Literature DB >> 28322914

Computer-aided prediction of extent of motor recovery following constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke.

Sarah Hulbert George1, Mohammad Hossein Rafiei2, Lynne Gauthier3, Alexandra Borstad4, John A Buford5, Hojjat Adeli6.   

Abstract

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CI therapy) is a well-researched intervention for treatment of upper limb function. Overall, CI therapy yields clinically meaningful improvements in speed of task completion and greatly increases use of the more affected upper extremity for daily activities. However, individual improvements vary widely. It has been suggested that intrinsic feedback from somatosensation may influence motor recovery from CI therapy. To test this hypothesis, an enhanced probabilistic neural network (EPNN) prognostic computational model was developed to identify which baseline characteristics predict extent of motor recovery, as measured by the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). Individual characteristics examined were: proprioceptive function via the brief kinesthesia test, tactile sensation via the Semmes-Weinstein touch monofilaments, motor performance captured via the 15 timed items of the Wolf Motor Function Test, stroke affected side. A highly accurate predictive classification was achieved (100% accuracy of EPNN based on available data), but facets of motor functioning alone were sufficient to predict outcome. Somatosensation, as quantified here, did not play a large role in determining the effectiveness of CI therapy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic stroke; Computational neuroscience; Constraint induced movement therapy; Enhanced probabilistic neural networks; Motor function; Somatosensory function

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28322914     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Gross motor ability predicts response to upper extremity rehabilitation in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Sarah Hulbert George; Mohammad Hossein Rafiei; Alexandra Borstad; Hojjat Adeli; Lynne V Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Baseline Predictors of Response to Repetitive Task Practice in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Michael A Dimyan; Stacey Harcum; Elsa Ermer; Amy F Boos; Susan S Conroy; Fang Liu; Linda B Horn; Huichun Xu; Min Zhan; Hegang Chen; Jill Whitall; George F Wittenberg
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.895

Review 3.  Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Silvia Campagnini; Chiara Arienti; Michele Patrini; Piergiuseppe Liuzzi; Andrea Mannini; Maria Chiara Carrozza
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.208

4.  Predicting Improved Daily Use of the More Affected Arm Poststroke Following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy.

Authors:  Mohammad H Rafiei; Kristina M Kelly; Alexandra L Borstad; Hojjat Adeli; Lynne V Gauthier
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-12-16

5.  Do somatosensory deficits predict efficacy of neurorehabilitation using neuromuscular electrical stimulation for moderate to severe motor paralysis of the upper limb in chronic stroke?

Authors:  Keita Tsuzuki; Michiyuki Kawakami; Takuya Nakamura; Osamu Oshima; Nanako Hijikata; Mabu Suda; Yuka Yamada; Kohei Okuyama; Tetsuya Tsuji
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 6.570

6.  Cross-validation of predictive models for functional recovery after post-stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Carrozza; Francesca Cecchi; Silvia Campagnini; Piergiuseppe Liuzzi; Andrea Mannini; Benedetta Basagni; Claudio Macchi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 5.208

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.