| Literature DB >> 28321686 |
Aamir Raoof Memon1, Ahmed Waqas2.
Abstract
The removal of Beall's blog may result in increased numbers of predatory journals and their subsequent victims. Recognizing this, the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) suggested criteria for identifying predatory journals in a statement issued on February 18, 2017. These criteria may be helpful in the current scenario of scientific publishing. However, a few lapses and limitations need to be taken into account when translating these policies to the situation in developing countries. This letter presents several cases of legitimate journals and platforms from the developing world that may be erroneously categorized as predatory according to the WAME criteria. We also suggest some improvements in these journals' policies.Keywords: Indexing and abstracting; Journalism; Predatory; Research ethics
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28321686 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-9898-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Eng Ethics ISSN: 1353-3452 Impact factor: 3.525