Literature DB >> 28322321

The clinical effect of nicorandil on perioperative myocardial protection in patients undergoing elective PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ziliang Ye1, Qiang Su1, Lang Li1.   

Abstract

Many scholars have studied the effect of nicorandil on perioperative myocardial protection in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but results are inconsistent. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis. Finally, 16 articles, including 1616 patients, were included into this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis results showed that: (1) Nicorandil can reduce the level of CK-MB after PCI, including at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours. (2) Nicorandil can reduce the level of TnT after PCI, including at 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours and 24 hours. (3) Nicorandil can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions after PCI. (4) Nicorandil cannot reduce the level of MVP after PCI, including at 12 hours and 24 hours. (5) Subgroup analysis showed that nicorandil can reduce CK-MB and TnT level at 24 hours after PCI for Chinese's population (P < 0.05), but can not reduce CK-MB and TnT level at 24 hours after PCI for non Chinese's population (P > 0.05). Our meta-analysis indicate that nicorandil can reduce myocardial injury and reduce the incidence of adverse reaction caused by PCI for Chinese's population, but is not obvious for non Chinese's population. However, this conclusion still needs to be confirmed in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28322321      PMCID: PMC5359672          DOI: 10.1038/srep45117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


In recent years, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)123 has become the principal means of revascularization in patients with coronary heart disease(CHD). According to new research, PCI can obviously improve the myocardial ischemia symptoms and reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients by the revascularization of the ischemic area45. However, some complications will inevitably happen during PCI6. Perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) is one of the common complications to the PCI process, and the incidence rate is approximately 5~30%78. Many research results have indicated that the mechanism of myocardial injury after PCI include vascular endothelial injury, distal microvascular thrombosis, surgical occlusion of the blood vessels, coronary artery spasm, plaque displacement leading to side branch occlusion and reperfusion injury910. Once occurred PMI, the incidence of long-term adverse cardiovascular events will be significantly increased, and result in poor prognosis. Therefore, early identification, prevention and treatment of PMI have an important clinical significance. At present, a number of studies111213 about how to prevent perioperative myocardial injury after PCI had been carried out, and the majority of researches are focused on how to prevent myocardial injury after PCI through drug therapy. So far, the commonly used drugs include aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, statins, beta blockers and calcium antagonists and so on, and statins is commonly used in clinical. Studies have indicated that long-term use of statins can improve the initial clinical symptoms of ACS patients and reduce the incidence of ST segment elevation myocardial infarction1415. Different retrospective studies and meta-analysis have shown that for patients undergoing elective PCI, statin therapy can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative PMI161718. A large number of studies have shown that, in addition to stable plaque, statins can improve endothelial function and anti-inflammatory and improve the vascular wall inflammation induced by PCI. Meanwhile, it can effectively reduce the level of c-reactive protein, which can increase the survival rate of the patients after operation, and reduce the inflammatory reaction after PCI1920. However, statins also have some adverse drug reaction, such as liver toxicity and muscle toxicity2122. The mechanism of liver toxicity induced by statin is not entirely clear, it may be related to the inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase and HMG-CoA pathway, leading to a reduction of the HMG-CoA reductase and metallic acid. In vitro, studies have revealed that statins can lead to apoptosis of liver cells, and fenofibrate can aggravate apoptosis. The typical clinical manifestations of muscle toxicity induced by statin are fatigue, muscle pain, muscle weakness, convulsions and tendon pain. From 1987 to 2001 years, the United States FDA recorded a total of 42 death cases of rhabdomyolysis induced by statins. Due to the incidence of adverse drug reaction induced by statins is increasing, many scholars are exploring new drugs to prevent the occurrence of perioperative myocardial injury after PCI. Nicorandil is an anti-anginal agent with a dual mechanism of action. It is the only potassium channel opener which has the effect of antiangina pectoris, playing an effective role in the expansion of artery, vein and coronary artery232425. In addition, there was no serious effect on heart rate, myocardial contractility and conduction system. However, the conclusion, whether nicorandil has a myocardial protective effect is inconsistent. Hwang J26 and Kim J27 have found that nicorandil had no significant effect on PMI and cardiac enzymes after PCI in patients with stable or unstable angina, but Kim S28, Murakami M29 and Shehata M30 have carried out studies about the clinical effect of nicorandi, and their conclusion is that nicorandil can significantly reduce myocardial enzymes in patients after PCI, which was different from Hwang J and Kim J. Therefore, the purpose of our meta-analysis is to evaluate the myocardial protective effect of nicorandil in the perioperative period of patients after PCI, and to provide a reference for clinical applications.

