| Literature DB >> 28321062 |
Yuki Yoshimatsu1, Tomoko Takai, Yasuhisa Abe, Toshimasa Nakagawa.
Abstract
Objective Emphysematous cystitis (EC) has a high mortality rate compared with urinary tract infection without emphysema. However, its prognostic factors have yet to be determined. The presence of venous gas is suspected to be a rare, adverse prognostic factor of EC. However, all four previously reported cases improved. We hypothesized that venous gas is not an adverse prognostic factor of EC and aimed to assess the effect of venous gas on the EC prognosis. Methods Medical records were reviewed retrospectively. Patients The patients diagnosed with EC at Yodogawa Christian Hospital between April 2004 and September 2014 were included. Results Venous gas was present in 15 of 23 patients with EC. There was no significant difference in the background or clinical presentation between patients with or without venous gas. All patients with venous gas survived without invasive measures, whereas 50% of patients without venous gas died. Conclusion There was no marked difference in the mortality rate due to EC between the patients with and without venous gas. Venous gas may be a more common and less worrying finding in EC than assumed. It does not reflect the severity of infection, and air embolisms have not been reported so far. Venous gas may not affect the prognosis. This may be due to the differences in the mechanism of venous gas production. Gas in EC may develop due to glucose fermentation and intravesical pressurization, in contrast to the necrotizing infection seen in other emphysematous infections. This is the first study to assess the effect of venous gas on EC prognosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28321062 PMCID: PMC5410472 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.56.7601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intern Med ISSN: 0918-2918 Impact factor: 1.271
Figure.Computed tomography image of a patient with emphysematous cystitis. Gas is seen in the femoral vein (arrow) and branches of the internal iliac vein (arrowheads).
Patient Background, Clinical Presentation, Isolated Pathogens, and Outcome of EC Patients.
| Total | With venous gas | No venous gas | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cases | 23 | 15 | 8 | |
| Male sex | 12 (52.2%) | 8 (53.3%) | 4 (50.0%) | |
| Mean age | 76.3 | 76.9 | 75.4 | |
| Comorbidity | ||||
| 16 (69.6%) | 11 (73.3%) | 5 (62.5%) | ||
| 15 (65.2%) | 9 (60.0%) | 6 (75.0%) | ||
| 10 (43.5%) | 7 (46.7%) | 3 (37.5%) | ||
| 10 (43.5%) | 8 (53.3%) | 2 (25.0%) | ||
| Symptom | ||||
| Urologic | 12 (52.2%) | 8 (53.3%) | 4 (50.0%) | |
| 11 (47.8%) | 8(53.3%) | 3 (37.5%) | ||
| 6 (26.1%) | 4 (26.7%) | 2 (25.0%) | ||
| 4 (17.4%) | 3 (20.0%) | 1 (12.5%) | ||
| Systematic | 8 (34.8%) | 6 (40.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | |
| 3 (13.0%) | 2 (13.3%) | 1 (12.5%) | ||
| Asymptomatic | 4 (17.4%) | 1 (6.7%) | 3 (37.5%) | |
| Culture positivity | ||||
| 4/14 (28.6%) | 3/9 (33.3%) | 1/5 (20.0%) | ||
| 15/17(88.2%) | 10/11 (90.0%) | 5/6 (83.3%) | ||
| Pathogen | ||||
| 11(47.8%) | 7 (46.7%) | 4 (50.0%) | ||
| 3 (13.0%) | 2 (13.3%) | 1 (12.5%) | ||
| 1 (4.3%) | 1 (6.7%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Treatment | ||||
| 14 (60.9%) | 11 (73.3%) | 3 (37.5%) | ||
| 4 (17.4%) | 1 (6.7%) | 3 (37.5%) | ||
| 5 (21.7%) | 3 (20.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | ||
| Septic shock | 1 (4.3%) | 1 (6.7%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Disseminated intravascular coagulation | 1 (4.3%) | 1 (6.7%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Overall death | 4 (17.4%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (50%) | |