules implicated in follicle
function. As shown in previous studies of cultured isolated follicles from mouse ovary
(1, 9), androgens stimulate follicle growth.
This effect is mirrored in studies of prentral follicle development in the primate ovary
following in vivo androgen treatment (29, 30). In addition to the increase of follicle diameter in
response to androgens, our results show a significant increase in expression of the
proliferation marker Ki67, whereas the expression of proapoptotic markers TUNEL and
caspase was no different between treated and untreated follicles. Furthermore, there was
a 10-fold increase of antrum formation, an index of accelerated growth, in the presence
of DHT. Thus, although androgens have been shown to have proapoptotic effects in GCs of
large antral follicles (10, 11), the
predominant action of testosterone and DHT in preantral follicles appears to be
stimulation of GC proliferation and net follicle growth.In sections of juvenile mouse ovary, we found that AR was expressed in the cytoplasm of
oocytes, GCs, and theca at all preantral stages, including primordial follicles. DHT
treatment increased the overall expression of AR in cultured follicles and, importantly,
increased nuclear localization of AR, as would be expected in relation to
androgen-induced growth and differentiation. Increased expression of AR protein was
interesting and paradoxical, as we have also demonstrated here that Ar
messenger RNA is decreased by DHT treatment during culture.With the exception of the specific experiment exploring the effect of DHT in the
presence of FSH, all the follicles in this study were cultured without FSH. Use of the
database allowed examination of the response of follicles of increasing size to DHT
alone. Small follicles less than 130 µm in diameter grew more in the presence of
DHT. This is in contrast to our observations of the effects of FSH on preantral follicle
growth in culture, in that responsiveness to added FSH was greatest in follicles larger
than 130 µm in diameter (26), leading us
to conclude that follicles larger than 130 µm in diameter had a greater
requirement for FSH. It may be that the lack of response to DHT in larger follicles in
the current study is due to the need for FSH to grow in vitro.An important observation is the positive interaction with FSH in terms of both follicle
growth and gene expression. Both FSH, as previously shown (26), and DHT, independently, stimulated growth of preantral
follicles in culture, but FSH increased the responsiveness to DHT in a dose-dependent
manner. After 72 hours in culture, the optimum dose of FSH induced a 30% increase in
follicle growth above that of DHT alone. The amplifying effect of androgens on
FSH-stimulated steroidogenesis was described more than 20 years ago by Wang and
Greenwald (4), and recently Sen and colleagues
have shown that DHT has both antiapoptotic and proproliferative effects, the latter
being mediated, at least in part, by increased FSH receptor expression (31). Here we confirm the effects of DHT on FSH
receptor gene expression and, in addition, show that testosterone has a similar effect.
It is not clear whether the increase in the expression of Fshr is due
to increased expression per cell or to the increased number of cells in follicles
cultured in the presence of androgens (or indeed both). The action of both androgens was
reversed by the AR antagonist flutamide, indicating that the effect of testosterone was
not likely to be attributable to its possible conversion to estradiol. The most
significant effect of androgens on the steroidogenic pathway was an increase in
expression of Star, which, of course, has a key role in making
cholesterol available for steroid synthesis. Both DHT and FSH independently and
interactively increased Star expression. Conversely, expression of
Cyp11a1 was suppressed by exposure to androgens, but these findings
are in accord with observations in studies of the ovaries of day 90 fetal sheep whose
mothers were treated with testosterone (18)Very little has been reported to date on the interaction of androgens and the
TGFβ family of growth factors. There are isolated reports
that TGFβ1 inhibits androgen production by theca cells (32, 33), but, as far as we are aware, there have
been no systematic studies of the effects of androgens on TGFβ
signaling. Our group has previously reported on expression and action of
TGFβ growth factors in isolated mouse preantral follicles
(22, 23), and in the current study, we
examined the interaction of androgen with TGFβ ligands and their
receptors. The most significant findings were inhibition by androgens of
Amh and Bmp15 expression. AMH has a well-described
inhibitory action of preantral follicle growth (34), and BMP15 has a biphasic effect, initially stimulating growth but then
leading to reduced growth rate and apoptosis in mouse preantral follicles after 48 hours
in culture (23). In our studies, AMH expression
was progressively reduced with time of exposure to androgens. Studies in sheep support
this observation, as AMH protein expression is lower in large preantral follicles in 10-
and 21-month-old prenatally testosterone-treated ewes compared with untreated controls
(35). AMH and BMP15 activate receptor
heterodimers that comprise the type 2 receptors AMHR2 and BMPR2, respectively, and the
type1 receptor Alk6 that is used by both ligands. Androgen-stimulated follicle growth is
accompanied by reduced expression not only of Amh and
Bmp15, but also of Amhr2 and
Bmpr2. In addition, DSM, an inhibitor of Alk2/3/6, amplified
DHT-stimulated follicle growth and further reduced expression of Amh.
Taken together, these findings support the view that attenuation of the inhibitory
effects of AMH and BMP15 play a role in the mechanism of androgen stimulation of
preantral follicle development. There were also significant effects of DSM on the
steroidogenic pathway in that, along with enhanced follicle growth, DSM amplified
expression of key molecules involved early in the ovarian steroidogenic pathway
(Star and Cyp11a) and modified the effects of DHT.