Results

Study Selection and Characteristics

Finally, 543 articles were retrieval by searching the electronic databases and references of relevant articles. After excluding duplicate articles, 425 articles were left. By screening titles and abstracts of remaining articles, 382 apparently irrelevant articles were excluded. Then, the full texts of 43 articles were downloaded to evaluate in detail. Eventually, data from 16 articles26272829303132333435363738394041 include 1616 patients were listed into this meta-analysis. Among these patients, 804 patients in the nicorandil group and 812 patients in the control group. The flow diagram of study selection is shown in Fig. 1. The basic information of each included literature is shown in Table 1.
Figure 1

Flowchart of the selection strategy and inclusion/exclusion criteria in the current meta-analysis.

Table 1

Characteristics of studies included in meta-analysis.

AuthoryearcountrySample number
Average age (years)
Use method of Nicorandil (dose)preoperative method of Control groupoutcome Measures
NCCN
XM Ceng212015china10010059.4 ± 10.259.4 ± 10.2Venous pump (12 mg/day)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
WN Pei222014china403256.97 ± 9.8356.97 ± 9.83Oral (15 mg/day)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
JZ Lv232015china252055.41 ± 9.8255.13 ± 9.62Oral (15 mg/day)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
FR Mo242016china263160.35 ± 12.4561. 37 ± 10. 98Oral (15–30 mg/day)Conventional therapyTnT
XP Wu252013china484461.3 ± 8.461.3 ± 8.4Oral (15 mg/day)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
YH Li262012china524866.4 ± 10.264.8 ± 10.5Oral (15 mg/day)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
Y Zhang272012china303061.0 ± 5.863.0 ± 6.2Oral (15 mg/day)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
HY Han282015china454958.64 ± 8.5356.93 ± 9.74Oral (15 mg/day)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
SH Yang292014china373865.37 ± 8.2464.27 ± 8.66Oral (15 mg/day)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
XC Wang302012china424863.47 ± 9.2463.37 ± 8.06Oral (15 mg/day)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
Shehata M202014Egypt505059.4 ± 7.460.2 ± 4.3Oral (20 mg/day)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
Murakami M192006Japan9110165.0 ± 9.766.1 ± 10.3intravenous (2 μg/kg/min)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
Kim S182012Korea545565.5 ± 7.463.2 ± 9.2Intracoronary (4 mg)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
Isono T312008Japan232666.3 ± 7.966.5 ± 9.4intravenous (6 mg/h for 24 h)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
Kim J172005korea10010060.4 ± 11.761.7 ± 8.2Intravenous (10–15 mg/day)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT
Hwang J162013Japan414066.2 ± 965.3 ± 10Intracoronary (4 mg)Conventional therapyCK-MB,TnT

N: Nicorandil group, C: control group.

Literature quality evaluation

Of the 16 articles, four articles31323339 used a random number method, three articles283041 used a block randomization, eight articles2627293435363738 refer to the random method, but did not give a specific description, and the random method of the rest article40 is not clear. The hidden distribution of the sixteen articles26272829303132333435363738394041 is low; Fifteen articles262728293031323334353637383941 used a random single blind method, but the blind method of one article40 is not clear. The incomplete outcome data, selective reporting of results and other biases of the sixteen articles26272829303132333435363738394041 are low. The literature quality score is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Assessment of Methodological Quality of Included Studies.

