Literature DB >> 28321570

Comparative analysis of locking plate versus hook plate osteosynthesis of Neer type IIB lateral clavicle fractures.

Benjamin Erdle1, Kaywan Izadpanah2, Martin Jaeger2, Patrizia Jensen2, Lukas Konstantinidis2, Jörn Zwingmann2, Norbert P Südkamp2, Dirk Maier2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Controversy exists on optimal operative treatment of vertically unstable Neer IIB lateral clavicle fractures. Aim of this study was to analyse and compare clinical and radiological results and complications of locking plate osteosynthesis (LPO) versus hook plate osteosynthesis (HPO) with acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilization. The hypothesis was, that HPO would recreate coracoclavicular stability more effectively and potentially lead to a superior outcome.
METHODS: This retrospective, observational cohort study included 32 patients (19 HPO, 13 LPO) with a mean age of 44.1 ± 14.2 years at surgery. The mean follow-up period was 54.2 months (range 25.2-111.4 months). Besides standard radiography, bilateral coracoclavicular distances were assessed by means of preoperative and follow-up stress radiographs after implant removal. Clinical outcome measures included the Constant score (CS), the Oxford shoulder score (OSS), the subjective shoulder value (SSV) and the Taft score (TS).
RESULTS: Bone union occurred in all but one patient and proved to occur delayed in five patients (15.6%). Radiographical healing required a mean of 4.2 ± 4.0 months irrespective of the type of osteosynthesis. At follow-up, mean coracoclavicular distance was increased by 34% (±36) without significant differences between both groups. HPO patients obtained a significantly lower TS (HPO: 9.5 ± 1.5 points, LPO: 11.1 ± 1.3 points; p = 0.005). Other mean score values did not differ (CS: 90.1 ± 7.4 points, OSS: 43.2 ± 9.2 points, SSV: 91.1 ± 14.7%). Sixteen patients (50.0%) experienced complications. Overall prevalence of complications was significantly higher in the HPO group (p = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: Both HPO and LPO were equally effective in relation to restoration of vertical stability, overall functional outcome and fracture consolidation in treatment of Neer IIB fractures. Contrary to our hypothesis, HPO was not associated with superior recreation of the coracoclavicular distance. Considerable drawbacks of HPO were an inferior ACJ-specific outcome (Taft-Score) and a higher overall complication rate. Level of evidence IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular joint; Clavicular hook plate; Coracoclavicular distance; Distal clavicle fracture; Locking plate; Neer type IIB

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28321570     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2645-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  17 in total

1.  Complications with the clavicle hook plate after fixation of Neer type II clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Yaiza Lopiz; Pablo Checa; Carlos García-Fernández; Jose Valle; Maria Luisa Vega; Fernando Marco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Fixation method for treatment of unstable distal clavicle fracture: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Manusak Boonard; Sermsak Sumanont; Alisara Arirachakaran; Eakachit Sikarinkul; Pichet Ratanapongpean; Wichan Kanchanatawan; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-22

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the use of hook plates and superior plates in the treatment of displaced distal clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Shahbaz S Malik; Muaaz Tahir; Mohammedabbas Remtulla; Sheraz Malik; Robert W Jordan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  What are the long-term patient-reported and clinical outcomes after lateral clavicle fractures? A cross-sectional study of 619 patients.

Authors:  Rens A van der Linde; Svenhjalmar van Helden; Sarah Woltz; Mostafa El Moumni; Frank F A IJpma
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Additional coracoclavicular augmentation reduces revision rates in the treatment of lateral clavicle fractures as compared to angle-stable plate osteosynthesis alone.

Authors:  Rony- Orijit Dey Hazra; Robert Maximillian Blach; Alexander Ellwein; Helmut Lill; Mara Warnhoff; Gunnar Jensen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Clinical outcomes of a combined osteoligamentous reconstruction technique of Neer Type IIB distal clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Cody R Perskin; Nirmal C Tejwani; Laith M Jazrawi; Philipp Leucht; Kenneth A Egol
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-10

Review 7.  An evaluation of treatment options for medial, midshaft, and distal clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Vannabouathong; Justin Chiu; Rahil Patel; Shreyas Sreeraman; Elias Mohamed; Mohit Bhandari; Kenneth Koval; Michael D McKee
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-05-04

8.  Fifteen-degree clavicular hook plate achieves better clinical outcomes in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Guanghui Li; Tuoen Liu; Xianfang Shao; Zhijun Liu; Jianhui Duan; Raji Akileh; Shousong Cao; Dadi Jin
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Surgical treatment of Neer type II and type V lateral clavicular fractures: comparison of hook plate versus superior plate with lateral extension: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yassine Ochen; Herman Frima; R Marijn Houwert; Marilyn Heng; Mark van Heijl; Egbert J M M Verleisdonk; Detlef van der Velde
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-03-07

10.  Clavicle hook plate versus distal clavicle locking plate for Neer type II distal clavicle fractures.

Authors:  Liang Li; Tian-Yan Li; Peichao Jiang; Guizhen Lin; Hongxiao Wu; Xiaochuan Han; Xuezhong Yu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.