| Literature DB >> 28321394 |
Nasarul Islam1, Irfan H Lone2.
Abstract
The electronic and nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of octaphyrin derivatives were studied by employing the DFT/TDFT at CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G (2d, 2p) level of the theory. Thiophene, phenyl, methyl and cyano moieties were substituted on the molecular framework of octaphyrin core, in order to observe the change in optoelectronic and nonlinear response of these systems. The frontier molecular orbital studies and values of electron affinity reveals that the studied compounds are stable against the oxygen and moisture present in air. The calculated ionization energies, adiabatic electron affinity and reorganization energy values indicate that octaphyrin derivatives can be employed as effective n-type material for Organic Light Emitting Diodes (OLEDs). This character shows an enhancement with the introduction of an electron withdrawing group in the octaphyrin framework. The polarizability and hyperpolarizability values of octaphyrin derivatives demonstrate that they are good candidates for NLO devices. The nonlinear response of these systems shows enhancement on the introduction of electron donating groups on octaphyrin moiety. However, these claims needs further experimental verification.Entities:
Keywords: bond-length-alternation; hyperpolarizability; mesomeric effect; polarizability; porphyrin; reorganization energy
Year: 2017 PMID: 28321394 PMCID: PMC5338300 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2017.00011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1Sketch of octaphyrin (OP) derivatives study using DFT at CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G (2d, 2p) level of theory.
Figure 2Optimized geometries of OP derivatives obtained at CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G (2d, 2p) level of calculations.
Ionization energy, adiabatic energy, and reorganization energy of OP derivatives calculated by employing DFT/CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G (2d, 2p) level of theory.
| OP-I | 6.82 | 6.89 | 3.09 | 3.13 | 0.211 | 0.131 |
| OP-II | 6.87 | 6.93 | 3.32 | 3.33 | 0.209 | 0.129 |
| OP-III | 6.92 | 6.96 | 3.41 | 3.49 | 0.221 | 0.124 |
| OP-IV | 6.98 | 7.01 | 3.53 | 3.51 | 0.228 | 0.121 |
| OP-V | 7.04 | 7.12 | 3.61 | 3.63 | 0.217 | 0.118 |
Were IP.
FMO (HOMO and LUMO energies) and Optical data of OP derivatives calculated by employing DFT and TDFT level of theory respectively.
| OP-I | −9.2622 | −4.603 | 4.659 | 530 | 4.341 | 0.722 | HOMO → LUMO 81 % |
| OP-II | −9.1713 | −4.611 | 4.560 | 538 | 4.217 | 0.718 | HOMO → LUMO 69 % |
| OP-III | −9.2099 | −4.628 | 4.582 | 540 | 4.202 | 0.701 | HOMO → LUMO 78 % |
| OP-IV | −9.2326 | −4.819 | 4.414 | 612 | 4.001 | 1.015 | HOMO → LUMO 95 % |
| OP-V | −9.5175 | −4.986 | 4.532 | 526 | 4.112 | 0.855 | HOMO → LUMO 90 % |
Were HOMO is highest occupied molecular orbital energy, LUMO lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy, ΔE energy gap between HOMO and LUMO, λ.
Figure 3The frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) of OP derivatives at DFT/ CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G (2d, 2p) level of theory.
DFT/TDFT calculated average values of the dipole moment (in ground (μ.
| OP-I | 3.80 | 93.98 | 2,086.31 | −3353.42 | 3.92 | 0.94 | 0.048 |
| OP-II | 4.54 | 144.29 | 7,906.63 | −2196.50 | 4.69 | 0.99 | 0.056 |
| OP-III | 4.91 | 157.20 | 7,911.70 | −1686.21 | 5.18 | 1.01 | 0.057 |
| OP-IV | 5.37 | 203.23 | 10,349.22 | 445.33 | 6.81 | 1.15 | 0.072 |
| OP-V | 3.98 | 111.50 | 4,038.53 | −2122.97 | 4.51 | 1.08 | 0.063 |