StudyRandom allocationHidden distributionBlind methodIncomplete Outcome DataSelective reporting of resultsOther biasquality grade
XM Ceng21Random number methodLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
WN Pei22Random number methodLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
JZ Lv23Random number methodLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
FR Mo24mentioned randomLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
XP Wu25mentioned randomLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
YH Li26mentioned randomLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
Y Zhang27mentioned randomLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
HY Han28mentioned randomLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
SH Yang29Random number methodLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
XC Wang30No clearLowNo clearLowLowLowB
Shehata M20block randomizationLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
Murakami M19mentioned randomLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
Kim S18block randomizationLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
Isono T31block randomizationLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
Kim J17mentioned randomLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA
Hwang J16mentioned randomLowSingle-blindLowLowLowA

CK-MB after PCI

Nicorandil can significantly reduce the level of CK-MB in patients after PCI, including at 6hours (SMD = −0.57, 95% CI −0.78 ~ −0.36, P < 0.001), 12 hours (SMD = −0.21, 95% CI −0.39 ~ −0.03, P = 0.024), 18 hours (SMD = −0.67, 95% CI −0.93 ~ −0.41, P < 0.001) and 24 hours (SMD = −0.34, 95% CI −0.45 ~ −0.23, P < 0.001) after PCI. As showed in Fig. 2.
Figure 2

The comparisons of CK-MB at 6 h, 12 h, 18 h and 24 h after PCI between the nicorandil group and the control group.

Subgroup analysis

Because the population included in our meta-analysis is mainly coming from China, Japan and Korea, and most of the research objects belong to Chinese population, thus, the population was divided into the Chinese population and non Chinese population, and then conducted a subgroup analysis. Subgroup analysis showed that for Chinese population, Nicorandil can obviously decrease CK-MB level at 24 hours after PCI (SMD = −0.46, 95% CI −0.60 ~ −0.32, P = 0.001). However, for non Chinese population, nicorandil cannot decrease CK-MB level at 24 hours after PCI (P = 0.440), As showed in Fig. 3.
Figure 3

The comparisons of CK-MB at 24 h after PCI between the nicorandil group and the control group (Subgroup analysis: Chinese’s population and non Chinese’s population).

TnT after PCI

Nicorandil can significantly reduce the level of TnT in patients after PCI, including at 6 hours (SMD = −1.10, 95% CI −1.32 ~ −0.87, P < 0.001), 12 hours (SMD = −0.40, 95% CI −0.57 ~ −0.22, P < 0.001), 18 hours (SMD = −1.37, 95% CI −1.71 ~ −1.03, P < 0.001) and 24 hours(SMD = 0.50, 95% CI −0.61 ~ −0.39, P < 0.001). As showed in Fig. 4.
Figure 4

The comparisons of TnT at 6 h, 12 h, 18 h and 24 h after PCI between the nicorandil group and the control group.

In addition, all patients were divided into Chinese’s population and non Chinese population, and then conducted a subgroup analysis. Subgroup analysis showed that for Chinese’s people, nicorandil can obviously decrease TnT level at 24 hours after PCI (SMD = −0.74, 95% CI −0.88 ~ −0.60, P = 0.001). However, for non Chinese’s population, nicorandil cannot remarkable decrease TnT level at 24 hours after PCI (P = 0.487), As showed in Fig. 5.
Figure 5

The comparisons of TnT at 24 h after PCI between the nicorandil group and the control group (Subgroup analysis: Chinese’s population and non Chinese’s population).

Incidence of adverse reactions

Four articles evaluating the incidence of adverse reactions of nicorandil undergoing elective PCI. Meta-analysis showed that I2 = 56.9%, the heterogeneity is large, so random effects model was used to analyze. Meta-analysis (random effect’s model) results showed that nicorandil can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions in patients after elective PCI (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 ~ 0.83, P = 0.005). As showed in Fig. 6.
Figure 6

The incidence of adverse reactions in the nicorandil group and the control group (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.35~0.83, P = 0.073).

