Literature DB >> 28319871

Autoantibodies and immune complexes to oxidation-specific epitopes and progression of aortic stenosis: Results from the ASTRONOMER trial.

Romain Capoulade1, Kwan L Chan2, Patrick Mathieu1, Yohan Bossé1, Jean G Dumesnil1, James W Tam3, Koon K Teo4, Xiaohong Yang5, Joseph L Witztum5, Benoit J Arsenault1, Jean-Pierre Després1, Philippe Pibarot6, Sotirios Tsimikas7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and oxidized phospholipids on apolipoprotein B-100 (OxPL-apoB) predict the progression of pre-existing mild-to-moderate calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS). Whether indirect markers of oxidation-specific epitopes (OSE) are also predictive is not known. The association between IgG and IgM autoantibodies and malondialdehyde-modified low density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) and IgG and IgM apolipoprotein B immune complexes (apoB-IC), and the hemodynamic progression rate of CAVS was determined in the ASTRONOMER (Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation: Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin, NCT00800800) trial.
METHODS: Plasma levels of IgG and IgM MDA-LDL and apoB-IC were measured in 220 patients with mild-to-moderate CAVS from the ASTRONOMER trial. The endpoint of this study was the progression rate of CAVS, measured by the annualized increase in peak aortic jet velocity (Vpeak) over a median follow-up of 3.5 [2.9-4.5] years.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the progression rate of CAVS across tertiles of IgG and IgM MDA-LDL and apoB-IC levels (all p > 0.05). After multivariable analysis, no marker reached significance level to predict faster CAVS progression or need for aortic valve replacement (all p > 0.05). There was no interaction between the OSE antibody titers and plasma levels of Lp(a) or OxPL-apoB, as well as age, with regards to the progression rate of CAVS.
CONCLUSIONS: Autoantibody titers to MDA-LDL and apoB-IC, which are an indirect measurement of OSE, unlike direct measurements of OxPL-apoB or their major lipoprotein carrier Lp(a), do not predict the progression of CAVS or need for AVR.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Calcific aortic valve stenosis; Doppler echocardiography; Lipoprotein(a); Oxidation-specific biomarkers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28319871     DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  3 in total

1.  The association between aortic valve calcification, cardiovascular risk factors, and cardiac size and function in a general population.

Authors:  Lida Khurrami; Jacob Eifer Møller; Jordi Sanchez Dahl; Rasmus Carter-Storch; Nicolaj Lyhne Christensen; Manan Pareek; Jes Sanddal Lindholt; Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis and Atherosclerotic Calcification.

Authors:  Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira Sá; Luiz Rafael P Cavalcanti; Álvaro M Perazzo; Rafael A F Gomes; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Konstantin Zhigalov; Alexander Weymann; Arjang Ruhparwar; Ricardo Carvalho Lima
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Aortic Valve Stenosis and Mitochondrial Dysfunctions: Clinical and Molecular Perspectives.

Authors:  Gaia Pedriali; Giampaolo Morciano; Simone Patergnani; Paolo Cimaglia; Cristina Morelli; Elisa Mikus; Roberto Ferrari; Vincenzo Gasbarro; Carlotta Giorgi; Mariusz R Wieckowski; Paolo Pinton
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.