| Literature DB >> 28321230 |
Qunfeng Zhang1, Meiya Liu1, Jianyun Ruan1.
Abstract
The chlorotic tea variety Huangjinya, a natural mutant, contains enhanced levels of free amino acids in its leaves, which improves the drinking quality of its brewed tea. Consequently, this chlorotic mutant has a higher economic value than the non-chlorotic varieties. However, the molecular mechanisms behind the increased levels of free amino acids in this mutant are mostly unknown, as are the possible effects of this mutation on the overall metabolome and biosynthetic pathways in tea leaves. To gain further insight into the effects of chlorosis on the global metabolome and biosynthetic pathways in this mutant, Huangjinya plants were grown under normal and reduced sunlight, resulting in chlorotic and non-chlorotic leaves, respectively; their leaves were analyzed using transcriptomics as well as targeted and untargeted metabolomics. Approximately 5,000 genes (8.5% of the total analyzed) and ca. 300 metabolites (14.5% of the total detected) were significantly differentially regulated, thus indicating the occurrence of marked effects of light on the biosynthetic pathways in this mutant plant. Considering primary metabolism, including that of sugars, amino acids, and organic acids, significant changes were observed in the expression of genes involved in both nitrogen (N) and carbon metabolism. The suite of changes not only generated an increase in amino acids, including glutamic acid, glutamine, and theanine, but it also elevated the levels of free ammonium, citrate, and α-ketoglutarate, and lowered the levels of mono- and di-saccharides and of caffeine as compared with the non-chlorotic leaves. Taken together, our results suggest that the increased levels of amino acids in the chlorotic vs. non-chlorotic leaves are likely due to increased protein catabolism and/or decreased glycolysis and diminished biosynthesis of nitrogen-containing compounds other than amino acids, including chlorophyll, purines, nucleotides, and alkaloids.Entities:
Keywords: Camellia sinensis; chlorotic mutation; free amino acid; metabolism; nitrogen metabolism
Year: 2017 PMID: 28321230 PMCID: PMC5337497 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Phenotypic and ultra-structural characterization of chlorotic and green leaves. (A) Chlorotic leaves (left) and non-chlorotic leaves (right). (B,C) Ultrastructure of non-chlorotic leaves (B), and chlorotic leaves (C). Ch, chloroplast; CW, cell wall; Gr, grana; O, osmiophilic granules; pl, plastid; Sg, starch granule.
The content (mg/100 g fresh weight) of chlorophylls and carotenoids in the young leaves of chlorotic (full sunlight) and non-chlorotic tea plants.
| Chlorophyll total | 57.81 ± 0.98 | 4.50 ± 0.08 |
| Chlorophyll-a | 45.61 ± 0.18 | 1.71 ± 0.05 |
| Chlorophyll-b | 12.20 ± 0.80 | 2.79 ± 0.04 |
| Carotenoids | 30.40 ± 0.08 | 13.87 ± 0.21 |
| Neoxanthin | 5.82 ± 0.06 | 0.39 ± 0.01 |
| Lutein | 18.02 ± 1.20 | 3.58 ± 0.04 |
| Violaxanthin | 1.22 ± 0.04 | 0.57 ± 0.02 |
| α-Carotene | 1.34 ± 0.09 | 1.90 ± 0.19 |
| β -Carotene | 2.86 ± 0.05 | 4.18 ± 0.26 |
| Zeaxanthin | 1.14 ± 0.06 | 3.25 ± 0.06 |
Values shown are means ± SD (n = 3).
All the listed metabolites showed a significant difference between the within-row means at P < 0.05.
Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) classification of significantly (.