MPV after PCI

Nicorandil cannot significantly reduce the level of MVP in patients after PCI, including at 12 hours (P = 0.078) and 24 hours (P = 0.445). As showed in Fig. 7.
Figure 7

The comparisons of MPV at 12 h and 24 h after PCI between the nicorandil group and the control group.

Publication bias

Egger regression analysis was used to evaluate the publication bias. There was no publication bias of CK-MB at 24 hours after PCI (Egger’s test: P = 0.214) (Fig. 8A). There was also no publication bias of TnT at 24 hours after PCI (Egger’s test: P = 0.978) (Fig. 8B).
Figure 8

Egger regression analysis was used to evaluate the publication bias.

There was no publication bias of CK-MB at 24 hours after PCI (Egger’s test: P = 0.214) (Fig. 8A). There was also no publication biasof TnT at 24 hours after PCI (Egger’s test: P = 0.978) (Fig. 8B).

Discussion

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most effective methods for the treatment of myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina424344. Compared with traditional drug therapy, PCI can more effectively restore the blood supply to the myocardium and improve the prognosis of patients. However, a lot of studies have shown that there are still approximately 3% of patients failing to benefit from the treatment of PCI. On the contrary, the phenomenon of myocardial injury was appeared in a patient after PCI, which seriously affects the patient’s heart function and prognosis. Therefore, how to improve the blood flow perfusion of the ischemic myocardium after PCI and reduce the occurrence of myocardial injury is of particular importance. Research has shown that the K+ -ATP channel opener (such as nicorandil) can significantly reduce arrhythmia, chest pain and slow reflow phenomenon caused by PCI4546. However, the conclusion, whether nicorandil has a myocardial protective effect is inconsistent. Thus, we conduct this meta-analysis. In 2012, Kim S28 enrolled 213 consecutive patients with stable or unstable angina, which were expected in non-urgent PCI for de-novo coronary lesions. 54 patients in the nicorandil group and 55 patients in the control group. The purpose of the study is to assess whether nicorandil has a myocardial protective effect or not. Finally, they found that there were no significant differences in the incidence of post-procedural myocardial necrosis among the two groups (10.9% vs 14.8%, respectively, p = 0.9) and there were no significant differences in the incidence of post-procedural MI among two groups (p = 0.6). Meanwhile, in 2013, Hwang J26 conducted a clinical experiment includes 41 patients in the nicorandil group (n = 41) and 40 patients in the control group (n = 40). In the nicorandil group before PCI, four mg of intracoronary nicorandil was infused prior, and the results showed that the post-PCI peak CK-MB and troponin I levels were not significantly different between the two groups. However, Isono T41 conducted an experiment, including 29 patients undergoing elective PCI. And they found that nicorandil can suppress elevations of cardiac enzymes after elective PCI, suggesting that nicorandil enhances the myocardial protective effect of PCI against angioplasty-related myocardial injury. Kim S28 and Shehata M29 have also carried out a trial, and they results showed that nicorandil can protect the myocardium, which was different from Hwang J and Kim J. Therefore, it is necessary to make a systematic evaluation of this conclusion. In our meta-analysis, a total of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, and 1616 patients entered our study. Our results showed that nicorandil can reduce the levels of CK-MB and TnT after elective PCI and the incidence of adverse reaction caused by PCI for Chinese’s population, but the clinical benefit of nicorandil is not obvious for non Chinese’s population. Through this meta-analysis, we speculated that nicorandil has a cardioprotective effect for Chinese’s population, but may not be appropriate for non Chinese’s population. Nicorandil is an ATP sensitive potassium channel (KATP) open agent with the effect of nitrate4748. At the present, research on the myocardial protective effect of nicorandil after PCI is intravenous administration. Results have shown that intravenous nicorandil before PCI can significantly reduce the incidence of coronary slow flow after postoperative4950. The mechanism may be related with the decrease of infiltration of neutrophils into the ischemic area, which leading to the decrease of neutrophil mediated microcirculation. Our meta analysis results showed that when compared with the control group, the myocardial enzyme levels were significantly decreased in the nicorandil group after PCI, and the myocardial enzyme level of some time point was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Acting as a KATP agent, nicorandil can shorten the action potential duration, inhibit calcium overload. Furthermore, nicorandil can antagonize ADP induced platelet aggregation, improve microcirculation in ischemia area, decrease no reflow phenomenon. In addition, nicorandil can inhibit the formation of active oxygen, which is one of the mechanisms implicated in the protective effect on the myocardium51. The limitations of our meta-analysis include the following aspects: ① The included studies are mainly coming from China, Japan and Korea, lacking of randomized controlled trials from North America and Europe. ② The method of drug delivery is uniform. Some articles adopted the method of oral administration, and some articles adopted the method of intravenous administration, even some articles using the method of coronary administration, which may lead to a certain bias in implementation. In addition, there is no unity for the dosage and using time for Nicorandil. The possibility of implementation bias is further increased. ③Although the articles included in our meta-analysis were RCT, but most of the studies were single-blind RCT, bias will be inevitable appear. ④Short-term and long-term index need to be observed to evaluate the myocardial protective effects of nicorandil in patients after PCI. Because CK-MB, TnT, MPV and adverse reactions all belongs to short-term index, lacking the long-term index (For example, heart failure, myocardial infarction and arrhythmia, etc.) to estimate the effect of nicorandil, the representation is poor. Our study also suggests that some aspects should be paid attention to in the future when carrying out RCT: ① Due to the difference of nation and race, it needs to conduct RCT of multi-regional and multi-center, in order to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a drug. ② To regulate the use method of drugs, including usage, dosage and use of time, as far as possible to reduce the occurrence of confounding bias. ③ Describe the method of random grouping, single-blind or double-blind and the implementation of the method in detail, so as to reduce confounding bias. ④Long-term indicators should be increased to estimate the clinical effect after PCI, and then increase the reliability of results.

