Carolyn Bolton Moore1, Edmund V Capparelli, Pearl Samson, Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi, Patrick Jean-Philippe, Carol Worrell, Barbara Heckman, Lynette Purdue, Stephen A Spector, Alex Benns, William Borkowsky, Amy Loftis, Elizabeth Hawkins, Carole Wallis, Ellen G Chadwick. 1. aCentre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia bUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama cUniversity of California San Diego, La Jolla dRady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California eHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA fUniversity of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe gNational Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases hEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland iFrontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Amherst jNew York University's School of Medicine, New York, New York kUNC Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina lSocial and Scientific Systems Inc, Silver Springs, Maryland, USA mBARC-SA and Lancet Laboratories, Johannesburg, South Africa nNorthwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine safety-specific, efficacy-specific and genotypic-specific dose requirements of efavirenz (EFV) in children aged 3 to less than 36 months with HIV infection. DESIGN: IMPAACT P1070 was a 24-week prospective cohort trial of EFV (as open capsules) and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children with HIV infection 3 to less than 36 months without tuberculosis (Cohort 1). METHODS: CYP2B6 G516T genotype was determined, and intensive pharmacokinetics was performed at week 2. EFV dose was adjusted if outside the target area under the curve (AUC) 35-180 μg*h/ml. Pharmacokinetic and CYP2B6 G516T genotype data were used to model EFV exposures based on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved doses. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants, median age 19 months, initiated the study regimen with 24 weeks median follow-up; 38 516GG/GT and 9 516TT genotypes. Initially, median EFV AUC was higher in 516TT vs. 516GG/GT (median 490 vs. 107 μg*h/ml; P = 0.0001) with all 516TT above AUC target. Following an amendment that reduced the 516TT EFV dose by 75%, pharmacokinetic modeling predicted that 83% of participants met the AUC target (31/38 516GG/GT, 8/9 516TT). In contrast, modeling using P1070 data predicted that FDA-approved doses would produce subtherapeutic AUCs in almost one-third of participants with 516GG/GT and excessive AUCs in more than 50% with 516TT genotypes. CONCLUSION: CYP2B6 G516T genotype strongly influences EFV exposures in this age group. Genotype-directed dosing yields therapeutic EFV concentrations and appears to outperform other dosing approaches.
OBJECTIVES: To determine safety-specific, efficacy-specific and genotypic-specific dose requirements of efavirenz (EFV) in children aged 3 to less than 36 months with HIV infection. DESIGN: IMPAACT P1070 was a 24-week prospective cohort trial of EFV (as open capsules) and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children with HIV infection 3 to less than 36 months without tuberculosis (Cohort 1). METHODS:CYP2B6 G516T genotype was determined, and intensive pharmacokinetics was performed at week 2. EFV dose was adjusted if outside the target area under the curve (AUC) 35-180 μg*h/ml. Pharmacokinetic and CYP2B6 G516T genotype data were used to model EFV exposures based on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved doses. RESULTS: Forty-seven participants, median age 19 months, initiated the study regimen with 24 weeks median follow-up; 38 516GG/GT and 9 516TT genotypes. Initially, median EFV AUC was higher in 516TT vs. 516GG/GT (median 490 vs. 107 μg*h/ml; P = 0.0001) with all 516TT above AUC target. Following an amendment that reduced the 516TT EFV dose by 75%, pharmacokinetic modeling predicted that 83% of participants met the AUC target (31/38 516GG/GT, 8/9 516TT). In contrast, modeling using P1070 data predicted that FDA-approved doses would produce subtherapeutic AUCs in almost one-third of participants with 516GG/GT and excessive AUCs in more than 50% with 516TT genotypes. CONCLUSION:CYP2B6 G516T genotype strongly influences EFV exposures in this age group. Genotype-directed dosing yields therapeutic EFV concentrations and appears to outperform other dosing approaches.
Authors: Bryan A Ward; J Christopher Gorski; David R Jones; Stephen D Hall; David A Flockhart; Zeruesenay Desta Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2003-04-03 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Yuan Ren; James J C Nuttall; Claire Egbers; Brian S Eley; Tammy M Meyers; Peter J Smith; Gary Maartens; Helen M McIlleron Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2007-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Quirine Fillekes; Eva Natukunda; Jackie Balungi; Lindsay Kendall; Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi; Rosette Keishanyu; Alex Ferrier; Joseph Lutakome; Diana M Gibb; David M Burger; A Sarah Walker Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: U Wintergerst; F Hoffmann; A Jansson; G Notheis; K Huss; M Kurowski; D Burger Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2008-03-13 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Rob ter Heine; Henriette J Scherpbier; Kristel M L Crommentuyn; Vincent Bekker; Jos H Beijnen; Taco W Kuijpers; Alwin D R Huitema Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2008
Authors: Ross E McKinney; John Rodman; Chengcheng Hu; Paula Britto; Michael Hughes; Mary Elizabeth Smith; Leslie K Serchuck; Joyce Kraimer; Alberto A Ortiz; Patricia Flynn; Ram Yogev; Stephen Spector; Linda Draper; Paul Tran; Melissa Scites; Ruth Dickover; Adriana Weinberg; Coleen Cunningham; Elaine Abrams; M Robert Blum; Gregory E Chittick; Laurie Reynolds; Mobeen Rathore Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2007-07-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Richard C Brundage; Florence H Yong; Terence Fenton; Stephen A Spector; Stuart E Starr; Courtney V Fletcher Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Nikki Higa; Amy Pelz; Donald Birch; Ingrid A Beck; Tatiana Sils; Pearl Samson; Mutsawashe Bwakura-Dangarembizi; Carolyn Bolton-Moore; Edmund Capparelli; Ellen Chadwick; Lisa M Frenkel Journal: J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Mutsa Bwakura Dangarembizi; Pearl Samson; Edmund V Capparelli; Carolyn Bolton Moore; Patrick Jean-Philippe; Stephen A Spector; Nahida Chakhtoura; Alex Benns; Bonnie Zimmer; Lynette Purdue; Chivon Jackson; Carole Wallis; Jennifer L Libous; Ellen G Chadwick Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Zeruesenay Desta; Roseann S Gammal; Li Gong; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; Aditya H Gaur; Chonlaphat Sukasem; Jennifer Hockings; Alan Myers; Marelize Swart; Rachel F Tyndale; Collen Masimirembwa; Otito F Iwuchukwu; Sanika Chirwa; Jeffrey Lennox; Andrea Gaedigk; Teri E Klein; David W Haas Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Mina Nikanjam; Lana Tran; Ellen G Chadwick; Mutsa Bwakura-Dangarembizi; Carolyn Bolton Moore; Pearl Samson; Stephen A Spector; Nahida Chakhtoura; Patrick Jean-Philippe; Lisa Frenkel; Bonnie Zimmer; Alex Benns; Jennifer Libous; Edmund V Capparelli Journal: AIDS Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 4.632
Authors: Hylke Waalewijn; Anna Turkova; Natella Rakhmanina; Tim R Cressey; Martina Penazzato; Angela Colbers; David M Burger Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Sandra Soeria-Atmadja; Emma Österberg; Lars L Gustafsson; Marja-Liisa Dahl; Jaran Eriksen; Johanna Rubin; Lars Navér Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 3.240