Literature DB >> 28323708

Fenestrated Screws Augmented With PMMA Increase the Pullout Strength of Sacral Pedicle Screws.

Matthew Colman1, Jonathan Pond, Kent Bachus, Brandon D Lawrence, William R Spiker, Darrel S Brodke.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Biomechanics.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the fixation in osteoporotic specimens of a bicortical sacral pedicle screw to the following constructs: a unicortical solid screw augmented with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) (TRACT), a unicortical fenestrated screw augmented with PMMA (FEN), and a bicortical screw/sacral alar screw combination (PED/ALA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Rigid posterior sacral fixation of osteoporotic spines is problematic due to poor bone quality. Options to improve fixation include bicortical or tricortical screw trajectory, addition of S2 alar screws, or PMMA augmentation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven osteoporotic cadaveric sacra were potted in 2-part filler compound. As a baseline fixation method, a 6.5-mm bicortical pedicle screw was placed into 1 pedicle of each sacra. The contralateral side was randomly assigned to receive a unicortical fenestrated 6.5-mm pedicle screw augmented with PMMA, a unicortical solid 6.5-mm pedicle screw augmented with PMMA, or a bicortical pedicle screw/alar screw construct. Pedicle screws were failed in cantilever pullout using a materials testing machine. Data were normalized into a test index by taking the ratio of the test screw pullout strength to the intraspecimen bicortical control screw pullout strength.
RESULTS: The fixation strengths as expressed by the test index of the TRACT, FEN, and PED/ALA groups were 101%, 157%, and 167%, respectively. Although there was no statistical difference detected between the FEN and PED/ALA groups, the TRACT group had a trend toward lower pullout strength than the FEN (P=0.06) or PED/ALA (0.06) groups. Although underpowered, this study did not detect biomechanical inferiority for any of the 3 test configurations when compared with standard bicortical S1 screws.
CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that the fixation strength of a fenestrated, PMMA-augmented construct or a combined S1 pedicle/S2 alar screw construct may be better than either standard bicortical or unicortical PMMA screw-tract augmented screws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28323708     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  5 in total

1.  Prediction of Sacral Screw Loosening after Lumbosacral Surgeries Involving Rigid Fixation of Sacral Bone Using Preoperative Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Aikeremujiang Muheremu; Maihemuti Yakufu; Junyao Jiang; Muradil Mardan; Lei Li; Rui Zhang; Abudunaibi Aili; Zhaohui Luo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  A novel injectable calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite for the augmentation of cannulated pedicle-screw fixation.

Authors:  Haolin Sun; Chun Liu; Huiling Liu; Yanjie Bai; Zheng Zhang; Xuwen Li; Chunde Li; Huilin Yang; Lei Yang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-04-27

3.  Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model.

Authors:  Gorkem Kiyak; Tevfik Balikci; Ahmed Majid Heydar; Murat Bezer
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07

4.  The methods for inserting lumbar bicortical pedicle screws from the anatomical perspective of the prevertebral great vessels.

Authors:  Liehua Liu; Haoming Wang; Jiangang Wang; Qian Wang; Shiming Cheng; Ying Li; Weidong Jin; Zili Wang; Qiang Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  The Biomechanical Properties of Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws for Osteoporotic Spines.

Authors:  Yuetian Wang; Lei Yang; Chunde Li; Haolin Sun
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-02-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.