| Literature DB >> 28320323 |
Yang Liu1, Wen Cao2, Yu Liu1, Yun Wang1, Ren Lang3, Yun Yue1, An-Shi Wu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A moderate insufflation pressure and deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) have been recommended in laparoscopic surgery in consideration of the possible reduction in splanchnic perfusion due to the CO2-pneumoperitoneum. Since the liver is the major organ for rocuronium metabolism, the question of whether NMB of rocuronium would change with the variation of liver perfusion during pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery merits investigation.Entities:
Keywords: Hepatic blood flow; Pneumoperitoneum; Rocuronium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28320323 PMCID: PMC5359965 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-017-0335-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Anesthesiol ISSN: 1471-2253 Impact factor: 2.217
Fig. 1Flow-chart
Fig. 2Trail profile
Characteristics of the patients
| Group control ( | Group laparoscopy ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 46.2 ± 8.9 | 45.1 ± 7.3 |
| Height (cm) | 163.9 ± 2.1 | 162.8 ± 2.5 |
| Body weight (kg) | 62.6 ± 5.1 | 63.7 ± 7.6 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.8 ± 1.7 | 23.2 ± 1.8 |
| ASA classificationI/II(n) | 19/11 | 16/13 |
| Operation duration (min) | 163.7 ± 16.4 | 157.6 ± 12.0 |
| Infusion rate of propofol (μg · kg−1 · min−1) | 88.6 ± 13.6 | 92.5 ± 16.1 |
| Infusion rate of remifentanil (ng · kg−1 · min−1) | 134.1 ± 47.5 | 128.9 ± 53.3 |
Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) or number of patients
BMI body mass index, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists
Comparison of the effect of rocuronium in the two groups
| Group control ( | Group laparoscopy ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onset time (min) | 95.5 ± 12.3 | 94.3 ± 12.7 | 0.708 |
| Duration time (min) | 29.0 ± 5.8 |
| <0.0001 |
| Recovery index (min) | 9.8 ± 4.0 |
| 0.018 |
| Bolus Frenquency | 2.8 ± 0.7 |
| 0.014 |
| Infusion rate (μg · kg−1 · min−1) | 6.3 ± 1.8 |
| 0.046 |
Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). * P < 0.05 compared with the control group. ** P < 0.01 compared with control group
Parameters of hepatic blood flow in two groups assessed by laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasonography
| Group control ( | Group laparoscopy ( |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portal venous | T1 | VD (cm) | 0.99 ± 0.22 | 0.99 ± 0.21 | 0.971 |
| MV(cm/s) | 24.02 ± 9.24 | 23.71 ± 7.25 | 0.888 | ||
| BFV (ml/min) | 990.77 ± 133.65 | 1007.59 ± 145.36 | 0.645 | ||
| T2 | VD (cm) | 0.99 ± 0.23 |
| <0.0001 | |
| MV (cm/s) | 24.12 ± 9.82 | 21.81 ± 8.98 | 0.350 | ||
| BFV (ml/min) | 991.50 ± 136.77 |
| <0.0001 | ||
| T3 | VD (cm) | 1.00 ± 0.24 |
| <0.0001 | |
| MV (cm/s) | 23.91 ± 10.04 | 21.13 ± 6.55 | 0.214 | ||
| BFV (ml/min) | 989.87 ± 135.42 |
| <0.0001 | ||
| T4 | VD (cm) | 0.99 ± 0.23 |
| <0.0001 | |
| MV (cm/s) | 23.79 ± 9.39 | 23. 08 ± 6.31 | 0.733 | ||
| BFV (ml/min) | 987.03 ± 107.15 |
| 0.001 | ||
| T5 | VD (cm) | 1.00 ± 0.23 | 0.98 ± 0.22 | 0.806 | |
| MV (cm/s) | 23.63 ± 9.61 | 23.81 ± 7.59 | 0.937 | ||
| BFV (ml/min) | 995.13 ± 128.33 | 997.97 ± 144.60 | 0.937 | ||
| Hepatic artery | T1 | VD (cm) | 0.42 ± 0.12 | 0.42 ± 0.13 | 0.945 |
| MV (cm/s) | 37.79 ± 12.93 | 37.18 ± 13.07 | 0.856 | ||
| BFV (ml/min) | 275.43 ± 77.73 | 273.62 ± 79.32 | 0.930 | ||
| T2 | VD (cm) | 0.42 ± 0.12 |
| 0.029 | |
| MV (cm/s) | 37.69 ± 13.55 |
| <0.0001 | ||
| BFV (ml/min) | 273.80 ± 76.33 |
| 0.041 | ||
| T3 | VD (cm) | 0.42 ± 0.12 | 0.38 ± 0.12 | 0.238 | |
| MV (cm/s) | 37.43 ± 13.30 |
| 0.015 | ||
| BFV (ml/min) | 273.33 ± 77.88 | 287.83 ± 87.37 | 0.504 | ||
| T4 | VD (cm) | 0.41 ± 0.12 | 0.41 ± 0.13 | 0.919 | |
| MV (cm/s) | 37.39 ± 12.05 | 38.05 ± 12.56 | 0.837 | ||
| BFV (ml/min) | 274.50 ± 81.28 | 274.72 ± 83.69 | 0.992 | ||
| T5 | VD (cm) | 0.42 ± 0.12 | 0.42 ± 0.13 | 0.952 | |
| MV (cm/s) | 37.14 ± 12.01 | 36.77 ± 12.93 | 0.909 | ||
| BFV (ml/min) | 276.23 ± 80.66 | 273.62 ± 81.20 | 0.902 | ||
| Total Hepatic blood flow | T1 | BFV (ml/min) | 1266.20 ± 207.16 | 1281.21 ± 218.34 | 0.787 |
| T2 | BFV (ml/min) | 1265.30 ± 207.88 |
| <0.0001 | |
| T3 | BFV (ml/min) | 1263.20 ± 208.19 |
| <0.0001 | |
| T4 | BFV (ml/min) | 1261.53 ± 184.02 |
| <0.0001 | |
| T5 | BFV (ml/min) | 1271.37 ± 203.12 | 1271.59 ± 219.67 | 0.997 |
Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). * P < 0.05 compared with the control group. ** P < 0.01 compared with the control group. # P < 0.05 compared with before pneumoperitoneum period. ## P < 0.01 compared with before pneumoperitoneum period
VD vessel diameter, MV mean flow velocity, BFV blood flow volume
Fig. 3Morphologic changes in the hepatic blood flow induced by CO2-pneumoperitoneum on laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasonography. a Two-dimensional image of portal vein before insufflation of CO2. b Thirty min after insufflation of CO2 in the Trendelenburg position, the portal vein showed a marked decrease in the VD from 0.90 cm to 0.64 cm, as well as a marked decrease in MV from 29.50 cm/s to 14.60 cm/s. The calculated BFV decreased from 1126 ml/min to 281 ml/min. c Two-dimensional image of hepatic artery before insufflation of CO2. d Thirty min after insufflation of CO2 in the Trendelenburg position, the MV of hepatic artery was significantly increased from 19.2 cm/s to 26.1 cm/s with the VD less affected. The calculated BFV was similar (93 ml/min vs 96 ml/min) to that before insufflation of CO2. VD vessel diameter, MV mean flow velocity, BFV blood flow volume
Fig. 4Quadratic correlation between portal venous blood flow at T4 and clinical duration of rocuronium