Conclusion

Our systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that nicorandil can reduce myocardial injury and reduce the incidence of adverse reaction caused by PCI for Chinese’s population, but the clinical benefit of Nicorandil is not obvious for Non Chinese’s population. However, due to the limitations of the quality and quantity of the articles, this conclusion still needs to be confirmed by multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trials.

Methods

Literature search

According to the statement of the preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, two researchers independently searched published randomized controlled trial(RCT) that investigated the clinical effect of nicorandil on prevention of perioperative myocardial injury in patients undergoing elective PCI. The retrieved database includes PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP database and Wang Fang database, the retrieval time was limited from inception to October 7, 2016. Relevant keywords related to nicorandil in combination as MeSH terms and text words (“Nicorandil” or “2-Nicotinamidoethyl Nitrate” or “2 Nicotinamidoethyl Nitrate” or “Nitrate, 2-Nicotinamidoethyl” or “2-Nicotinamidethyl Nitrate” or “2 Nicotinamidethyl Nitrate” or “Nitrate, 2-Nicotinamidethyl” or “SG-75” or “SG 75” or “SG75” or “Ikorel” or “Aventis Pharma Brand of Nicorandil” or “Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Brand of Nicorandil” or “Rhône Poulenc Rorer Brand of Nicorandil” or “Aventis Brand of Nicorandil” or “Nicorandil Aventis Brand” or “Adancor”) were used in combination with words related to percutaneous coronary intervention and myocardial reperfusion injury(“Coronary Intervention, Percutaneous” or “Coronary Interventions, Percutaneous” or “Intervention, Percutaneous Coronary” or “Interventions, Percutaneous Coronary” or “Percutaneous Coronary Interventions” or “Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization” or “Injuries, Myocardial Reperfusion” or “Myocardial Reperfusion Injuries” or “Reperfusion Injuries, Myocardial” or “Myocardial Ischemic Reperfusion Injury” or “Reperfusion Injury, Myocardial” or “Injury, Myocardial Reperfusion”). The retrieval language was limited to Chinese and English. In addition, reference articles of the extracted articles were also retrieved. When multiple reports of the same study were present, we used the most recent publication and supplemented it. All analyses were based on previously published studies, and thus no ethical approval or patient consent was required.

