Leigh E Charvet1, Michael Shaw1, Ariana Frontario2, Dawn Langdon3, Lauren B Krupp1. 1. Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Medical Center, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA. 2. Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pennsylvania, PA, USA. 3. Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is a common and troubling feature of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS). Brief cognitive assessment in the outpatient setting can identify and longitudinally monitor cognitive involvement so that early intervention is possible. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to measure the sensitivity of two cognitive assessment approaches that are brief, repeatable, and suitable for clinical practice and for multicenter investigation. METHODS: Participants with POMS ( n = 69) were consecutively evaluated as part of outpatient neurologic visits and compared to healthy control participants (HC, n = 66) using the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) approach and timed information processing measures from Cogstate, a computer-based assessment. RESULTS: There was strong agreement in the detection rate of impairment between both assessments, with 26% for the BICAMS and 27% for Cogstate. Two of the Cogstate tasks were the most sensitive individual measures. CONCLUSION: Both the BICAMS and Cogstate timed processing measures offer practical, sensitive, and standardized approaches for cognitive screening assessment in POMS.
BACKGROUND:Cognitive impairment is a common and troubling feature of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS). Brief cognitive assessment in the outpatient setting can identify and longitudinally monitor cognitive involvement so that early intervention is possible. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to measure the sensitivity of two cognitive assessment approaches that are brief, repeatable, and suitable for clinical practice and for multicenter investigation. METHODS:Participants with POMS ( n = 69) were consecutively evaluated as part of outpatient neurologic visits and compared to healthy control participants (HC, n = 66) using the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) approach and timed information processing measures from Cogstate, a computer-based assessment. RESULTS: There was strong agreement in the detection rate of impairment between both assessments, with 26% for the BICAMS and 27% for Cogstate. Two of the Cogstate tasks were the most sensitive individual measures. CONCLUSION: Both the BICAMS and Cogstate timed processing measures offer practical, sensitive, and standardized approaches for cognitive screening assessment in POMS.
Authors: Antonio Giorgio; Jian Zhang; Maria Laura Stromillo; Francesca Rossi; Marco Battaglini; Lucia Nichelli; Marzia Mortilla; Emilio Portaccio; Bahia Hakiki; Maria Pia Amato; Nicola De Stefano Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: L De Meijer; D Merlo; O Skibina; E J Grobbee; J Gale; J Haartsen; P Maruff; D Darby; H Butzkueven; A Van der Walt Journal: Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Date: 2018-12-10
Authors: Curtis M Wojcik; Meghan Beier; Kathleen Costello; John DeLuca; Anthony Feinstein; Yael Goverover; Mark Gudesblatt; Michael Jaworski; Rosalind Kalb; Lori Kostich; Nicholas G LaRocca; Jonathan D Rodgers; Ralph Hb Benedict Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Rosalind Kalb; Meghan Beier; Ralph Hb Benedict; Leigh Charvet; Kathleen Costello; Anthony Feinstein; Jeffrey Gingold; Yael Goverover; June Halper; Colleen Harris; Lori Kostich; Lauren Krupp; Ellen Lathi; Nicholas LaRocca; Ben Thrower; John DeLuca Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 6.312