Literature DB >> 28319994

Growth of bacterial phytopathogens in animal manures.

Wojciech Sledz1, Sabina Zoledowska1, Agata Motyka1, Leszek Kadziński2, Bogdan Banecki2.   

Abstract

Animal manures are routinely applied to agricultural lands to improve crop yield, but the possibility to spread bacterial phytopathogens through field fertilization has not been considered yet. We monitored 49 cattle, horse, swine, sheep or chicken manure samples collected in 14 Polish voivodeships for the most important plant pathogenic bacteria - Ralstonia solanacearum (Rsol), Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc), Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum (Pcc), Pectobacterium atrosepticum (Pba), Erwinia amylovora (Eam), Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus (Cms) and Dickeya sp. (Dsp). All of the tested animal fertilizers were free of these pathogens. Subsequently, the growth dynamics of Pba, Pcc, Rsol, and Xcc in cattle, horse, swine, sheep and chicken manures sterilized either by autoclaving or filtration was evaluated. The investigated phytopathogens did not exhibit any growth in the poultry manure. However, the manure filtrates originating from other animals were suitable for microbial growth, which resulted in the optical density change of 0.03-0.22 reached within 26 h (48 h Rsol, 120 h Xcc), depending on bacterial species and the manure source. Pcc and Pba multiplied most efficiently in the cattle manure filtrate. These bacteria grew faster than Rsol and Xcc in all the tested manure samples, both the filtrates and the autoclaved semi-solid ones. Though the growth dynamics of investigated strains in different animal fertilizers was unequal, all of the tested bacterial plant pathogens were proven to use cattle, horse, swine and sheep manures as the sources of nutrients. These findings may contribute to further research on the alternative routes of spread of bacterial phytopathogens, especially because of the fact that the control of pectionolytic bacteria is only based on preventive methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dickeya solani; Erwinia amylovora; Pectobacterium atrosepticum; Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum; Ralstonia solanacearum; Xanthomonas campestris; animal manure; plant protection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28319994     DOI: 10.18388/abp.2016_1389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biochim Pol        ISSN: 0001-527X            Impact factor:   2.149


  2 in total

1.  Antibacterial Activity of Fructose-Stabilized Silver Nanoparticles Produced by Direct Current Atmospheric Pressure Glow Discharge towards Quarantine Pests.

Authors:  Anna Dzimitrowicz; Agata Motyka-Pomagruk; Piotr Cyganowski; Weronika Babinska; Dominik Terefinko; Piotr Jamroz; Ewa Lojkowska; Pawel Pohl; Wojciech Sledz
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.076

2.  Shifts in microbial community, pathogenicity-related genes and antibiotic resistance genes during dairy manure piled up.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Chenjie Ma; Wen Zhang; Wu Li; Jialin Yu; Di Xue; Xiaolin Wu; Guangcun Deng
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 5.813

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.