Study selection

We identified studies that prospectively evaluated the clinical effect of nicorandil on prevention of perioperative myocardial injury in patients undergoing elective PCI. Inclusion criteria:① The study was limited to randomized controlled trials (randomized controlled trials, RCTs), and the purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of nicorandil on prevention of perioperative myocardial injury in patients undergoing elective PCI; ② At least one of the observation group was applied nicorandil in the experiment; ③The does and usage of nicorandil is not limited; ④The article should provide sufficient data for analysis; ⑤ The study subjects were patients undergoing elective PCI, and coronary angiography was performed; ⑥ The retrieval language is limited to Chinese and English. Exclusion criteria: ① Retrospective, non-randomized trial; ② Semi randomized controlled trial, in which the grouping method of the participants in the experiment was not strictly random; ③Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or with AMI within the last 6 months; ④ Articles with incomplete or erroneous data.

Data extraction

The contents of the retrieved articles were reviewed by two researchers (ZY and QS) in accordance with the prior search methods. Data to be extracted including basic data of subjects (First author, publication year, country, sample number, average age, use method of nicorandil (dose), preoperative method of control group and outcome measures). If there was a lack of necessary data or some content to be clarified in the articles, an effort was made to try to make contact with the study authors, and if the necessary data to analyze was still unavailable, this article was excluded.

Statistical analyses

We used the Stata software, version 11.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, Tex) to pool and analyze results from the individual studies. Pooled results were reported as relative risks (RRs) and standardized mean difference (SMD), and presented with 95% confidence interval (CI) with two-sided P-values. P < 0.05 indicates that the difference was statistically significant. Heterogeneity of the inclusion study was assessed by I2 test, which assessed the appropriateness of pooling the individual study results. When I2 < 50%, the heterogeneity of the study was considered small; When I2 > 50%, the heterogeneity of the study was considered substantial, and then subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed to investigate the sources of heterogeneity. If necessary, meta-regression analysis was performed to explore heterogeneity.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Ye, Z. et al. The clinical effect of nicorandil on perioperative myocardial protection in patients undergoing elective PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 45117; doi: 10.1038/srep45117 (2017). Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  36 in total

1.  Perioperative myocardial injury in patients receiving cardiac output-guided haemodynamic therapy: a substudy of the OPTIMISE Trial.

Authors:  M A Gillies; A S V Shah; J Mullenheim; S Tricklebank; T Owen; J Antonelli; F Strachan; N L Mills; R M Pearse
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Comparison of quality-of-life measures after radial versus femoral artery access for cardiac catheterization in women: Results of the Study of Access Site for Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women quality-of-life substudy.

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Mitchell W Krucoff; Shubin Sheng; Kevin J Anstrom; W Britt Barham; Ian C Gilchrist; Robert A Harrington; Alice K Jacobs; Roxana Mehran; John C Messenger; Daniel B Mark; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  Role of aspirin for prevention and treatment of perioperative cardiovascular events.

Authors:  E Duceppe; M Mrkobrada; S Thomas; P J Devereaux
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Remote ischemic preconditioning prevents deterioration of short-term postoperative cognitive function after cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass: results of a pilot investigation.

