Literature DB >> 28322117

Effect of Overlapping Operations on Outcomes in Microvascular Reconstructions of the Head and Neck.

Larissa Sweeny1, Eben L Rosenthal2, Tyler Light3, Jessica Grayson1, Daniel Petrisor3, Scott H Troob3, Benjamin J Greene1, William R Carroll1, Mark K Wax3.   

Abstract

Objective To compare outcomes after microvascular reconstructions of head and neck defects between overlapping and nonoverlapping operations. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary care center. Subjects and Methods Patients undergoing microvascular free tissue transfer operations between January 2010 and February 2015 at 2 tertiary care institutions were included (n = 1315). Patients were divided into 2 cohorts by whether the senior authors performed a single or consecutive microvascular reconstruction (nonoverlapping; n = 773, 59%) vs performing overlapping microvascular reconstructions (overlapping; n = 542, 41%). Variables reviewed were as follows: defect location, indication, T classification, surgical details, duration of the operation and hospitalization, and complications (major, minor, medical). Results Microvascular free tissue transfers performed included radial forearm (49%, n = 639), osteocutaneous radial forearm (14%, n = 182), anterior lateral thigh (12%, n = 153), fibula (10%, n = 135), rectus abdominis (7%, n = 92), latissimus dorsi (6%, n = 78), and scapula (<1%, n = 4). The mean duration of the overlapping operations was 21 minutes longer than nonoverlapping operations ( P = .003). Mean duration of hospitalization was similar for nonoverlapping (9.5 days) and overlapping (9.1 days) cohorts ( P = .39). There was no difference in complication rates when stratified by overlapping (45%, n = 241) and nonoverlapping (45%, n = 344) ( P = .99). Subset analysis yielded similar results when minor, major, and medical complications between groups were assessed. The overall survival rate of free tissue transfers was 96%, and this was same for overlapping (96%) and nonoverlapping (96%) operations ( P = .71). Conclusions Patients had similar complication rates and durations of hospitalization for overlapping and nonoverlapping operations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and neck reconstruction; overlapping operations; surgical complications

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28322117     DOI: 10.1177/0194599817691746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  5 in total

1.  Complications Following Overlapping Orthopaedic Procedures at an Ambulatory Surgery Center.

Authors:  Charles A Goldfarb; Michael G Rizzo; Brandon L Rogalski; Anchal Bansal; Christopher J Dy; Robert H Brophy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Overlapping Surgery in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are 6-Week Complications Worse than Single Operating Room Scheduling?

Authors:  Alexander M Troester; Nathan R Hendrickson; Natalie A Glass; Nicholas A Bedard; Nicolas O Noiseux
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

Review 3.  CORR Synthesis: What Is the Current Understanding of Overlapping Surgery in Orthopaedics, Particularly as it Relates to Patient Outcomes and Perceptions?

Authors:  Daniel Pereira; Donald H Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Perceptions and Awareness of Overlapping Surgery in Patients With Shoulder Pain Presenting to an Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Clinic.

Authors:  Robert N Matar; Brian Johnson; Nihar S Shah; Brian M Grawe
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-10-15

5.  Incorporating a continuous suction system as a preventive measure against fistula-related complications in head and neck reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Hsien Pin Chang; Jong Won Hong; Won Jai Lee; Young Seok Kim; Yoon Woo Koh; Se-Heon Kim; Dae Hyun Lew; Tae Suk Roh
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2018-09-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.