Literature DB >> 28323240

The impact of continuous use of lumbosacral orthoses on trunk motor performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Hiroshi Takasaki1, Takahiro Miki2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) is prescribed by general practitioners for the management of low back pain. It may be speculated that continuous use of an LSO for a prolonged period reduces mechanical loading to the trunk muscle in daily living and results in impairments of the trunk muscle.
PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate whether trunk motor performances are impaired by the continuous use of an LSO. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: This is a systematic review with meta-analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken using PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library from inception to November 2016. Inclusion criteria were (1) the use of an LSO for ≥2 days, (2) the use of a soft LSO designed for musculoskeletal conditions, (3) absence of cointervention except education, and (4) measures of trunk motor performance. The following were excluded: (1) studies with insufficient data and (2) studies with poor methodological quality (<9/16) in the modified McMaster Critical Review Form for Quantitative Studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to determine the quality of evidence.
RESULTS: Data of eight studies were analyzed. The most common measures for motor performances were the maximum strength of the trunk flexors and extensors and the endurance and fatigability of the trunk extensors. In all measures, 95% confidence intervals of the pooled standardized mean difference between the control or preintervention group and the intervention or postintervention group included zero. Further, quality of evidence ranged from low to very low in the GRADE system in all findings of the meta-analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analyses demonstrated no negative effect by the continuous use of an LSO for 1-6 months. However, the quality of evidence ranged from low to very low, and more high-quality trials are required to draw a definitive conclusion on the impact of the continuous use of an LSO on trunk motor performances.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbosacral region; Muscle; Muscle contraction; Muscle fatigue; Orthotic devices; Skeletal; Torso

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28323240     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  6 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation in Advanced Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases and Neural Compromise: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Cho Rong Bae; Ma Nessa Gelvosa; Jae Yong Jeon
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.945

2.  Influence of elastic lumbar support belts on trunk muscle function in patients with non-specific acute lumbar back pain.

Authors:  Christoph Anders; Agnes Hübner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A systematic review of movement and muscular activity biomarkers to discriminate non-specific chronic low back pain patients from an asymptomatic population.

Authors:  Florent Moissenet; Kevin Rose-Dulcina; Stéphane Armand; Stéphane Genevay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Effects of a wearable device and functional wear on spinal alignment and jump performance.

Authors:  Hayato Ikeda; Takayuki Miyamori; Junji Katsuhira; Ryuichi Sawa; Yu Shimasaki; Yuji Takazawa; Masafumi Yoshimura
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.103

5.  An Indication-Based Concept for Stepwise Spinal Orthosis in Low Back Pain According to the Current Literature.

Authors:  Franz Landauer; Klemens Trieb
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Lumbar Roll Usage While Sitting Reduces the Forward Head Posture in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yusuke Handa; Kenya Okada; Hiroshi Takasaki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.