This suggests a functional cross-talk between the TGFβ system
and the classic steroidogenic pathways. DSM has previously been described as an
inhibitor of adenosine 5′-monophosphate kinase, but although we cannot rule out
the possibility that this mechanism may play a part in the observed effects on follicle
growth, its high selectivity for the BMP signaling pathway (24) makes the latter a more plausible target.In addressing the issue of cross-talk between these pathways, one of the key findings in
the current study was that, at 24 hours in culture, DHT treatment resulted in decreased
expression of the oocyte-specific gene Bmp15 (as well as decreased
expression of Amh and Amhr2). These changes were
accompanied by increased expression of Star and down-regulation of
Cyp11a. In this context, it is striking that direct treatment of
human granulosa lutein cells and ovine GCs with rhBMP15 results in opposite effects:
increased AMH, AMHR2, and CYP11A and
decreased STAR (19, 36,
37). This strongly suggests that BMP15 is a major regulator of both the
rate-limiting steps of steroidogenesis and of AMH and its receptor and furthermore that
DHT is having indirect actions on these genes via the consequent decreased levels of
this oocyte-derived growth factor. Indeed, the important role of the oocyte in
stimulating AMH expression was first proposed in 2004 in elegant studies using
cocultures of isolated oocytes and preantral GCs from mice (38). The presence of one or more oocytes in the immediate vicinity
of GCs increased AMH expression more than twofold. Furthermore, studies in our
laboratory comparing AMH expression in intact preantral follicles and follicles lacking
an oocyte have shown that the absence of an oocyte results in almost complete loss of
AMH expression after 24 hours of culture (Mora and Fenwick, unpublished data). Thus, the
effect of DHT (or testosterone) on follicle growth appears to involve a complex
interaction with both FSH and the intraovarian TGFβ system
(Fig. 10). These androgens have a direct
stimulatory effect on growth and also increase FSH responsiveness by up-regulation of
FSH receptor expression. In addition, DHT and testosterone reduce expression of AMH both
directly and by inhibition of the oocyte-derived TGFβ growth
factor BMP15. BMP15 has been shown to stimulate AMH production by GCs (and reduce
expression of the growth-promoting GDF9 by the oocyte), hence reduction of BMP15 levels
will contribute to reduced AMH levels. The net effect of androgens is therefore to
contribute to GC proliferation by reversing the action of inhibitory
TGFβ growth factors that are produced by the oocyte and
surrounding GCs. The current study has examined gene expression of these key ovarian
factors, and it should, of course, be acknowledged that the changes observed do not
necessarily imply similar effects on protein expression (as illustrated in this study
with regard to AR gene and protein expression). Nevertheless, where we see evidence of
functional changes (e.g., androgen-dependent amplification of both
Fshr gene expression in parallel with increased follicle growth
rate), the association between gene and protein expression can easily be implied.
Figure 10.
Putative pathways of androgen action on preantral follicle growth. Testosterone
(T) or DHT act via the AR, causing a measurable increase in GC proliferation. This
may be mediated directly, or indirectly, by increased FSHR (stimulating GC
proliferation) or decreased AMH (reducing AMH inhibition). AMH can be further
reduced by androgen-induced reduction of oocyte-specific BMP, which normally
stimulates AMH levels. Inset box summarizes androgen-induced inhibition of
TGFβ ligands and type I and II
TGFβ receptors, with the exception of
Alk6.
Putative pathways of androgen action on preantral follicle growth. Testosterone
(T) or DHT act via the AR, causing a measurable increase in GC proliferation. This
may be mediated directly, or indirectly, by increased FSHR (stimulating GC
proliferation) or decreased AMH (reducing AMH inhibition). AMH can be further
reduced by androgen-induced reduction of oocyte-specific BMP, which normally
stimulates AMH levels. Inset box summarizes androgen-induced inhibition of
TGFβ ligands and type I and II
TGFβ receptors, with the exception of
Alk6.An intriguing effect of DHT on preantral follicle development was the precocious
formation of an antrum, a feature that has also been reported in studies of PA sheep
(39). Initially it was thought to be due to
the stimulatory effects of DHT on follicle growth, with the expectation that antra would
be present in the largest follicles. However, we found that there was no difference in
the diameter of follicles with and without antra, suggesting that their appearance was
due to effects of androgen on the expression of key genes, rather than achievement of a
threshold diameter. Aquaporins facilitate water transport and are expressed in GCs
(40), and testosterone stimulated the swelling
of porcine GCs in hypotonic culture medium, an effect that was reversed by flutamide,
suggesting that aquaporins are sensitive to androgen (41). A recent study by the same group confirmed that follicles from pigs that
were exposed to flutamide in utero expressed less Aqp5
messenger RNA and protein, demonstrating that androgen could potentially stimulate
aquaporin expression leading to antrum formation (42).Aberrant ovarian function associated with PCOS and hyperandrogenism has been well
documented, and it has been suggested that “programming” of ovarian
function by androgens plays a key part (27). This
notion is supported by the results of studies of both rodent and large animal (sheep and
monkey) models of PCOS that involve in vivo exposure to excess androgen
(7, 19, 28, 43). Here, in an
ex vivo model, we have examined the direct effects of androgens on
follicle growth and gene expression and have uncovered pathways that are relevant to the
abnormalities of follicle development that are characteristic of PCOS (14). The enhancement of FSH-activated follicle
growth may well have a bearing not only on the accelerated growth of preantral
follicles, but also on the precocious responsiveness to luteinizing hormone that has
been observed in small antral follicles in ovaries of women with PCOS (14, 44). Intriguingly, androgen action also
implicates the participation of key members of the TGFβ
superfamily and its receptors, and there is little doubt that these growth factors have
a fundamental role in activation and maintenance of early follicle development.
Authors: Mark A Fenwick; Jocelyn M Mora; Yosef T Mansour; Christina Baithun; Stephen Franks; Kate Hardy Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Lisa Ann Owens; Stine Gry Kristensen; Avi Lerner; Georgios Christopoulos; Stuart Lavery; Aylin C Hanyaloglu; Kate Hardy; Claus Yding Andersen; Stephen Franks Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 5.958