Literature DB >> 28323080

Validation of the Spanish Version of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD-ESP) in a Home-Based Cancer Palliative Care Program and Development of the QODD-ESP-12.

Pedro E Pérez-Cruz1, Oslando Padilla Pérez2, Pilar Bonati3, Oliva Thomsen Parisi4, Laura Tupper Satt5, Marcela Gonzalez Otaiza5, Diego Ceballos Yáñez6, Armando Maldonado Morgado7.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Improving quality of death (QOD) is a key goal in palliative care (PC). To our knowledge, no instruments to measure QOD have been validated in Spanish.
OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were to validate the Spanish version of the quality of dying and death (QODD) questionnaire and to develop and validate a shortened version of this instrument by phone interview.
METHODS: We enrolled caregivers (CGs) of consecutive deceased cancer patients who participated in a single PC clinic. CGs were contacted by phone between 4 and 12 weeks after patients' death and completed the Spanish QODD (QODD-ESP). A question assessing quality of life during last week of life was included. A 12-item QODD (QODD-ESP-12) was developed. Reliability, convergent validity, and construct validity were estimated for both versions.
RESULTS: About 150 (50%) of 302 CGs completed the QODD-ESP. Patient's mean age (SD) was 67 (14); 71 (47%) were females, and 131 (87%) died at home. CGs' mean age (SD) was 51 (13); 128 (85%) were females. Mean QODD-ESP score was 69 (range 35-96). Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.322, not supporting the use of factorial analysis to assess the existence of an underlying construct. Mean QODD-ESP-12 score was 69 (range 31-97). Correlation with last week quality of life was 0.306 (P < 0.01). Confirmatory factorial analysis of QODD-ESP-12 showed that data fitted well Downey's four factors; Chi-square test = 6.32 (degrees of freedom = 60), P = 0.394 comparative fit index = 0.988; Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.987, and root mean square error of approximation = 0.016 (95% CI 0-0.052).
CONCLUSION: QODD-ESP-12 is a reliable and valid instrument with good psychometric properties and can be used to assess QOD in a Spanish-speaking cancer PC population by phone interview.
Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality of death; cancer; home care; palliative care; survey; telephone interview

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28323080     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  10 in total

1.  Dimensions of end-of-life preferences in the Swiss general population aged 55.

Authors:  Carmen Borrat-Besson; Sarah Vilpert; Ralf J Jox; Gian Domenico Borasio; Jürgen Maurer
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 12.782

2.  Evaluation of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire in Kenya.

Authors:  Kenneth Mah; Richard A Powell; Carmine Malfitano; Nancy Gikaara; Lesley Chalklin; Sarah Hales; Anne Rydall; Camilla Zimmermann; Faith N Mwangi-Powell; Gary Rodin
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-06

3.  The quality of dying and death for patients in intensive care units: a single center pilot study.

Authors:  Yanghwan Choi; Myoungrin Park; Da Hyun Kang; Jooseon Lee; Jae Young Moon; Heejoon Ahn
Journal:  Acute Crit Care       Date:  2019-04-08

4.  Translation, Cultural, and Age-Related Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of "Quality of Dying and Death" in Nurses Working in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Mahsa Moslemi; Lida Nikfarid; Manijeh Nourian; Maliheh Nasiri; Ferershteh Rezayi
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2020-01-28

5.  Randomized double-blind controlled trial to assess the efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen associated with strong opioids in the treatment of acute pain in adult cancer patients: study protocol.

Authors:  Ofelia Leiva; Joel Castellano; Luz M Letelier; Luis Rojas; Paola Viviani; Antonio Gonzalez; Pedro Perez-Cruz
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.728

6.  Protocol for the development and multisite validation of the Quality of Dying and Death-Revised Global Version scale.

Authors:  Ekaterina An; Alyssa Tilly; Kenneth Mah; Warren Lewin; Mano Chandrakumar; Arnell Baguio; Nazira Jaffer; Maria Chikasema; Lameck Thambo; Christian Ntizimira; Eve Namisango; Sarah Hales; Camilla Zimmermann; Kayla Wolofsky; Mary Goombs; Gary Rodin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  The Most Important Aspects for a Good Death: Perspectives from Parents of Children with Cancer.

Authors:  Ji Yoon Kim; Bu Kyung Park
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Tools Measuring Quality of Death, Dying, and Care, Completed after Death: Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.

Authors:  Nuriye Kupeli; Bridget Candy; Gabrielle Tamura-Rose; Guy Schofield; Natalie Webber; Stephanie E Hicks; Theodore Floyd; Bella Vivat; Elizabeth L Sampson; Patrick Stone; Trefor Aspden
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Evaluating the efficacy of an Advanced Care Planning Program for Health Decisions in patients with advanced heart failure: protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Beatriz Sánchez; Carlos Guijarro; María Velasco; María Jesús Vicente; Miguel Galán; Benjamín Herreros
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Translation and Cultural Adaptation into Portuguese of the Quality of Dying and Death Scale for Family Members of Patients in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Silmara Meneguin; Cariston Rodrigo Benichel; José Fausto Morais; Cesar de Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.