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 1 | 0 | |
| Carotenoid biosynthesis | 4 | 2 | |
| Circadian entrainment | 0 | 3 | |
| Cutin | 1 | 3 | |
| Diterpenoid biosynthesis | 3 | 1 | |
| Fatty acid metabolism | 0 | 3 | |
| Flavonoid biosynthesis | 5 | 5 | |
| Glutathione metabolism | 4 | 8 | |
| Linoleic acid metabolism | 0 | 2 | |
| Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 | 4 | 5 | |
| Monoterpenoid biosynthesis | 0 | 2 | |
| mRNA surveillance pathway | 3 | 4 | |
| Phenylalanine metabolism | 3 | 9 | |
| Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis | 8 | 10 | |
| Phototransduction | 0 | 2 | |
| Plant hormone signal transduction | 10 | 6 | |
| Protein processing | 3 | 0 | |
| Pyruvate metabolism | 8 | 4 | |
| Ribosome | 4 | 7 | |
| Ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes | 3 | 11 | |
| RNA degradation | 3 | 7 | |
| RNA transport | 1 | 7 | |
| Sphingolipid metabolism | 1 | 1 | |
| Spliceosome | 0 | 4 | |
| Starch and sucrose metabolism | 16 | 12 | |
| Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis | 7 | 2 | |
| Vitamin B6 metabolism | 1 | 2 | |
| Zeatin biosynthesis | 2 | 2 |
Pathway-map ID in the KEGG database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/).
Numbers of genes down- or up-regulated in the chlorotic leaves (compared with leaves from the non-chlorotic leaves).
Figure 2Summary of the metabolic analysis. Heat maps (A), and the principal component analysis (B), and projection to latent structure discriminant analysis (C) score plots of the metabolites analyzed by GC/GC-TOF MS in the non-chlorotic (G) and chlorotic (C) young tea leaves.
Significantly changed (VIP > 1 and |p(corr)| > 0.65 from partial least squares discriminant analysis) intracellular metabolites induced by chlorosis.
| L-Phenylalanine | 1.59 | 0.83 | 0.26 |
| L-Theanine | 1.88 | 0.98 | 1.44 |
| L-Glutamine | 1.91 | 0.99 | 3.38 |
| L-Lysine | 1.91 | 0.99 | 2.58 |
| L-Tyrosine | 1.45 | 0.75 | 0.26 |
| L-Glycine | 1.46 | 0.75 | 1.19 |
| L-Tryptophan | 1.54 | 0.81 | 0.78 |
| L-Alanine | 1.90 | 0.98 | 4.85 |
| L-Valine | 1.87 | 0.96 | 1.03 |
| L-Leucine | 1.44 | 0.74 | 2.81 |
| L-Serine | 1.88 | 0.97 | 2.15 |
| L-Aspartic acid | 1.90 | 0.98 | 2.91 |
| L-Methionine | 1.53 | −0.78 | −1.49 |
| L-Cysteine | 1.67 | 0.86 | 1.74 |
| L-Proline | 2.21 | 0.94 | 2.64 |
| L-Glutamic acid | 1.24 | 0.78 | 1.44 |
| Arabinose | 1.51 | −0.78 | −0.66 |
| L-Sorbose | 1.24 | −0.64 | −1.91 |
| D-Glucose | 1.89 | −0.97 | −2.47 |
| D-Galactose | 1.59 | −0.81 | −0.74 |
| D-Xylose | 1.58 | 0.82 | 2.32 |
| Pectin | 1.86 | 0.96 | 1.98 |
| D-Glucose | 1.89 | −0.97 | −2.73 |
| Fucose-1-P | 1.24 | 0.94 | 0.55 |
| Sucrose | 1.58 | −0.97 | −1.56 |
| Fructose 6-P | 1.1 | 0.89 | 1.02 |
| Fructose 2, 6-P2 | 1.42 | −0.94 | −1.32 |
| Fructose | 1.78 | −0.94 | −1.05 |
| Mannose | 1.67 | −0.9 | −2.34 |
| Fucose | 1.58 | −0.99 | −1.73 |
| cis-Aconitic acid | 1.75 | 0.91 | 1.82 |
| Tartaric acid | 1.76 | 0.92 | 1.16 |
| Oxalic acid | 1.18 | 0.62 | 1.68 |
| Citric acid | 1.34 | 0.82 | 0.54 |
| Digallate | 1.08 | 0.67 | 0.40 |
| Malic acid | 1.37 | −0.85 | −0.57 |
| Ascorbic acid | 1.55 | 0.95 | 2.16 |
| Phenylpyruvic acid | 1.62 | 0.99 | 2.61 |
| α-Ketoisovaleric acid | 1.65 | 0.85 | 0.48 |
| 2-Oxovaleric acid | 1.13 | −0.58 | −1.78 |
| Vanillic acid | 1.54 | −0.94 | −0.89 |
VIP is the variable importance in the projection values from partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA); p(corr) is the correlation coefficient (ranging from −1.0 to 1.0) between the model and original data. The p(corr) values remain stable during iterative variable selection and are comparable between models; C/G is the ratio of the mean peak intensity in chlorotic (C, full sunlight) relative to non-chlorotic (G) tea plants.