Authors:  Judith A Hudetz; Kathleen M Patterson; Zafar Iqbal; Sweeta D Gandhi; Paul S Pagel
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Effect of myocardial protection of intracoronary adenosine and nicorandil injection in patients undergoing non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Seung-Ju Kim; Weon Kim; Jong-Shin Woo; Sang-Jin Ha; Won-Yu Kang; Sun-Ho Hwang; Dong-Gu Kang; Seung-Uk Lee; Sang-Ki Cho; Jeong-Soo Im; Wan Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Outcomes with cangrelor versus clopidogrel on a background of bivalirudin: insights from the CHAMPION PHOENIX (A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI]).

Authors:  Harvey D White; Deepak L Bhatt; C Michael Gibson; Christian W Hamm; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Matthew J Price; Ph Gabriel Steg; Gregg W Stone; Bernardo Cortese; Michael Wilensky; Efthymios N Deliargyris; Tiepu Liu; Jayne Prats; Robert A Harrington
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 11.195

7.  Effect of nicorandil on coronary events in patients with stable angina: the Impact Of Nicorandil in Angina (IONA) randomised trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Bivalirudin vs heparin with or without tirofiban during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: the BRIGHT randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Yaling Han; Jincheng Guo; Yang Zheng; Hongyun Zang; Xi Su; Yu Wang; Shaoliang Chen; Tiemin Jiang; Ping Yang; Jiyan Chen; Dongju Jiang; Quanmin Jing; Zhenyang Liang; Haiwei Liu; Xin Zhao; Jing Li; Yi Li; Bo Xu; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Nicorandil improves cardiac function and clinical outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: role of inhibitory effect on reactive oxygen species formation.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Ono; Tomohiro Osanai; Hiroshi Ishizaka; Hiroyuki Hanada; Takaatsu Kamada; Hiroyuki Onodera; Norio Fujita; Shingo Sasaki; Toshiro Matsunaga; Ken Okumura
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Nicorandil suppressed myocardial injury after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Isono; Hiroshi Kamihata; Yasuo Sutani; Masayuki Motohiro; Satoshi Yamamoto; Shiori Kyoui; Yoshiji Iharada; Kouji Kurimoto; Katsuko Hara; Hakuo Takahashi; Toshiji Iwasaka
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.164

View more
  8 in total

1.  Renoprotective effect of nicorandil in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of 4 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xiaobing Wang; Jin Geng; Hong Zhu; Changying Xing
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-01-04

2.  Effects of nicorandil infusion on ECG parameters in patients with unstable angina pectoris and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Weiding Wang; Xu Zhang; Kangyin Chen; Li Yin; Mengqi Gong; Yang Liu; Gary Tse; Lin Wu; Guangping Li; Tong Liu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Efficacy and safety of nicorandil on perioperative myocardial injury in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the PENMIPCI trial.

Authors:  Ziliang Ye; Haili Lu; Qiang Su; Manyun Long; Lang Li
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 4.  Effects of mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channel activation (nicorandil) in patients with angina pectoris undergoing elective percutaneous coronary interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Houyong Zhu; Xiaoqun Xu; Xiaojiang Fang; Jianwu Zheng; Tielong Chen; Jinyu Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 5.  The Role of Nicorandil in the Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes in the Gulf Region.

Authors:  Kevin Cheng; Khaldoon Alhumood; Fayez El Shaer; Ranil De Silva
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Myocardial protective effect of intracoronary administration of nicorandil and alprostadil via targeted perfusion microcatheter in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Weifeng Zhang; Jinjie Dai; Xiaowen Zheng; Ke Xu; Xiaoxiao Yang; Lan Shen; Xiaolei Wang; Ziyong Hao; Xingbiao Qiu; Lisheng Jiang; Hongyu Shi; Linghong Shen; Ben He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Comparison of antiangina therapies in patients with coronary heart disease in China: study protocol for a multicentre, retrospective, hospital system-based study.

Authors:  Ping Li; Juan Chen; Zheng Ke; Jing Han; Lan Shen; Ning Zhou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The Efficacy and Safety of Nicorandil for Periprocedural Myocardial Injury in Patients Undergoing PCI: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuanxi Lu; Wenbiao Hu; Qinghua Song; Qiwu Wang
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.