| Literature DB >> 28323876 |
Nan Liu1, Bingyan J Wang1, Kathleen M Broughton1, Roberto Alvarez1, Sailay Siddiqi1, Rebeca Loaiza1, Nicky Nguyen1, Pearl Quijada1, Natalie Gude1, Mark A Sussman1.
Abstract
PIM1, a pro-survival gene encoding a serine/ threonine kinase, influences cell proliferation and survival. Modification of cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) or cardiomyocytes with PIM1 using a lentivirus-based delivery method showed long-term improved cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI). However, lentivirus based delivery methods have stringent FDA regulation with respect to clinical trials. To provide an alternative and low risk PIM1 delivery method, this study examined the use of a non-viral modified plasmid-minicircle (MC) as a vehicle to deliver PIM1 into mouse CPCs (mCPCs) in vitro and the myocardium in vivo. MC containing a turbo gfp reporter gene (gfp-MC) was used as a transfection and injection control. PIM1 was subcloned into gfp-MC (PIM1-MC) and then transfected into mCPCs at an efficiency of 29.4±3.7%. PIM1-MC engineered mCPCs (PIM1-mCPCs) exhibit significantly (P<0.05) better survival rate under oxidative treatment. PIM1-mCPCs also exhibit 1.9±0.1 and 2.2±0.2 fold higher cell proliferation at 3 and 5 days post plating, respectively, as compared to gfp-MC transfected mCPCs control. PIM1-MC was injected directly into ten-week old adult FVB female mice hearts in the border zone immediately after MI. Delivery of PIM1 into myocardium was confirmed by GFP+ cardiomyocytes. Mice with PIM1-MC injection showed increased protection compared to gfp-MC injection groups measured by ejection fraction at 3 and 7 days post injury (P = 0.0379 and P = 0.0262 by t-test, respectively). Success of PIM1 delivery and integration into mCPCs in vitro and cardiomyocytes in vivo by MC highlights the possibility of a non-cell based therapeutic approach for treatment of ischemic heart disease and MI.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28323876 PMCID: PMC5360264 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173963
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Characterization of PIM1-mCPCs.
A: Gfp-MC and PIM1-MC parental plasmids (PP) structures. B: Electrophoresis of PP and MC after EcoRI enzyme digestion. C: Percentage of GFP+ mCPCs after MC transfection as measured by FACS. D: PIM1 overexpression in PIM1-mCPC lysate measured by immunoblotting. E: Quantification of cell survival assays. F: Representative cell survival assay by FACS analysis. G: Proliferation rate by CyQuant assay. H: Doubling time by CyQuant assay. NT (no treatment). All error bars are SEM; n = 3 (E and G). *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 vsgfp-mCPCs group by one-way ANOVA.
Fig 2Successful delivery and integration of MC in vivo.
Representative confocal images of border zone GFP+ cells in heart section after MC injection at 3 dpi by immunohistochemistry. Green: GFP; white: DAPI; blue: MyL2. Scale bar is 100 μm.
Fig 3PIM1-MC has a moderate cardioprotection short-term after myocardial infarction.
A: Longitudinal assessment of EF (%) up to 28 days. B: EF (%) of gfp-MC and PIM1-MC groups at 3dpi and 7dapi. C: Longitudinal assessment of FS (%) up to 28 days. D: Longitudinal assessment of LVAWs up to 28 days. Sample sizes of 5–8 mice per group. ns (not significant), *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 vs. gfp-MC control group. A, C and D by one-way ANOVA. B by student t-test.