Adrian J Bravo1, Mark A Prince2, Matthew R Pearson1. 1. a Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, & Addictions , University of New Mexico , Albuquerque , New Mexico , USA. 2. b Department of Psychology , Colorado State University , Fort Collins , Colorado , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: College-related alcohol beliefs, or beliefs that drinking alcohol is central to the college experience, have been shown to robustly predict alcohol-related outcomes among college students. Given the strength of these associations, it is imperative to understand more proximal factors (i.e., closer in a causal chain leading to alcohol-related outcomes) that can explain these associations. OBJECTIVES: The current research examined alcohol protective behavioral strategies (PBS) as a potential mediator of the association between college-related alcohol beliefs and alcohol outcomes among college student drinkers. METHOD: Participants were undergraduate students from a large southeastern university (Sample 1; n = 561) and a large southwestern university (Sample 2; n = 563) in the United States that consumed alcohol at least once in the previous month. RESULTS: Path analysis was conducted examining the concurrent associations between college-related alcohol beliefs, PBS use (both as a single facet and multidimensionally), alcohol consumption, and alcohol-related consequences (i.e., double mediation). In both samples, there was a significant double-mediated association that suggested that higher college-related alcohol beliefs is associated with lower PBS use (single facet), which is associated with higher alcohol consumption and alcohol-related consequences. Multidimensionally, only one double-mediation effect (in Sample 2 only) was significant (i.e., college-related alcohol beliefs → manner of drinking PBS → alcohol consumption → alcohol-related consequences). Conclusions/Importance: These results suggest that targeting these college-related alcohol beliefs as well as PBS use are promising targets for college alcohol interventions. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
BACKGROUND: College-related alcohol beliefs, or beliefs that drinking alcohol is central to the college experience, have been shown to robustly predict alcohol-related outcomes among college students. Given the strength of these associations, it is imperative to understand more proximal factors (i.e., closer in a causal chain leading to alcohol-related outcomes) that can explain these associations. OBJECTIVES: The current research examined alcohol protective behavioral strategies (PBS) as a potential mediator of the association between college-related alcohol beliefs and alcohol outcomes among college student drinkers. METHOD:Participants were undergraduate students from a large southeastern university (Sample 1; n = 561) and a large southwestern university (Sample 2; n = 563) in the United States that consumed alcohol at least once in the previous month. RESULTS: Path analysis was conducted examining the concurrent associations between college-related alcohol beliefs, PBS use (both as a single facet and multidimensionally), alcohol consumption, and alcohol-related consequences (i.e., double mediation). In both samples, there was a significant double-mediated association that suggested that higher college-related alcohol beliefs is associated with lower PBS use (single facet), which is associated with higher alcohol consumption and alcohol-related consequences. Multidimensionally, only one double-mediation effect (in Sample 2 only) was significant (i.e., college-related alcohol beliefs → manner of drinking PBS → alcohol consumption → alcohol-related consequences). Conclusions/Importance: These results suggest that targeting these college-related alcohol beliefs as well as PBS use are promising targets for college alcohol interventions. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Alcohol; college students; college-alcohol beliefs; consequences; protective behavioral strategies
Authors: Matthew P Martens; Michael A Karakashian; Kristie M Fleming; Roneferiti M Fowler; E Suzanne Hatchett; M Dolores Cimini Journal: J Drug Educ Date: 2009
Authors: Mary E Larimer; Christine M Lee; Jason R Kilmer; Patricia M Fabiano; Christopher B Stark; Irene M Geisner; Kimberly A Mallett; Ty W Lostutter; Jessica M Cronce; Maggie Feeney; Clayton Neighbors Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2007-04
Authors: Lauren E Oddo; Michael C Meinzer; Alva Tang; James G Murphy; John M Vasko; Carl W Lejuez; Andrea Chronis-Tuscano Journal: Behav Ther Date: 2021-02-03
Authors: Frank J Schwebel; Andrew P Weinstein; Dylan K Richards; Adrian J Bravo; Matthew R Pearson Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Julio César Vargas-Ramos; Claudia Lerma; Rebeca María Elena Guzmán-Saldaña; Abel Lerma; Lilian Elizabeth Bosques-Brugada; Claudia Margarita González-Fragoso Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kevin S Montes; Margott Dela Cruz; Andrew P Weinstein; Matthew R Pearson; Kristen P Lindgren; Clayton Neighbors Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 3.913