INTRODUCTION: Oral piercing can lead to complications and dentists are in a unique position to detect such complications. The purpose of this study was: (i) to assess the immediate and the long-term effects, on dental students, of a training programme about oral piercing knowledge; and (ii) to assess the immediate effect, on adolescents, of a single educational intervention session about oral piercing. METHODS: A training programme for dental students (n = 66) was carried out in three phases. The last phase consisted of preparing and giving talks about oral piercing at schools, which was delivered by a random selection of dental students involved in the training programme. Dental students answered a questionnaire about oral piercing knowledge, before, immediately after (only the dental students included in the last phase) and 12 months after the training programme. Adolescents (n = 347) answered a survey about oral piercing knowledge before and after the talks. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in all comparison groups, except for the results in the 'before intervention' and in the '12 months after intervention' groups among dental students who had not prepared and given the talks to adolescents. Knowledge about oral piercing significantly improved among adolescents when comparing results before (mean questionnaire score = 3.0) and after (mean questionnaire score = 6.2) the talks. CONCLUSIONS: Oral piercing educational intervention had a favourable impact on adolescents and dental students, particularly among those who were more involved in the learning process.
INTRODUCTION: Oral piercing can lead to complications and dentists are in a unique position to detect such complications. The purpose of this study was: (i) to assess the immediate and the long-term effects, on dental students, of a training programme about oral piercing knowledge; and (ii) to assess the immediate effect, on adolescents, of a single educational intervention session about oral piercing. METHODS: A training programme for dental students (n = 66) was carried out in three phases. The last phase consisted of preparing and giving talks about oral piercing at schools, which was delivered by a random selection of dental students involved in the training programme. Dental students answered a questionnaire about oral piercing knowledge, before, immediately after (only the dental students included in the last phase) and 12 months after the training programme. Adolescents (n = 347) answered a survey about oral piercing knowledge before and after the talks. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in all comparison groups, except for the results in the 'before intervention' and in the '12 months after intervention' groups among dental students who had not prepared and given the talks to adolescents. Knowledge about oral piercing significantly improved among adolescents when comparing results before (mean questionnaire score = 3.0) and after (mean questionnaire score = 6.2) the talks. CONCLUSIONS: Oral piercing educational intervention had a favourable impact on adolescents and dental students, particularly among those who were more involved in the learning process.
Authors: Maria Jose Garcia-Pola; Jose Manuel Garcia-Martin; Pedro Varela-Centelles; Angel Bilbao-Alonso; Rocio Cerero-Lapiedra; Juan Seoane Journal: Quintessence Int Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 1.677
Authors: Rita D DeBate; Herbert H Severson; Deborah L Cragun; Jeff M Gau; Laura K Merrell; Jennifer R Bleck; Steve Christiansen; Anne Koerber; Scott L Tomar; Kelli R McCormack Brown; Lisa A Tedesco; William Hendricson Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2013-04-05
Authors: Francesco Covello; Camilla Salerno; Valentina Giovannini; Denise Corridore; Livia Ottolenghi; Iole Vozza Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-18 Impact factor: 3.390