Content (mg/g fresh weight) of amino acids in young leaves of chlorotic (full sunlight) and non-chlorotic tea plants.
| Alanine | 0.28 ± 0.02a | 0.55 ± 0.05b |
| Aspartic acid | 0.90 ± 0.13a | 1.46 ± 0.12b |
| Glutamine | 0.61 ± 0.08a | 0.92 ± 0.04b |
| Glutamic acid | 2.41 ± 0.20a | 3.37 ± 0.30b |
| Serine | 0.30 ± 0.02a | 0.41 ± 0.03b |
| Theanine | 4.75 ± 0.30a | 6.22 ± 0.20b |
| Threonine | 0.07 ± 0.01a | 0.09 ± 0.00a |
| Proline | 0.06 ± 0.00a | 0.07 ± 0.00a |
| Glycine | 0.15 ± 0.01a | 0.14 ± 0.02a |
| γ-Aminobutyric acid | 0.05 ± 0.01a | 0.05 ± 0.02a |
| 23.20 ± 2.07a | 27.67 ± 1.33b |
Values shown are means ± SD (n = 3).
Different letters within rows indicate a significant difference between the means at P < 0.05.
Figure 3Schematic presentation of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA) pathway and amino acid biosynthesis, as affected by the chlorotic mutation. Red and green fonts indicate the up- and down-regulated genes and metabolites in the chlorotic leaves as compared with those in the non-chlorotic leaves. The gray font indicates the genes and metabolites that were unidentified in this study. DAHP, 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate; PK, pyruvate kinase; PPH, phosphopyruvate hydratase; SAT, serine O-acetyltransferase; PSAT, Phosphoserine aminotransferase; CM, chorismate mutase; CS, chorismate synthase; DHD, 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase; DHQS, 3-dehydroquinate synthase; EPSPS, 3-phosphoshikimate 1-carboxyvinyltransferase; SDH, shikimate dehydrogenase; DSD, 3-dehydroshikimate dehydratase; ALT, alanine transaminase; AS, anthranilate synthase; Cyss, cysteine synthase; DAHPS, 3-deoxy-7-phosphoheptulonate synthase; SHMT, serine hydroxymethyltransferase; DLD, dihydrolipoyl dehydrogenase; DLAT, dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase; AspS, asparagine synthase; MDH, malic dehydrogenase (malate dehydrogenase); ACLY, ATP citrate synthase; CITS, citrate synthase; AH, aconitate hydratase; OGD, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (succinyl-transferring); DLST, dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferase; SD, Succinate dehydrogenase; AK, aspartate kinase; ASADH, aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase; HSDH, homoserine dehydrogenase; HSK, homoserine kinase; BCAT, branched-chain-amino-acid transaminase; NiR, ferredoxin-nitrite reductase; NR, nitrate reductase; GS, glutamate synthase; GOGAT, NAD(+)-dependent glutamate synthase; GDH, glutamate dehydrogenase; HDH, histidinol dehydrogenase; NAGS, N-acetylglutamate synthase; GSADH, glutamate-5-semialdehyde dehydrogenase; P5CR, pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase; TS, theanine synthetase; ASS, argininosuccinate synthase; ASL, argininosuccinate lyase; GAD, glutamate decarboxylase. DHQD, 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase.
Figure 4Schematic presentation of amino acid metabolism as affected by the chlorotic mutation.