Literature DB >> 28321137

Navigating the Institutional Review Board (IRB) Process for Pharmacy-Related Research.

Marjorie Shaw Phillips, Osama Abdelghany, Susan Johnston, Rachel Rarus, Jennifer Austin-Szwak, Craig Kirkwood.   

Abstract

Pharmacists' specialized training and knowledge qualify them to lead and engage in research pertaining to optimal medication use. Performing research promotes pharmacy professionalism and fosters interdisciplinary collaboration. To conduct research appropriately, one must have thorough knowledge of when institutional review board (IRB) approval is required and how to successfully navigate IRB processes. The overarching mission of the IRB overseeing research at an organization per federal guidelines is to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects participating in research. This article discusses the following general pharmacy practice-based considerations relating to IRB processes: strategies for developing research projects, key distinctions between quality improvement and research, practical considerations for submitting IRB applications and documentation, different categories of IRB submission, informed consent and conditions for waivers or alterations of consent, and principal investigator obligations for approved research. Pharmacists should also account for organization-specific IRB processes when designing, submitting, and implementing research projects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IRB; institutional review board; pharmacy research; pharmacy residents

Year:  2017        PMID: 28321137      PMCID: PMC5345908          DOI: 10.1310/hpj5202-105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0018-5787


  11 in total

1.  Bringing the Common Rule into the 21st Century.

Authors:  Kathy L Hudson; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  What is "quality improvement" and how can it transform healthcare?

Authors:  Paul B Batalden; Frank Davidoff
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-02

3.  Developing great research questions.

Authors:  Earlene E Lipowski
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 4.  Developing and executing an effective research plan.

Authors:  Robert J Weber; Daniel J Cobaugh
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 5.  Conducting a successful residency research project.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Barletta
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  An instrument to differentiate between clinical research and quality improvement.

Authors:  Greg Ogrinc; William A Nelson; Susan M Adams; Ann E O'Hara
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct

7.  Research versus quality improvement: distinct or a distinction without a difference? A case study comparison of two studies.

Authors:  Susan Kirsh; Wen-Chih Wu; David Edelman; David C Aron
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2014-08

8.  How well informed is the informed consent for cancer clinical trials?

Authors:  Laeeq Malik; James Kuo; Desmond Yip; Alex Mejia
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Changes in the institutional review board submission process for multicenter research over 6 years.

Authors:  Monika Pogorzelska; Patricia W Stone; Elizabeth Gross Cohn; Elaine Larson
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 10.  Working with the institutional review board.

Authors:  Wesley G Byerly
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.