Ryan A McTaggart1, Shadi Yaghi2, Daniel C Sacchetti3, Richard A Haas1, Morgan Hemendinger3, Daniel Arcuri1, Jeffrey M Rogg1, Karen L Furie3, Mahesh V Jayaraman4. 1. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States. 2. Department of Neurology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States. Electronic address: syaghi@lifespan.org. 3. Department of Neurology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States. 4. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Neurology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States; Department of Neurosurgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is very limited data on the use of MRI based perfusion imaging to select patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) for intraarterial therapy beyond 6h from onset. Our aim is to report the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke and large artery occlusion who presented beyond 6h from onset, had favorable MRI imaging profile, and underwent mechanical embolectomy. METHODS: This is a single institution (Rhode Island Hospital) retrospective study between December 1st, 2015, and July 30th, 2016 that included patients with acute ischemic stroke and proximal LVO with CT ASPECTS of 6 or more and 6-24h from symptom onset who were assessed for mechanical embolectomy using MRI based perfusion imaging. Favorable imaging profile was defined based on prior studies as 1) DWI lesion volume (as defined as apparent diffusion coefficient<620×10-6mm2/s) of 70ml or less; 2) Penumbra volume (as defined by volume of tissue with Tmax>6s) of 15ml or greater; 3) A mismatch ratio of 1.8 or more; and 4) Volume of tissue with perfusion lesion with Tmax>10s is <100ml. Good outcome was defined as a 90-day mRS≤2. RESULTS: 41 patients met the inclusion criteria; 22 (53.7%) had favorable imaging profile and underwent mechanical embolectomy. The rate of good outcomes in this series was similar to that in a patient level pooled meta-analysis of the recent endovascular trials (63.6% vs. 46%, p=0.13). None of the patients in our cohort had symptomatic intracereberal hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: MRI perfusion based imaging may help select patients with acute ischemic stroke and proximal emergent LVO for embolectomy beyond the treatment window used in most endovascular trials. This provides compelling evidence for stroke centers to participate in ongoing trials using advanced imaging to study endovascular treatment in this patient population.
INTRODUCTION: There is very limited data on the use of MRI based perfusion imaging to select patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) for intraarterial therapy beyond 6h from onset. Our aim is to report the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke and large artery occlusion who presented beyond 6h from onset, had favorable MRI imaging profile, and underwent mechanical embolectomy. METHODS: This is a single institution (Rhode Island Hospital) retrospective study between December 1st, 2015, and July 30th, 2016 that included patients with acute ischemic stroke and proximal LVO with CT ASPECTS of 6 or more and 6-24h from symptom onset who were assessed for mechanical embolectomy using MRI based perfusion imaging. Favorable imaging profile was defined based on prior studies as 1) DWI lesion volume (as defined as apparent diffusion coefficient<620×10-6mm2/s) of 70ml or less; 2) Penumbra volume (as defined by volume of tissue with Tmax>6s) of 15ml or greater; 3) A mismatch ratio of 1.8 or more; and 4) Volume of tissue with perfusion lesion with Tmax>10s is <100ml. Good outcome was defined as a 90-day mRS≤2. RESULTS: 41 patients met the inclusion criteria; 22 (53.7%) had favorable imaging profile and underwent mechanical embolectomy. The rate of good outcomes in this series was similar to that in a patient level pooled meta-analysis of the recent endovascular trials (63.6% vs. 46%, p=0.13). None of the patients in our cohort had symptomatic intracereberal hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: MRI perfusion based imaging may help select patients with acute ischemic stroke and proximal emergent LVO for embolectomy beyond the treatment window used in most endovascular trials. This provides compelling evidence for stroke centers to participate in ongoing trials using advanced imaging to study endovascular treatment in this patient population.
Authors: Shadi Yaghi; Adam de Havenon; Tristan Honda; Jason D Hinman; Radoslav Raychev; Latisha K Sharma; Song Kim; Edward Feldmann; Jose G Romano; Shyam Prabhakaran; David S Liebeskind Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 2.486